Mackenzie 92
Member
They're gonna ram it through somehow.
No PP defunding, no house vote. It has to be in there.Byrd rule violations dont make the whole thing require 60 votes, just whatever provisions are found in violation
Has anyone asked Rand Paul about this? He's not going to like some of the additional funding stuff
Lawrence O'Donnell is straight up murdering the Mooch right now. Verbally.
Well I'm sure he "won't like it" before he votes for it. As he always does.
He was a no before Collins was during this whole process. Only recently when it looked like a clean repeal was on the table did he switch, and he was open to a skinny repeal, but not one that included additional junk as this one does.I thought Rand Paul was one of the consistent 'no's until recently.
PP defunding passed the parliamentarian in 2015.
Maybe they think they can get it passed.
Or maybe they plan to just steamroll the parliamentarian.
If they override it they're fucked. The next Dem majority we get, we're going to get that welfare state they so thoroughly hate.
This was literally ruled on last week! It was found to violate the Byrd Rule!
Why debate when the bill needs 60 unless they plan on overruling her? This bill isn't "skinny". Fuck I actually think it might be worse than the BRCA.
The next time the Dems get majority they'll insist on working together with Repubs and we'll be back where we started. As a Dem I wish I had more confidence in my own party but I don't.
Why debate when the bill needs 60 unless they plan on overruling her? This bill isn't "skinny". Fuck I actually think it might be worse than the BRCA.
Parliamentarian rules by language, not by, like, sense of the bill.
Maybe they found different language that has the same effect.
Or maybe they're just yoloing. Who knows! Not me!
It's not really that simpleCatch people off guard late at night with Paul Ryan guarantees and get them to vote yes. Not a bad move...for a turtle.
What? The Dems have been as effective as they can be in ensuring the GOP gets as little through as possible. They may be a lot of things, but they haven't been spineless here.
What? The Dems have been as effective as they can be in ensuring the GOP gets as little through as possible. They may be a lot of things, but they haven't been spineless here.
Plus if it weren't for Dems we wouldn't have the ACA in the first place. Everything is terrible right now because, you know, McConnell is doing everything it seems he can to shove his bullshit down our throats.
If Reid had been as ruthless as McConnell is being now, we could've had an ACA with a public option.
I thought Rand Paul was one of the consistent 'no's until recently.
If Reid had been as ruthless as McConnell is being now, we could've had an ACA with a public option.
Enough time to protest the parliamentary for a ruling.This bill is going to pass. Too little tine to sway. They're voting on it in like 2 hours.
This bill is going to pass. Too little tine to sway. They're voting on it in like 2 hours.
@IanSams
Murray, Murphy, Tester, Brown and Manchin all speak in a row, urging regular order consideration of health bill in the relevant committees.
This bill would blow open pre-existing condition coverage as well.
@mkraju
CBO score on this bill has NOT been released publicly
Do they need 60 or 50 votes to pass this?
It NEEDS 60 unless they nuke the filibuster.
Do they need 60 or 50 votes to pass this?
Looks like it's been scored but not yet released wtf?
The next time the Dems get majority they'll insist on working together with Repubs and we'll be back where we started. As a Dem I wish I had more confidence in my own party but I don't.
Not necessarily see above
Not necessarily, the BCRA ended up needing 60 and they were ready to vote on that on a moments noticeIf it needed 60 they wouldn't be voting tonight.