Officerrob
Banned
But it will link them to the inevitable collapse of the market. You can't blame Obama while touting your victory at the same time.
They will try
But it will link them to the inevitable collapse of the market. You can't blame Obama while touting your victory at the same time.
From a conservative ideological perspective or from a GOP political perspective, it's really shitty. It doesn't give them room on tax cuts, it puts them even more on the hook for market collapse, and it doesn't particularly cut the welfare state. That's why I think the conference bill will be something bigger.
In other news Rep. Luke Messer just announced he's challenging Donnelly for IN Senate.
But it will link them to the inevitable collapse of the market. You can't blame Obama while touting your victory at the same time.
Seems like not a great candidate with residency concerns, plus his wife making $240k a year from the City of Fishers to do, uh, legal consulting.
That's what I don't get.
Trump's plan to do nothing and just sabotage the markets internally literally makes more sense.
With this they're getting on record with a vote on health care. That's all the public will see.
Which is not really a win such goddamn mess.They are up against a catch 22. Doing nothing and waiting means you failed in the eyes of the people who voted for you. No one is going to sit around waiting for the market to collapse and keep voting in republicans telling you it will collapse and screw you over and then replace it. Skinny will speed the process up though which jeopardizes them even sooner but also gives them a "win"
If skinny passes, insurers are going to skyrocket premiums next month.
A "win" at this point simply means "passing something with the word repeal in the bill". They could call it the Obama is the Greatest President Ever and Oh Yeah Repeal Reconciliation Act of 2017 and all that would matter is that they could campaign that they kept their promise to "repeal".
The skinny repeal is expected to be voted on FridayHow long is the vote o rama gonna last? And yeah, Lindsey said he was against Skinny Repeal yesterday.
It would, but now that Rand has had his clean repeal voted down and signaled that he's open to more, with him + Moran + Lee, they'd only need to pick off Murkowski or Capito to get a more aggressive Medicaid-cutting m bill through that would allow for their tax bill as well. And I just don't have that much faith in all three moderate darlings. One or two? Sure. But not all three.But that conference bill would then have to go back through the whole process again. Also keep in mind that they're still taking their recess and they still have to start working on taxes and the budget.
Frank Thorp V‏Verified account @frankthorp 11m11 minutes ago
More
Replying to @frankthorp
Dem health care motion to send health care bill to committees FAILS (as expected) on a party line vote, 48-50.
They'll all just quit the exchanges.
Republican Nos on full repeal:
Alexander - TN
is skinny repeal like a skinny marg
Of course.Mavericking gone :-\
This process is literally, "We can't get anything else passed, so lets just piece this bill that covers a sixth of the economy together over 48 hours and vote on it". Just imagine if the Dems were doing this...
Someone needs to make a thread over on OT about the "Skinny Repeal" because half of the posters seem to think this is over.
Yeah. Gloating over the failure of full repeal when every Republican knew it was DOA.
At least one tastes goodOnly in that they both cause cancer
Who abstained tho? Collins and Murk?Mavericking gone :-
tbf, Trump was going to do skinny repeal through executive action pretty much anyway.
This just means Congress can't get away with it.
Sometimes I think OT needs an all-encompassing civics thread - not political discussion and focus on actual races and policies, but just a primer on how government actually fucking works. Our education system has failed in that regard, and unfortunately, a lot of people lack the time or intellectual curiosity to learn on their own. (Strange, considering how this forum prides itself on being educated and liberal... but whatever.)
Who abstained tho? Collins and Murk?
They'll all just quit the exchanges.
That's the shitty thing about it. The ACA will be not be able to be saved even if democrats gain full control
What do we think is going to happen should Dems have the White House, the House, and 50+ Senators after the 2020 Elections?
Sometimes I think OT needs an all-encompassing civics thread - not political discussion and focus on actual races and policies, but just a primer on how government actually fucking works. Our education system has failed in that regard, and unfortunately, a lot of people lack the time or intellectual curiosity to learn on their own. (Strange, considering how this forum prides itself on being educated and liberal... but whatever.)
I would be willing to help make one of these, if it comes to this.
Though I don't think anyone here is ready to either write or read about the arcane Senate rules and whatnot.
Who abstained tho? Collins and Murk?
Frank Thorp V‏Verified account
@frankthorp
Follow
More
Dem health care motion to send health care bill to committees FAILS (as expected) on a party line vote, 48-52.
Mike Sacks‏Verified account
@MikeSacksEsq
So that "skinny repeal" of pretty much just the individual mandate has me thinking about the SCOTUS dissent in the 2012 Obamacare case.
Mike Sacks‏Verified account @MikeSacksEsq 28m28 minutes ago
Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito found the mandate unconstitutional, but believed it too integral to the ACA to let rest of law stand.
Mike Sacks‏Verified account
@MikeSacksEsq
The dissenters believed the ACA would be so catastrophically unworkable without the individual mandate that the whole law must fall instead.
Mike Sacks‏Verified account @MikeSacksEsq 23m23 minutes ago
They believed killing the mandate would bring "unnecessary risks and avoidable uncertainties...hostile to...safety & welfare of the Nation"
Mike Sacks‏Verified account @MikeSacksEsq 22m22 minutes ago
"If those risks and uncertainties are to be imposed, it must not be by the Judiciary." And true enough, the Senate's choosing to impose them
Mike Sacks‏Verified account @MikeSacksEsq 19m19 minutes ago
So should Senate GOP pass, and House GOP agrees to, and POTUS sign this "skinny repeal," who's responsible for its risks & uncertainties?
Sometimes I think OT needs an all-encompassing civics thread - not political discussion and focus on actual races and policies, but just a primer on how government actually fucking works. Our education system has failed in that regard, and unfortunately, a lot of people lack the time or intellectual curiosity to learn on their own. (Strange, considering how this forum prides itself on being educated and liberal... but whatever.)
What do we think is going to happen should Dems have the White House, the House, and 50+ Senators after the 2020 Elections?
What do we think is going to happen should Dems have the White House, the House, and 50+ Senators after the 2020 Elections?
Someone needs to make a thread over on OT about the "Skinny Repeal" because half of the posters seem to think this is over.