I've thought about that but I really don't want to give Palin the glory of being the nominee even if it means an easy Obama winlawblob said:I suppose a Palin 2012 run would actually be good for us, it would be evidence of how whacked out and marginalized the GOP becomes in the next four years.
To be honset I think its going to be between Huckabee, Romney, Newt. I don't even think Palin will run.Steve Youngblood said:If McCain loses, and Palin is a legitimate contender in the 2012 Republican primaries, I'll eat my hat.
MobiusPigeon said:OMG Palin is on Rush Limbaugh! :lol i thought it was one of his cooks calling in at first. are they purposely trying destroy any chances they have left?
I'm not making a value call on whether or not I do or don't think she should run, I'm honestly just saying that I don't see it happening. It's been my assertion all along that once the poll numbers started to drop for McCain, and the "Palin Effect" had run its course, that was the end of her relevance in national politics. She was thrown up there for the novelty she brought to the ticket, and if McCain loses, then that means the gambit failed and she's back to being a nobody. Aside from rallying the base, she brings nothing to the table. The idea that she's a rising start is absurd.lawblob said:I suppose a Palin 2012 run would actually be good for us, it would be evidence of how whacked out and marginalized the GOP becomes in the next four years.
Justin Bailey said:There's no way in hell the national GOP ever gets near Palin again after this election.
Aside from rallying the base, she brings nothing to the table.
Add Matthew Dowd to the growing list of senior Republican advisers rebuking Sen. John McCain.
Dowd, chief strategist for President George W. Bush’s reelection, fingered Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s nomination as a turning point in McCain’s slide.
“They didn’t allow John McCain to pick the person he wanted for Vice President,” Dowd said, referring to Sen. Joe Lieberman, which undercut his experience argument and tethered McCain to the GOP base.
“He knows in his gut he put somebody unqualified on the ballot,” Dowd stressed, “and put the country at risk.”
Dowd also said the Palin pick, in contrast to Sen. Barack Obama’s choice of Sen. Joe Biden as his running mate, showed voters which candidate was “serious” about governing.
The sharp assessment was issued at a Tuesday panel at the TimeWarner summit, a two-day gathering of politicos and reporters in Manhattan. (I also spoke at the conference.)
Dowd was rebutted by Mark McKinnon, a former strategist for Bush and McCain, who said no one knows what is in McCain’s head regarding his V.P. pick.
Dowd also knocked McCain’s strategic acumen, arguing that the campaign is “very tactical and not strategic,” flatly saying, “I don’t get the narrative.”
Since his time campaigning for Bush, Dowd went public with his opposition to the Bush administration’s record and the Iraq war.
Fox318 said:To be honset I think its going to be between Huckabee, Romney, Newt. I don't even think Palin will run.
Maybe. But I honestly don't think she's going to be anywhere near as popular if and when McCain gets destroyed on November 4th.Fragamemnon said:Except winning primaries, which is a really big deal.
Country First! (?)saelz8 said:
Huh? McCain won his primary long before Palin was on the scene.Fragamemnon said:Except winning primaries, which is a really big deal.
Hellcrow said:Hey guys!
Just wondering, has Obama made up his mind on Israel. Will he likely step up against Israel if they start doing seriously stupid shit like a massive attack on Iran or something like that?
Hellcrow said:Hey guys!
Just wondering, has Obama made up his mind on Israel. Will he likely step up against Israel if they start doing seriously stupid shit like a massive attack on Iran or something like that?
Did he EVER mention the Troopergate report? Last I saw (I only read Drudge when GAF is posting from there) he never mentioned it.Tamanon said:BTW, Drudge has officially used more headline space on the Dem Rep sex "scandal" than he ever used on Troopergate. I am shocked at this development
I chuckled upon reading these words, not sure why...Fragamemnon said:The GOP will nominate someone "electable" who will then be destroyed by the same sort of ruthless Obama campaign as in 2008, only this time with the advantage of incumbency and a bully pulpit.
No candidate would say anything like that and expect to be elected. He may feel that way but would never say it. And I think Israel realizes it might not be a smart idea to do such an attack. (They'll threaten it but I doubt they would do it . . . this is not the same as their attack on Iraq many years ago.)Hellcrow said:Hey guys!
Just wondering, has Obama made up his mind on Israel. Will he likely step up against Israel if they start doing seriously stupid shit like a massive attack on Iran or something like that?
Hitokage said:I chuckled upon reading these words, not sure why...
Steve Youngblood said:Maybe. But I honestly don't think she's going to be anywhere near as popular if and when McCain gets destroyed on November 4th.
MobiusPigeon said:OMG Palin is on Rush Limbaugh! :lol i thought it was one of his cooks calling in at first. are they purposely trying destroy any chances they have left?
speculawyer said:Huh? McCain won his primary long before Palin was on the scene.
Or are you talking about the GOP governor's primary? She won that by merely not being corrupt (which is a pretty low bar).
Crushing the opposition, seeing their surrogates flee before you, and hearing the lamentations of the talk radio hosts ...doesn't necessitate ruthlessness.Tamanon said:He really does run a pretty ruthless campaign, but it's ruthless like Rachel Maddow, smiling cheerfully and laughing as he sticks the knife in your candidacy.
Delusional is the right word...I just had a thought concerning the McCain supports. Imagine if you've gotten all your news from Fox and Fox alone. Not only would you be convinced that Obama is the devil incarnate and has terrorist ties, but that you are truly on the path of righteousness. Ultimately it is the fault of their viewing public to not get themselves educated on the issues, but I must admit, as I write this, I feel a bit of pity for them.Fragamemnon said:This was the most absurd line out of McCain in weeks. When your opponent has multiple paths to 270 and you have, well, pretty much none, that's not 'right where you want them'.
It's delusional and everyone knew it.
Tamanon said:He really does run a pretty ruthless campaign, but it's ruthless like Rachel Maddow, smiling cheerfully and laughing as he sticks the knife in your candidacy.
Hellcrow said:Hey guys!
Just wondering, has Obama made up his mind on Israel. Will he likely step up against Israel if they start doing seriously stupid shit like a massive attack on Iran or something like that?
The difference then is Kerry wasn't ahead when it happened, he was already behind. No candidate has ever come from this far behind this close to the election in US history.Father_Brain said:What scares me is that McCain still has a double-digit lead on terrorism. I worry that if OBL tries anything, the voters will respond as they did to his tape in fall 2004.
McCain will definitely get the blame, but part of that blame is going to be the fact that he picked an incompetent running mate. I've said it before and I'll say it again - you betcha that the Palin pick is going to be looked at as one of the biggest jokes in modern presidential campaign history.Fragamemnon said:I doubt this. McCain and his staffers are going to get the blame for their defeat. Palin has already been stumping for 2012 with the base, and delievering the message they want to hear even if it isn't necessarily the message the McCain camapign wants to send out.
Because we have a defense treaty with Israel, we don't have one with Georgia, IIRC.Tideas said:if we dont step up to protect Georgia, what makes you think we'd protect Israel?
Tideas said:if we dont step up to protect Georgia, what makes you think we'd protect Israel?
lawblob said:So how does Mittens rehabilitate his image for a 2012 run? What does he do to keep himself busy the next four years?
Because we have a defense treaty with Israel, we don't have one with Georgia, IIRC.
Trurl said:If Palin gets nominated in 2012 the Republican party is done for. Not in some cyclical sense either, just done.
Brooks wasn't being hyperbolic when he said she represents a cancer on the Republican party.
lawblob said:So how does Mittens rehabilitate his image for a 2012 run? What does he do to keep himself busy the next four years?
Now that I think about it though, even you bought into it at the time.Fragamemnon said:It's brutal rope-a-dope (ask Bill Clinton about it, he got ROLLED by their team) mixed with a media strategy that makes it nearly impossible to get anything to stick to him. Which means you have to keep trying something new, which in turn makes your campaign look like it is flailing.
Oh, and then you get brutally outspent while at the same time getting your ass handed to you by the Obama ground game "field goal" unit.
And all the while you have to watch Obama's big crowds and huge smile. Is there any wonder why John McCain is so pissed off?
GhaleonEB said:The difference then is Kerry wasn't ahead when it happened, he was already behind. No candidate has ever come from this far behind this close to the election in US history.
saelz8 said:
He needs to build an image of an actual fiscal conservative. That's really why so many Republicans are disenfranchised today. A real-deal fiscal conservative would energize them like never before.lawblob said:So how does Mittens rehabilitate his image for a 2012 run? What does he do to keep himself busy the next four years?
ToxicAdam said:Let's not forget that even Quayle was a presumed front-runner going into 1996. He had the blessings of the arch-conservatives (which is one of the reasons why Bush Sr picked him in the first place.) That was all quickly undone as other, more viable candidates came to available.