Because it's a stupid shot at me over a normal local race when the Sunbelt talk is about the future of the EC and gaining back the house.Uh... why is a post about New Hampshire making you talk about the Sunbelt?
Because it's a stupid shot at me over a normal local race when the Sunbelt talk is about the future of the EC and gaining back the house.Uh... why is a post about New Hampshire making you talk about the Sunbelt?
Wapo said:President Trump labeled North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un a madman with nuclear weapons during a private phone conversation with Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte last month, just days before stating publicly that he would be honored to meet with Kim.
In the April 29 call, Trump sought Dutertes input on whether Kim is stable or not stable and expressed some satisfaction in North Koreas recent failed missile tests, noting that all his rockets are crashing. Thats the good news, according to a transcript of the conversation made by the Philippines government on May 2 and obtained Tuesday by The Washington Post.
Wapo said:Toward the end of the call, Trump switched topics to invite Duterte to the White House, calling him a good man.
I will love to have you in the Oval Office, Trump said. Any time you want to come Seriously, if you want to come over, just let us know. Just take care of yourself, and we will take care of North Korea.
Because it's a stupid shot at me over a normal local race when the Sunbelt talk is about the future of the EC and gaining back the house.
I wish people cared enough about helping win races in my own state to take petty shots at people but oh well
how does one lose a ravewinning raves
how does one lose a rave
I believe this is the first time ever Wolfeboro is going to be represented by a Democrat, at least since a long time.Oh, and we just flipped our first seat since the election in a SE
this constituency went 51-44 for Trump last year
No, I compared economic changes that have been occurring due to technological advancement, globalization ,and free trade for the past 40 years to Global Warming.You just compared Hillary Clinton 16-esque Demographics as Destiny to Global Warming, let's chill on calling something stupid.
how does one lose a rave
No, I compared economic changes that have been occurring due to technological advancement, globalization ,and free trade for the past 40 years to Global Warming.
You really don't see the difference?
how does one lose a rave
Oh, and we just flipped our first seat since the election in a SE
this constituency went 51-44 for Trump last year
No, I compared economic changes that have been occurring due to technological advancement, globalization ,and free trade for the past 40 years to Global Warming.
You really don't see the difference?
I care about winning races anywhere including the sunbelt and New Hampshire but okay!
To be completely honest, I don't believe that anyone here would ever think about a race in Mississippi more than one in a swing state. I simply do not believe you.
ECONOMICS IS A SCIENCE! These changes are in large part a result of radical economic change because of mass technological progress over the past decades! We keep seeing the same thing happen everywhere. This isn't an accident. West Virginia, East Iowa, Upstate NY.Okay I'll finally say what I deleted multiple times.
This is such a stupid post I actually can't believe you're serious in comparing political "destiny" to climate change. Nothing is constant in politics! How have you failed to grasp this over the past two years?
Honestly, I'm still laughing that you think mapping political outcomes three years from now is the same thing as HISTORICAL SCIENTIFIC DATA OF CLIMATE CHANGE. Politics isn't a science! Don't treat it like one!
To be completely honest, I don't believe that anyone here would ever think about a race in Mississippi more than one in a swing state. I simply do not believe you.
To be completely honest, I don't believe that anyone here would ever think about a race in Mississippi more than one in a swing state. I simply do not believe you.
Here's somethin!
ECONOMICS IS A SCIENCE! These changes are in large part a result of radical economic change because of mass technological progress over the past decades! We keep seeing the same thing happen everywhere. This isn't an accident. West Virginia, East Iowa, Upstate NY.
It's not destiny! There is not "permanent GOP/Dem majority" nationwide possible! The pendulum will always be swinging. The gameboard will always be changing. This is one of the lessons of 2010, also a lesson about the firewall getting breached.
But to win the game, you need to see where things are evolving to. Not where they've been. Change is constant, but it only goes one way.
okay well are there any legislature races in MS on the horizon? I can't think of any. We have a SoS race here in October. I would assume the D will run ahead of Hillary if trends continue.
What is your point? I'm not predicting outcomes. I'm looking at where we're likely to have the best odds of winning elections and actually gaining power and being able to implement our agenda! Regardless of who the nominee is!Literally none of this addresses my point besides "economics is a science" which is not true, so, okay.
Again, we should be blessed none of you actually work in politics or campaigns.
I include myself because I'm also stupid.
I honestly think the NY Dem establishment prefers the current situation. Cuomo can get what he wants, and if they don't want to do something that's too progressive they have an easy scapegoat.if I'm looking up the right special elections, there's one for the senate and one for the assembly right? too bad the pickup chance is in the assembly, not the senate.
also on the subject of the New York state senate, can anyone explain to me why the New York Democrats don't just deny ballot access to the IDC in elections after what they pulled?
"anyone" was a bit vague as we've specifically talked about this. But in general when people here usually talk about running in every race or something similar, I doubt heavily that they actually mean that. And that's fair! But I don't see any point in taking shots at people over something that they ultimately agree on, if not where they draw the line on which races they get passionate about.
What is your point? I'm not predicting outcomes. I'm looking at where we're likely to have the best odds of winning elections and actually gaining power and being able to implement our agenda! Regardless of who the nominee is!
No fucking way Lieberman makes it through Senate approval.
Depends actually if there is a possibility of maximizing the "southern blue line" into outvoting the rest of the state.
I mean we almost won tennessee's senate seat back in 2006.
GOP Senate? Oh yes he will.
I'd be interested to see if the Working Families Party tries to run anyone against the IDC members like they did in Connecticut when they thought the Democrat running was shitty so they had Gomes run (and win) instead.I honestly think the NY Dem establishment prefers the current situation. Cuomo can get what he wants, and if they don't want to do something that's too progressive they have an easy scapegoat.
NYDP is pretty corrupt I'm afraid, exactly why we need nonpartisan redistricting. Politicians that can draw their own maps are only interested in protecting themselves.
I'd be interested to see if the Working Families Party tries to run anyone against the IDC members like they did in Connecticut when they thought the Democrat running was shitty so they had Gomes run (and win) instead.
If things trend like they did the last few times a GOP pres tanked his numbers into the 6th Circle of Hell, we're likely going to be able to run candidates all over the place, even in places that are normally inhospitable for Democratic life! Because that's how the game works - our electorate is reactionary as f.I don't think trying to win everywhere you can is a radical idea but idk. A lot of people today felt comfortable making declarations about strategy three years from now. That's silly.
If things trend like they did the last few times a GOP pres tanked his numbers into the 6th Circle of Hell, we're likely going to be able to run candidates all over the place, even in places that are normally inhospitable for Democratic life! Because that's how the game works - our electorate is reactionary as f.
This really is insane:
Not so sure about that - even a lot of GOPs don't like Lieberman, not to mention many of them want someone who's been in actual law enforcement, not just some prosecutor.GOP Senate? Oh yes he will.
OMG look at the first tweet they chose for this article
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/05/hes...t-calls-islam-one-of-worlds-great-faiths/amp/
Not so sure about that - even a lot of GOPs don't like Lieberman, not to mention many of them want someone who's been in actual law enforcement, not just some prosecutor.
He's also been an elected official.
Then the fact that he works for a firm that represents Trump would be the 4th strike.
OMG look at the first tweet they chose for this article
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/05/hes...t-calls-islam-one-of-worlds-great-faiths/amp/
Maybe Cuomo's Women's Equality Party can get some candidates elected!I'd be interested to see if the Working Families Party tries to run anyone against the IDC members like they did in Connecticut when they thought the Democrat running was shitty so they had Gomes run (and win) instead.
They sent out the "Trump has already been impeached May 23 2017" robocalls by mistake.Omg they have Pence doing robocalls in Montana instead of Trump.
A couple NY special elections tonight too. Polls close in 12 minutes.
Omg they have Pence doing robocalls in Montana instead of Trump.
Where are all these special elections coming from. Are they Congressional or state level?
state level. The only federal elections are KS-4 (done), CA-34 (can't remember if the second round happened or not), GA-6, MT-AL, and SC-5 and the Alabama senate seat.Where are all these special elections coming from. Are they Congressional or state level?
I don't think trying to win everywhere you can is a radical idea but idk. A lot of people today felt comfortable making declarations about strategy three years from now. That's silly.
You made declarations about 2020 and where to spend money when it's MAY OF TWO THOUSAND AND SEVENTEEN IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD and for all your preaching about the "science" (Jesus Christ) of economics, you, me, my mother, and Kellyanne Conway have literally no idea about what the environment will look like, so writing off any potential swing state, like you so gleefully seem to want to do? is very silly! I want to win races! I don't want to give up on places because I'm 2017 it seemed like a good idea.
Mississippi is so racially polarizing. Then again so is the rest of the states surrounding. The only way your winning in our area is if the white population disappeared over night leaving just blacks left or realistically a coalition of blacks + a plurality of white. A lof of the whites millennials who would eventually make up a future coalition to make us blue (provided blacks continue voting D 90%) leave the states for liberal pastures or vote R like their parents and grandparents. Who knows if Gen Z will do the same.
The opposite is happening in Virginia and now Georgia where there are jobs that liberal whites in the north want to come down and work/live making those states purple.