whyamihere
Banned
I mean isn't that Romneycare?I honestly don't know the law here, but maybe. Then again, the mandate isn't popular so the odds of any one state trying to keep it are low.
I mean isn't that Romneycare?I honestly don't know the law here, but maybe. Then again, the mandate isn't popular so the odds of any one state trying to keep it are low.
I mean isn't that Romneycare?
Has there been any real alternative that could supplant the mandate? Surely some think tank that's sane has offered suggestions?
I think one of the biggest issues to why healthcare is so tricky is the relationship between insurance and hospitals and how the public is kept of that loop. There's like zero transparency on price for example. I remember watching a video of some Vox guy try to find out how much his baby's delivery would cost and like he couldn't get a breakdown.
Has there been any real alternative that could supplant the mandate? Surely some think tank that's sane has offered suggestions?
For the BRCA, they wanted to do a six month waiting period on people buying individual plans if they didn't have continuous coverage. The parliamentarian ruled that's in violation of the Bryd rule.
I think one of the biggest issues to why healthcare is so tricky is the relationship between insurance and hospitals and how the public is kept of that loop. There's like zero transparency on price for example. I remember watching a video of some Vox guy try to find out how much his baby's delivery would cost and like he couldn't get a breakdown.
For the BRCA, they wanted to do a six month waiting period on people buying individual plans if they didn't have continuous coverage. The parliamentarian ruled that's in violation of the Bryd rule.
That's exactly why healthcare doesn't work on "freedom" like the Republicans try and say it does. Healthcare ain't like walking into a fucking McDonald's. They don't give you prices. You don't know the quality. And you fucking need it to be done. It's not the same market as a lot of the things we purchase and can't be treated the same way.
I remember when I was young and naive trying to get a price for some dentistry work and I just couldn't.
Especially when you can now just point to him voting for the actual bill lolProbably a bad idea to argue for hours with /r/neoliberal subreddit about how people have the right to be angry, pissed, and say mean things about John McCain and that a motion to proceed vote isn't pointless.
Reading a headline that says that Republicans failed outright to repeal the thing they've said they'd repeal for 7 years 43-57 makes me feel marginally better. That is still a pretty big deal regardless. In other words, we're beyond the -absolute- worst case scenario now!
Haven't been following this too closely because too much politics nowadays just gets depressing.Reading a headline that says that Republicans failed outright to repeal the thing they've said they'd repeal for 7 years 43-57 makes me feel marginally better. That is still a pretty big deal regardless. In other words, we're beyond the -absolute- worst case scenario now!
Worst case scenario is probably repeal only (but keep all the regulations). They are probably voting on that tommorrow. Though I don't think there is any way they pass it.
Haven't been following this too closely because too much politics nowadays just gets depressing.
Sounds like some good news, quick summary?
My understanding was that taking these votes that they knew would fail was a condition for some of the republicans to vote for the MTP -- like Rand Paul would want to have a vote on straight repeal so he can use it to campaign for himself. Without these failed votes, MTP apparently would not have happened.43 votes on a bill that needed 60 (hence, no real danger of it actually passing) is quite interesting. It largely means those 6 senators don't want to be on record voting for it.
Makes me wonder what the hell turtle actually wants to get out of this.
Was anyone really clamouring for BCRA to get a vote? I suspect McConnell as a point of pride.My understanding was that taking these votes that they knew would fail was a condition for some of the republicans to vote for the MTP -- like Rand Paul would want to have a vote on straight repeal so he can use it to campaign for himself. Without these failed votes, MTP apparently would not have happened.
It was a winding, wonkish and occasionally obscure conversation about foreign coal exploration, natural-gas pipelines and pig manure as a power source.
But only one of the men on the line Energy Secretary Rick Perry held sway over his nations energy policy. On the other end of the conversation were Vladimir Vovan Kuznetsov and Alexei Lexus Stolyarov, who had just added Perry to their list of high-profile hoax victims.
Secretary Perry is the latest target of two Russian pranksters, DOE Spokeswoman Shaylyn Hynes said in an email to The Washington Post. These individuals are known for pranking high level officials and celebrities, particularly those who are supportive of an agenda that is not in line with their governments. In this case, the energy security of Ukraine.
During the conversation, which was posted in its entirety on Vesti, a Russian news site, Perry was convinced he was talking to the Ukrainian Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman, who appears to speak through a translator. Perry talked about a potential pipeline across the Baltic sea for Russian gas, cyber attacks on the U.S. power grid, natural-gas exploration in Ukraine and the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord.
Perhaps the only giveaway about the true nature of the call was a statement the Ukrainian prime minister made about a new biofuel invented by Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, according to the Pravda Report newspaper.
The fuel was made from a mix of home-brewed alcohol and pig manure.
Perry said hed like to get more information about the scientific development.
interesting that Marco Rubio has seemingly avoided being discussed throughout all of this. Haven't even heard his name in months.
I stopped giving a shit after Christie ethered him from existence.
Though I halfway expected him to pop off at the mouth during The Beaching (perhaps my favorite ever name for a scandal).
interesting that Marco Rubio has seemingly avoided being discussed throughout all of this. Haven't even heard his name in months.
Pence added a +1 to get to 51-50 on the motion to proceed. This is bad, of course. The two expecteds went nay, but Rand Paul and Heller went for, after getting baited and being bought off by casino moguls, respectively.Sounds like some good news, quick summary?
His career has plateaued. It's even uncertain if he will be a career senator at this point.interesting that Marco Rubio has seemingly avoided being discussed throughout all of this. Haven't even heard his name in months.
That was a classic.I stopped giving a shit after Christie ethered him from existence.
Though I halfway expected him to pop off at the mouth during The Beaching (perhaps my favorite ever name for a scandal).
Yeah, I was somewhat impressed with his line of questioning.. especially on Tillerson. He still voted for him so whatever. But still. I'm impressed he isn't even so much as doing the "I'm going to denounce something before voting for it", shtick. He might as well be in the bushes with Spicey he's avoiding the spotlight so muchIf there is one thing that follows him around it's he is lazy as fuck. He wanted to seem like the big dude in the confirmation hearings but it's too much work to actually follow up and continue.
John McCain is a bastard of the highest order and I've never rooted against a guy with likely terminal brain cancer before yesterday
Arizona's Republican governor (and the former Republican governor) is against the BCRA as Arizona is a Medicaid expansion state. McCain (and Flake for that matter) voted for if anyway.
GQ had a nice takedown of McCain shortly after his votes tonight.
John McCain Is the Perfect American Lie
Geez, people are really railing against McCain. Was moving the bill to debate really that bad? To me it seems like a move to try and return the Senate to normalcy, where you don't have to agree with a bill to allow it to enter the floor.
Geez, people are really railing against McCain. Was moving the bill to debate really that bad? To me it seems like a move to try and return the Senate to normalcy, where you don't have to agree with a bill to allow it to enter the floor.
Geez, people are really railing against McCain. Was moving the bill to debate really that bad? To me it seems like a move to try and return the Senate to normalcy, where you don't have to agree with a bill to allow it to enter the floor.
McCain is a fucking disgrace. He will be "concerned" as millions of people are stripped of their insurance and thousands die due to the Republicans ignoring every convention he claims to hold so dear, and then when the Democrats try and fix it in a bipartisan and open way he will claim they are destroying government. Pathetic, self-aggrandising, and disgraceful.
Geez, people are really railing against McCain. Was moving the bill to debate really that bad? To me it seems like a move to try and return the Senate to normalcy, where you don't have to agree with a bill to allow it to enter the floor.
Geez, people are really railing against McCain. Was moving the bill to debate really that bad? To me it seems like a move to try and return the Senate to normalcy, where you don't have to agree with a bill to allow it to enter the floor.
McCain specifically said "I will not vote for that bill" in his big speechGeez, people are really railing against McCain. Was moving the bill to debate really that bad? To me it seems like a move to try and return the Senate to normalcy, where you don't have to agree with a bill to allow it to enter the floor.
So did the healthcare pass yesterday?
Attacking someone whose vote you need is really stupid
How do you intimidate someone who won a write in election...