Basileus777
Member
200k were streaming on YouTube last night
That's a lot
Not compared to 28 million. That number suggests that streaming is a small part of the audience.
200k were streaming on YouTube last night
That's a lot
200k were streaming on YouTube last night
That's a lot
So by watching on CSPAN I didn't help?
Also these numbers don't include PBS and a few other smaller nets, so we won't get the full picture until tonight.
Ultimately, both final nights of the convention are going to have been viewed by a similarly large amount of people in a metric that means little in terms of November.
I can see a decent make up of liberal view on PBS or CSPAN to avoid Jeffery Lord and whatever flavor of the day was on MSNBC
Trump is a morbid curiosity for a lot of people and entertainment for those that are completely apolitical. I'm not really surprised that the reality TV star was able to get more viewers for his acceptance speech with all things considered.
Not taking the bait on your Citizen's United comment.
It isn't surprising that a relatively stock politician like Hillary gets less viewers than a shock n' awe reality show candidate like Trump.
Something does have to explain why the numbers for both conventions were lower than the past. Whether it's all the other ways to watch or people just waiting for bits and pieces to be shown online/on tv the next day.
It isn't surprising that a relatively stock politician like Hillary gets less viewers than a shock n' awe reality show candidate like Trump.
I can't resist defending the decision. So many people completely misunderstand what it held, let alone understanding why that holding was the correct one.
I can't resist defending the decision. So many people completely misunderstand what it held, let alone understanding why that holding was the correct one.
Something does have to explain why the numbers for both conventions were lower than the past. Whether it's all the other ways to watch or people just waiting for bits and pieces to be shown online/on tv the next day. There is a change occurring on how people absorb these things.
Something does have to explain why the numbers for both conventions were lower than the past. Whether it's all the other ways to watch or people just waiting for bits and pieces to be shown online/on tv the next day. There is a change occurring on how people absorb these things.
Something does have to explain why the numbers for both conventions were lower than the past. Whether it's all the other ways to watch or people just waiting for bits and pieces to be shown online/on tv the next day. There is a change occurring on how people absorb these things.
Something does have to explain why the numbers for both conventions were lower than the past. Whether it's all the other ways to watch or people just waiting for bits and pieces to be shown online/on tv the next day. There is a change occurring on how people absorb these things.
I mean, the likelihood that Hillary was going to say anything crazy was pretty low whereas the odds that Trump might call Hillary a bitch on live television were far higher.
It's the same reason the debates will draw record ratings, and why Trump has a lot to lose in the debates.
Deadline did the same yesterday but then the total viewers ended up higher.~Ratings aren't final until the afternoon and comparing fast nationals to final ratings is an exercise in futility~
Plenty of people smarter than you or I think it was the wrong decision. Arrogance is unbecoming.
Also, I think Buckley v. Valeo is wrong. People can disagree on stuff.
I want to take your post as a sincere divergence of opinion based on your own legitimate views on the matter, but the Antonin Scalia avatar makes it hard to take you seriously on this.
Btw, what's all this talk about states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Minnesota trending red? Is it cause Obama won those states by smaller margins in 2012 than he did in 2008? I figured that was just due to people not being as excited to vote for him the second time around.
Do you think Trump calling for Russia to hack Hillary's emails is appropriate/inappropriate?:
D: 10/80
R: 61/22
I: 32/48
http://hotair.com/archives/2016/07/...-trump-urging-russia-to-find-hillarys-emails/
So 61 percent of Republicans think that's ok?
Oh really?
We didn't even make it 24 hours without analy fixating on something. Well at least we're consistent !
Wouldn't there be two Ls in anallyWe didn't even make it 24 hours without analy fixating on something. Well at least we're consistent !
Wouldn't there be two Ls in anally
Que?
Large non college white population especially PA. Due to economy lagging not enough migration instate
Ya no idea why my phone dropped one of the l's. But you're right should have been two.Wouldn't there be two Ls in anally