Would be interesting seeing the spin from republicans on how the shutdown is democrats fault.
Some have already tried to float some of it, but I haven't seen anyone buying it.
Would be interesting seeing the spin from republicans on how the shutdown is democrats fault.
Some have already tried to float some of it, but I haven't seen anyone buying it.
This is going to be another Inauguration crowd size fiasco, isn't it?
President Trump had the most New England Patriots show up to the White House. Period.
It'll work because Republicans always fall in line.They have the presidency and congress, who would buy this besides the faithful? That's almost as dumb as saying Obamacare imploding would be Democrats' fault.
I don't know much about the man with the keys to the throne, Tucker Carlson, but after watching some of his clips I googled "Tucker Carlson confused face" and I knew there was going to be a shitload of results.
"Donald Trump? Don't know her. AHCA? Don't know her."How is Karen Handel taking this news of the AHCA revival?
Intersectionality*~probably~ not Bernie's best move to say that he doesn't know if Ossoff is a progressive before he goes to stump for an anti-abortion candidate.
~probably~ not Bernie's best move to say that he doesn't know if Ossoff is a progressive before he goes to stump for an anti-abortion candidate.
Someone else..Quist or someone else? Because I thought Quist was pro-choice.
Quist or someone else? Because I thought Quist was pro-choice.
Rob believes women should have the right and freedom to make their own healthcare decisions without government intrusion. He stands against the defunding of Planned Parenthood, which provides vital health care services to thousands of Montana women.
Sure, but it's pretty obvious that Sanders doesn't really give a shit if you're conservative about women's issues, you're a progressive in his book if you're economically progressive.He's aiming to be mayor of Omaha so it's not like he'll be influencing national policy. Looks to be facing an uphill battle though unless first-round results aren't representative.
He's aiming to be mayor of Omaha so it's not like he'll be influencing national policy. Looks to be facing an uphill battle though unless first-round results aren't representative.
Fulton, who said he opposes abortion, also introduced a less restrictive bill (LB676) in Nebraska. It requires the physician performing the abortion to tell a woman an ultrasound is available, but it doesnt require the ultrasound to be performed.
Sen. Heath Mello, a Democrat who said he opposes abortion, signed on as a co-sponsor, calling the measure a positive first step to reducing the number of abortions in Nebraska.
It seemed like a good compromise, without bringing in the constitutional issues seen in other states, he said.
He's aiming to be mayor of Omaha so it's not like he'll be influencing national policy. Looks to be facing an uphill battle though unless first-round results aren't representative.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRdqMpqkdEY~probably~ not Bernie's best move to say that he doesn't know if Ossoff is a progressive before he goes to stump for an anti-abortion candidate.
Ya, I don't have a problem w/ local Ds running conservative locally in order to get elected. I have an issue w/ a national standard bearer endorsing it.I think people need to be more okay with the fact that Democrats are a multitude of things and that because of our party system, we really don't have a cohesive unit. A Democrat from GA-06 and a Democrat from MT-AL will have to be different, and that's okay. Just don't expect huge cohesion in a two-party system and work within the contradictions.
Mayors have a lot of power over local laws, though. If Nebraska is anything like other nearby states, Omaha might be the only place in the state where a woman could go to get an abortion if she wanted one. As mayor, he would have substantial influence over whether that could even happen.
Sure, but it's pretty obvious that Sanders doesn't really give a shit if you're conservative about women's issues, you're a progressive in his book if you're economically progressive.
I mean, sure, yes, federal races have a lot more at stake with abortion policy, but when he was a state senator...
http://journalstar.com/news/local/g...cle_3e406d52-1489-5adf-b16c-c627a48ac03e.html
I guess I'm not sure if Mello is progressive!
~probably~ not Bernie's best move to say that he doesn't know if Ossoff is a progressive before he goes to stump for an anti-abortion candidate.
I think people need to be more okay with the fact that Democrats are a multitude of things and that because of our party system, we really don't have a cohesive unit. A Democrat from GA-06 and a Democrat from MT-AL will have to be different, and that's okay. Just don't expect huge cohesion in a two-party system and work within the contradictions.
I think people need to be more okay with the fact that Democrats are a multitude of things and that because of our party system, we really don't have a cohesive unit. A Democrat from GA-06 and a Democrat from MT-AL will have to be different, and that's okay. Just don't expect huge cohesion in a two-party system and work within the contradictions.
I'm merely pointing out the absurdity of this sort of one-size-fits-all definition of progressivism.
A lot of this I think is a really bad side effect of the nationalization of local politics. I hold the candidates we run in various states and the figures who form the party leadership, including presidential candidates, to vastly different standards. That's not me saying that we need to run "shut down PP" levels of anti-abortion candidates but...they can be quiet on the issue. They can make statements that are ambiguousI think people need to be more okay with the fact that Democrats are a multitude of things and that because of our party system, we really don't have a cohesive unit. A Democrat from GA-06 and a Democrat from MT-AL will have to be different, and that's okay. Just don't expect huge cohesion in a two-party system and work within the contradictions.
I'm merely pointing out the absurdity of this sort of one-size-fits-all definition of progressivism.
What's sad is "Babies' First Election" syndrome is not wearing off for a swath of Dem voters. They are not learning, and it's fucking frustrating.
Populism is and always has been a primarily rural thing.I'm already over it. Saves the Republicans from having to draft up an attack ad. The suburbs are probably the last stronghold where Bernie's unfettered populist message has yet to break through and indoctrinate the masses. Whatever.
I was talking more of a certain Bernard Sanders that seems to have one definition of progressivism when we should be more okay with socially-liberal-fiscally-conservative Dems in suburban districts and socially-conservative-economically-left Dems in rural districts.
This has always been, to me, one of Bernie's biggest weaknesses.
The weird thing about this guy is that you can't even really call Omaha rural right? Like it's obviously not a major metropolis but I imagine it's much more socially liberal than the state as a whole, even if it is pretty white. I doubt they needed to run a pro-life guy even if they wanted to be pragmatic.
I've bounced around a few labels in recent years, and ultimately don't think I've found one I like. Not in some "ugh people who adopt labels are so shallow" way, just I don't think there's any one movement in US politics right now I feel totally comfortable identifying with
The weird thing about this guy is that you can't even really call Omaha rural right? Like it's obviously not a major metropolis but I imagine it's much more socially liberal than the state as a whole, even if it is pretty white. I doubt they needed to run a pro-life guy even if they wanted to be pragmatic.
I think he's just pro-life because he's a Catholic and it's his personal conviction but it seems weird to me that he'd be the candidate as a result. Maybe they just don't have the bench for someone better?
hi i'm from omaha
we're gonna pass the million population mark as of the next census. Also, Democrat mayors can win here, and often do. Our last dem mayor passed a controversial restaurant tax to help fund things the city didn't have money for, the current GOP mayor ran against him and criticized the tax, he got voted out of office for it, and surprise surprise she said she wasn't going to get rid of it because the city needed the money.
and also yeah omaha is not rural at all, it's a sprawling as fuck city, but it's probably one of the few cities where the GOP still has a huge stronghold (basically depends on what side of 72nd street you're on, west is republicans, east of it tends to be democrats)
I think he's just pro-life because he's a Catholic and it's his personal conviction but it seems weird to me that he'd be the candidate as a result. Maybe they just don't have the bench for someone better?
Nebraska's Democratic Party doesn't have the luxury of ideological purity if they want to become relevant. We just lost a Congressional Seat to a nobody.
Omaha is 25% Catholic, with a large fraction of those people being single issue voters(abortion). Mello has a better chance of winning by appealing to the issues voters care about.
Tom Perez, current chair of the DNC, flat out said that the modern Republican party "doesn't give a shit about the poor" and then refused to back down or apologize, so they're basically paraphrasing him.
In other news, I like Tom Perez a lot.
The same judge who Donald Trump smeared as a Mexican during the presidential campaign will preside over the case of the first known recipient of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) protections to be deported.
USA Today first reported that Juan Manuel Montes, 23, would have his lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security heard by Judge Gonzalo Curiel. Curiels assignment to the case was coincidental, the publication reported, as judges are selected based on a rotating schedule.