NYCmetsfan
Banned
I was in new Jersey and saw my first trump yard sign lol
The trump campaign is thinking of trump speaking off-site during the RNC.
http://www.npr.org/2016/06/17/48254...ign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20160618
Obama won it by over 20 points in 08 and by around 18 in 12.It's still a ludicrous example for trump or his camapign to use.
Why would people even go to the convention at that point?
There will be a bunch of empty chairs present at the convention. He or his surrogates will be talking to a bunch of empty chairs at the RNC.
At this rate, I'm waiting for him to announce he'll compete in Massachusetts.Absolutely. But compared to New York, California, or Maryland it sounds realistic.
For that same reason people go to the places on election night.Why would people even go to the convention at that point?
I can't stand his speaking style. It's like he's lecturing children. So repetitive and self-aggrandizing.In other news trump mentioned another conspiracy theory at one of his recent rally.
Hint: It involves the FBI and Bernie.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfPfirzwSQE
For that same reason people go to the places on election night.
"I was there"
The same reason people slow down to see a car crash.Why would people even go to the convention at that point?
At this rate, I'm waiting for him to announce he'll compete in Massachusetts.
Why are you live blogging your date on PoliGAF? Your date will believe you're weird...er than he initially gauged.
He was buying tokens for the batting cages at the time. Which, those things are terrifying. Balls flying at you at like 50 miles per hour? Not for me. I didn't hit anything.
And, yassss, Trump, talk EVERY SINGLE NIGHT. Every night. Please. This is your time to be magical and amazing and awesome. That's what the people want.
The big question this weekend in Chicago is how to turn the Bernie Sanders movement into a lasting element of Democratic politics.
For some of the Sanders faithful on Saturday afternoon, the answer was locking arms on a civic center floor and struggling as police officers pulled them apart and arrested them.
...
In the basement of the Lakeside Center, where the Summit was held, some of those younger Sanders supporters prepared for what they called direct action loud, consistent, and perhaps disruptive protest outside the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia. Several dozen of them attended a training on how to march, how to follow a chant, how to defy police orders to disperse by sitting and locking arms in whats called a human chain, and how to conduct themselves when the police stepped in and physically removed them.
Trainers wearing fake badges waded among the chanting and human-chained protesters, pulling them apart, putting their hands behind their backs, and leading them away.
So about 3 or 4 will show up?Thousands of Sanders supporters have already signed a Facebook petition promising to protest the Democratic convention.
So about 3 or 4 will show up?
Yea, I'm not too concerned about them anymore
They don't even seem to know what they're even protesting about anymore. They just want to protest for the sake of protesting and that sort of stuff doesn't really attract big crowds.
The trump campaign is thinking of trump speaking off-site during the RNC.
http://www.npr.org/2016/06/17/48254...ign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20160618
Yes, because that strategy has worked brilliantly for him so far in the general election.Not really a bad idea of one that has no campaign. Use a heavily spectated event to draw attention to himself and lay out his proposals. Use the media to talk about his ideas. Most likely his ideas won't have much substance, it'll just be crazy and stupid ideas, or it'll be incredibly safe and boring with some contradictions. Likely to be all three.
Superdelegates can save the party from an extreme nominee
Yeah, I bet the Republicans wish they had that this year. But consider what would happen if they did: Republican superdelegates the elites of the party swoop in at the convention and throw it to Ted Cruz or someone else, despite Trumps significant lead in votes. The Trump voters might very well riot, or at least not vote for the Republican nominee.
It would be a disaster. Yes, Trump as the nominee is a disaster in and of itself, but youd just be replacing it with a different type of disaster.
Bottom line: if your party has gone so far off the rails that youre nominating someone so crazy that the partys leaders have to step in and effectively overturn the will of the people, youre pretty screwed anyway. May as well just let the person take over, crash the party in one election, and then use that as a cautionary tale to elect a more balanced nominee next time. Subverting the popular vote will likely just prolong the internal problem youre having.
When you think you are trying to save the world, even a windmill becomes a firebreathing dragon. In other words, its a quixotic campaign.They just want so desperately to feel like a part of something bigger than themselves, so they latched onto Bernie's campaign, rode the bandwagon, and now want to go down screaming with the sinking ship. But, here's the thing... nobody cares. Nobody will hear you. Nobody really wants to.
God I'm gonna miss Onion Joe Biden.
God I'm gonna miss Onion Joe Biden.
God I'm gonna miss Onion Joe Biden.
Yes, because that strategy has worked brilliantly for him so far in the general election.
In other news trump mentioned another conspiracy theory at one of his recent rally.
Hint: It involves the FBI and Bernie.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfPfirzwSQE
Do you think there is actually damning stuff in the TPP emails?
So one thing to note is that the period where Hillary and Trump were close in the polls wasn't actually driven by Trump gaining in polls. You can see from HuffPost Pollster that he stayed static and is now starting to drop hard. Hillary just took a dive at the beginning of May and is slowly starting to recover.
So that polling dip may always have been basically fake, because that drop in Hillary's polls is probably driven by Bernie voters. She's likely to get back to 47% pretty soon while Trump stays mired at 35% or so.