Cause with seniority comes power, and because Clinton was eating up a massive amount of oxygen in the room.Just an example, why doesn't someone like Joe Kennedy from Massachusetts get pushed into the foreground?
Cause with seniority comes power, and because Clinton was eating up a massive amount of oxygen in the room.Just an example, why doesn't someone like Joe Kennedy from Massachusetts get pushed into the foreground?
To be completely cynical, I'm glad this is happening under any Republican president, but especially Trump.I hope it happens under this fucking con man's term, assuming he gets four years. All of those dweebs thinking Trump alone fixed the economy seeing that same ideal turn into ash.
We needed UBI when it was proposed under Nixon. Now it's just getting toxic to lack it.
Don't think for one fucking second Ford is alone in what they're doing, or even if it's just happening in their own industry. It's a looming global trend.
The dominos are already falling, albeit slowly. But they will fall in exponentials, given enough time.
Remember Barack Obama's words: his successor would be the first President in world history handling an AI/automation revolution.
We have the most ill-equipped person and cabinet on Earth to deal with this...
WSJ says that's about 20,000 people, potentially.So much winning
WSJ says that's about 20,000 people, potentially.
In all seriousness, for the protection of sources' lives and our national security in general, can they stop giving Trump classified briefings? He does nothing with that information other than give it to Russians.
what were his margins in the rust belt
To be completely cynical, I'm glad this is happening under any Republican president, but especially Trump.
Imagine Clinton being in office right now and any major job loss being attributed to her. Republicans control Congress so there would be no incentive to cooperate there, and Democrats take a hit for presiding over another bad recession.
Instead it's Trump who creates the very real possibility that Democrats sweep the midterm elections and the next presidential, giving us a fresh start in 2021.
Considering that it's 10% of their *global* workforce, I don't think it's going to translate into a statistically sizable amount of jobs in the US. Although if most of their US workforce is stationed in, say, Michigan, it might have an outsized effect in one state.
Considering that it's 10% of their *global* workforce, I don't think it's going to translate into a statistically sizable amount of jobs in the US. Although if most of their US workforce is stationed in, say, Michigan, it might have an outsized effect in one state.
Yeah I'm just kinda spitballing really. I know it's not a 1-1 thing but kind of a useful metric for me as we speed into the brick wall that is automation.
Considering that it's 10% of their *global* workforce, I don't think it's going to translate into a statistically sizable amount of jobs in the US. Although if most of their US workforce is stationed in, say, Michigan, it might have an outsized effect in one state.
This is the thing w/ free trade/globalization. The benefits are spread across all, the losses are dense and localized.We keep hearing about coal jobs and there's only 75,000 of them nationwide. A small number of vocal people can make a lot of noise
To be completely cynical, I'm glad this is happening under any Republican president, but especially Trump.
Imagine Clinton being in office right now and any major job loss being attributed to her. Republicans control Congress so there would be no incentive to cooperate there, and Democrats take a hit for presiding over another bad recession.
Instead it's Trump who creates the very real possibility that Democrats sweep the midterm elections and the next presidential, giving us a fresh start in 2021.
This is the thing w/ free trade/globalization. The benefits are spread across all, the losses are dense and localized.
We keep hearing about coal jobs and there's only 75,000 of them nationwide. A small number of vocal people can make a lot of noise
Still, among reporters who cover the White House, on-the-record statements from Trumps White House carry little weight because Trump has told hundreds of falsehoods, tracked by PolitiFact and other websites. Sometimes, in a single campaign-style rally, the president will say more than a dozen things that are not true or lack all context. He has made unsubstantiated claims, like saying former President Barack Obama put a tapp on his phones at Trump Tower.
You need to reserve credibility for when it matters when a call comes in late in the day and you need to be able to say to a reporter, all the jousting back and forth aside, 'Ive never lied to you about something and this isnt true,' said Loeser.
If youve blown your credibility on crowd size or semantics, people say: What else are they going to lie about?
The progressive groups that Hillary's new PAC Onward Together has chosen to fund:
Swing Left
Emerge America
Color of Change
Indivisible
Run for Something
Yeah, I love how she handled the majority as speaker. She got a lot of good shit passed (which then died in the Senate). But I cringe during most speaking/ interviews I see with her. And I don't think I overuse cringe.
Still I respect her actions and effectiveness.
I read on twitter where someone was comparing the job losses of Coal industry with the job losses in Newspaper industry in 90's and 00's. The latter's losses were more disruptive and in higher numbers compared to Coal, but there was never any political discussion or political persuasion mainly because the losses were mostly in big liberal cities like New York, SF, Chicago, etc.
Got to get ready for that tax repatriation holiday.So much winning
More
Tues. 9:30 AM: "THE PRESIDENT will speak with King Abdullah II of Jordan by telephone."
Got out of work an hour ago, and it really seems like this story has blown up even more than the Comey story, at least online. Yikes!
The White House decided to spell out exactly which ally we betrayed.
So much winning
Watched Anderson Cooper... they speculated between Jordan and Israel....The White House decided to spell out exactly which ally we betrayed.
https://twitter.com/jacobkornbluh/status/864326107578978305
The White House decided to spell out exactly which ally we betrayed.
https://twitter.com/jacobkornbluh/status/864326107578978305
So I guess we can add another one to the list of enemies Trump has made:
- Free Press
- moderates
- liberals
- NATO allies
- neoconservatives
- Bushes
- FBI
- IC
- Foreign Allied IC
- Israel
- Iraq
- Jordan
Strength. Leadership. Very good brain.@maggieNYT said:Prior to the Wapo story, Trump spent day phoning outside advisers, saying he knows he has to make changes but isn't certain what to do.
Prior to the Wapo story, Trump spent day phoning outside advisers, saying he knows he has to make changes but isn't certain what to do.
Almost like he's a guy with no leadership or government experience somehow in the most important government position in the country
"We need an outsider to shake things up"Almost like he's a guy with no leadership or government experience somehow in the most important government position in the country
Resign. It's pretty fucking simple.
Trump becoming liberal in a last ditch effort to save his presidency confirmed.
Can he fire pence, name Clinton his Vp, and then resign?
"We need an outsider to shake things up"
-- idiots
Technically yes, but she'd have to be confirmed by the Senate.
Technically yes, but she'd have to be confirmed by the Senate.
Foreign Leaders Have Realized Trump Is a Pushover
The presidents reported disclosure of classified information to Russia is only the latest example of the self-proclaimed great negotiator conceding to officials from overseas everything they want.
Russian Foreign Ministry Photo via AP
DAVID A. GRAHAM MAY 15, 2017
While Trump is a moron, McMaster is pretty smart, right? Could he have worded his statement deliberately to confirm WaPo's reporting?
He said the story is false "as reported". That could mean WaPo got a minor detail wrong.