The Democratic Party is not a "failing establishment".Are you, though? Half your post history is defending status-quo Democrats from left-wing criticism and clinging to a failing establishment in the name of pragmatism.
"Meals on Wheels doesn't show us results!"
WOW.
The Democratic Party is not a "failing establishment".
If you want to help beat the GOP, join. If you don't, you're not helping.
Mulvaney is a monster, holy shit this press conference.
Are you, though? Half your post history is defending status-quo Democrats from left-wing criticism and clinging to a failing establishment in the name of pragmatism.
This is
uhm
not at all a good answer, to me. "This humor that seems offensive is really just ironic" is a huge red flag
It's not remotely appropriate for Amber Frost to be put on trial because of jokes made by her friend. Nick Mullen doesn't have any meaningful connection to her career or the rest of the Chapo Crew.
This sounds a lot like the right-wing skewering of candidate Obama for his relationship to Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers.
But it's the road you go down if you view Democrats as the "True Enemy."Probably not the best road to go down. Pigeon has outlined his philosophy pretty well, especially in regards to the marriage between social and economic justice.
Are you, though? Half your post history is defending status-quo Democrats from left-wing criticism and clinging to a failing establishment in the name of pragmatism.
I don't know who either of these people are. I see a tweet by Nick Mullen that under no circumstances is funny or ironic. I then see I believe Amber Frost explain away this behavior. Not sure what conclusion you want me to draw from this.It's not remotely appropriate for Amber Frost to be put on trial because of jokes made by her friend. Nick Mullen doesn't have any meaningful connection to her career or the rest of the Chapo Crew.
This sounds a lot like the right-wing skewering of candidate Obama for his relationship to Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers.
Fuck starving children I guess.
At least they're being open about being completely heartless.
These answers are heartless. This presser is one of the most bleak in a while.
These answers are heartless. This presser is one of the most bleak in a while.
But it's really compassionate to some hypothetical detroit single moms and coal workers.
The entire western world has had a trans-national global far-right uprising.It absolutely is. Besides being unable to beat the least qualified, least professional presidential candidate ever, the Democratic leadership has seen 900 state legislature seat slip away. The Democrats' slide to the right on everything but civil liberties hasn't helped them at all, and until the Democrats realize this they'll continue to lose.
The Democratic Party is less popular than Donald Trump. This shouldn't be possible.
This guy has three kids on top of everything. How can you ever look them in the face with a mentality like this?
Yup it's basically the same argument that various other defenders of sexism and racism has on the right such as Colin Moriarty - "bit the girlfriends of his close friends like him and are liberal, so it's impossible for him to be racist and or sexist."
That's not even getting into the Chapos circles tendency to look away as their loyal fanbase misogynocally attack any woman slightly to the right of them who criticises them Left in any way.
He got advice from Conway, why don't you talk about all the things trump says that aren't lies?LOL That's Spicer's reply??
.
The other is that actually you just like something that's problematic, you feel defensive about it, and you're throwing out a narrative that feels comfortable to you which allows you to dismiss all social justice critique as coming from "centrists" trying to undermine your ideology, giving you the freedom to like whatever sexist and racist stuff you want without having to self-examine.
I'll let history be the judge.
Are these answers cold as hell or it is just me?
Damn.
And the other half is arguing for the moral necessity of a basic income and saying we need to do something about the economic conditions in Appalachia...in 2012.
I mean I guess there's two possibilities. One is that I'm secretly a centrist who lies about being a socialist constantly and laid a multi-year trail of false evidence by advocating for socialist policies, all so that I could falsely criticize upstanding socialist podcasts by saying their jokes are bigoted.
The other is that actually you just like something that's problematic, you feel defensive about it, and you're throwing out a narrative that feels comfortable to you which allows you to dismiss all social justice critique as coming from "centrists" trying to undermine your ideology, giving you the freedom to like whatever sexist and racist stuff you want without having to self-examine.
I'll let history be the judge.
What is he reading?
What is he reading?
Jesus this is a filibuster.
Jesus this is a filibuster.
Look at all this evidence I just listed, how can you say no evidence?so he's just going to kill time by reading this report...
This isn't about Chapo, Pigeon. It's about your stalwart opposition to left-wing policies in every political discussion.
This isn't about Chapo, Pigeon. It's about your stalwart opposition to left-wing policies in every political discussion. If you earnestly believe that socialism can be achieved through incremental social democratic reforms, fine. But this attitude is unhelpful because the track record for such change is pretty awful. Hard-right conservatives occupy most of our elected offices and are trying to The welfare state in the US is unraveling as inequality spirals out of control.
Radical left-wing change is and has always been necessary to create and preserve inequality, because it gives something bigger for the right to fight against. Divisive grassroots action drove the civil rights movement and labor movement before that, not slow and technocratic reformism.
A left-wing turn in the Democratic Party would not only embrace an insurgent movement of disaffected young voters, thus securing the long-term viability of the Democratic party, but also help ameliorate the horrors that the Republicans are currently wreaking on our country. I don't believe continued advocacy for unpopular and unsuccessful center-left solutions is productive. And I don't believe you can be a socialist while exerting so much energy on shutting down socialist advocacy.
This is basically gamers in a nutshell. All liberals until someone funny makes a rape joke, then it's "you need to lighten up" and "there are bigger issues."
You know, that's funny, because actually it's about Chapo and how they're super problematic, but I guess you'd rather argue about something else. Wonder why?
It absolutely is. Besides being unable to beat the least qualified, least professional presidential candidate ever, the Democratic leadership has seen 900 state legislature seat slip away. The Democrats' slide to the right on everything but civil liberties hasn't helped them at all, and until the Democrats realize this they'll continue to lose.
The Democratic Party is less popular than Donald Trump. This shouldn't be possible.
This isn't about Chapo, Pigeon. It's about your stalwart opposition to left-wing policies in every political discussion. If you earnestly believe that socialism can be achieved through incremental social democratic reforms, fine. But this attitude is unhelpful because the track record for such change is pretty awful. Hard-right conservatives occupy most of our elected offices and are trying to The welfare state in the US is unraveling as inequality spirals out of control.
Radical left-wing change is and has always been necessary to create and preserve inequality, because it gives something bigger for the right to fight against. Divisive grassroots action drove the civil rights movement and labor movement before that, not slow and technocratic reformism.
A left-wing turn in the Democratic Party would not only embrace an insurgent movement of disaffected young voters, thus securing the long-term viability of the Democratic party, but also help ameliorate the horrors that the Republicans are currently wreaking on our country. I don't believe continued advocacy for unpopular and unsuccessful center-left solutions is productive. And I don't believe you can be a socialist while exerting so much energy on shutting down socialist advocacy.
The other is that actually you just like something that's problematic, you feel defensive about it, and you're throwing out a narrative that feels comfortable to you which allows you to dismiss all social justice critique as coming from "centrists" trying to undermine your ideology, giving you the freedom to like whatever sexist and racist stuff you want without having to self-examine.