alr1ghtstart said:where is that map with all of the poll closing times?
alr1ghtstart said:where is that map with all of the poll closing times?
Dean Barkley is the Ind. candidate in the Minnesota Senate raceStoney Mason said:Coleman Franken and the third party candidate (forgot his name) should be a very tight race.
Dax01 said:I understand how important voting is. Besides, 2010 is when I finally graduate. It's going to be an important year for me either way.:lol
Azwethinkweiz said:Man I just spent 4 hours in line to vote for Obama in a state where my vote doesn't even matter.
Oh, +1 Obama in SC
McCain will also win because Obamas attempt to cast him as the incumbent has failed. While McCain did a decent job of separating himself rhetorically from Bush, the undeniable blast away from the Dead Old Party was secured with the daring and brilliant choice of Sarah Palin as VP.
Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot have more integrity and genuine leadership qualities than Obama, a false demagogue to the many muddled, deeply needy minds.
McCain is wise, kind, tested, and ready. Palin is even better.
Dems are a toxic poison to freedom, prosperity, all we hold dear.
BakedPigeon said:Utah. Thank you good sir.
Wait until the polls start closing, it's going to go nuts!Nolan. said:I keep trying to keep up with this thread but it just keeps growing!.
Good . . . I hear it is a close race there. :lolwartime1020 said:+3 for obama in... DC.
just about every state in the country states that people have to be allowed 2 hours leave from work, without punishment, in order to vote on election day. Alabama even mandates that if the person is a full time employee that they get paid for that 2 hours, as well.speculawyer said:I think Rachel Maddow has it right when she declared these multi-hour long waits as "the new poll tax".
Word. I thought maybe there would be widespread reports of touch screen failure or some other nonsense. Good to hear it's fairly quiet so far.Shard said:Everything is smooth sailing thus far, of course, the event hasn't really started yet.
Dood, I totally knew black militants would throw this election. NObama!Steve Youngblood said:Black Panthers stole the election from McCain in PA. That's about it.
Gary Whitta said:Wait until the polls start closing, it's going to go nuts!
speculawyer said:I think Rachel Maddow has it right when she declared these multi-hour long waits as "the new poll tax".
besada said:Isn't Utah pretty much a blowout for McCain anyway?
Yep.lawblob said:Graduate from high school?
kkaabboomm said:alright PoliGAF, make us proud.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27487258/
it's a 50 question quiz about the entire 2008 campaign, primaries and all. i got a 98%, missing only the name of huckabee's band name.
don't cheat, and post your scores.
Fox News and other conservatives are pushing hard on the story that two black panthers may be intimidating voters at a polling place in north Philadelphia.
But an Obama campaign volunteer who's been on the scene since 6:30 AM this morning tells me in a phone interview that there's been absolutely no intimidation of voters at all today. And a Pennsylvania spokesperson for Obama said the two men aren't in any way affiliated with the campaign.
Fox News' story is right here. It says one of two black panthers on the scene was "allegedly blocking the door," says another was "holding a nightstick." and adds that "the concern was that they were intimidating people who were trying to go inside to vote."
But Jacqueline Dischell, the Obama volunteer, tells me by phone that that's false.
Dischell confirms that there were in fact two black panthers guarding the polling place, a nursing home on Fairmont Avenue in north Philadelphia, earlier this morning.
But she says one was an officially designated poll watcher (it was not immediately clear which municipal office had designated him in that role), and the second was his friend. The second panther, who left two or three hours ago, was the one with the nightstick, she says.
Dischell says that earlier this morning a few men who identified themselves as being from the McCain campaign came and started taking pictures of the two panthers on their cell phones. She suggested that they seemed to be baiting the panthers, and that the designated watcher may have given one of them the finger in response to the picture taking.
The police came roughly an hour and a half later. She says she talked to the cops and told them there had been no incident. The police drove away without getting out of the car, she adds.
Some time later, a second, larger group of men whose affiliation couldn't be determined came with real cameras and started taking more pictures. Maybe 15 minutes later the cops returned. This time, they spoke to people on both sides, and told the panther not designated to watch the polls to leave, which he did without an argument.
"There was no fight, nothing," she says.
Fox News arrived on the scene at around that time and started interviewing people near the entrance. The building manager asked the Fox reporter to leave, she says, and he moved further from the entrance.
That's where things now stand. "There has been no fighting, no voter intimidation at all," she said
Gary Whitta said:Wait until the polls start closing, it's going to go nuts!
Black Panthers? Are you shitting me? All the months of set-up and vacuous bullshit about ACORN, and they go with Black Panthers?Steve Youngblood said:Black Panthers stole the election from McCain in PA. That's about it.
Beaulieu said:how is that legal ?
Ive never waited more than 5 minutes to vote in Canada
How is it illegal?Beaulieu said:how is that legal ?
Ive never waited more than 5 minutes to vote in Canada
besada said:http://elections.utah.gov/provisionalexplained.html
The upshot is that your friends don't get to vote. Utah has a Presidential Preference thing, but it's only for the primaries, and the Provisional Ballot is the same as everyone else's.
I mean, they could physically go vote, but it's not going to get counted.
Isn't Utah pretty much a blowout for McCain anyway?
StoOgE said:So, does anyone have a good list of Congressional races to watch? Like Swing races, etc?
I'm putting together some race tracker posters for my watch party tonight.
I've got president and senate done, but want something for key congressional races. I know about Tinklewhatever the fuck vs. Bachman and the Orange to Blue candidates from kos. But what other ones?
Tamanon said:SKEERY!
Diablos said:*facepalm.gif in mind so huge it cannot be found on google*
this network is a cancer to political discourse
ShockingAlberto said:Dear John McCain,
You may be wondering what happened. Was it the economy? Was it Palin? Massive African American turnout? The Republican brand? Bush?
No, it was none of that.
Joe Lieberman is just the kiss of death.
You really should have known that.
I think the primary legal difference, if there is one (and if there isn't, there should be), would be that this message more or less claims ("misleadingly implies," if you would prefer that term) that it might be possible to vote on November 5th and impossible on November 4th (again, by implication). It is impossible that a voter could both accept that information and have his or her vote counted, unless he or she is not a Democrat. Campaign ads can go crazy negative, but I'm pretty sure none of them actually attack the viewers' right to vote or present false information that would have the same effect. Again, this might not be a law, but it should be.Count Dookkake said:Well, yeah, we could probalby talk about this all day.I don't think anyone other than a couple of knee-jerk jerk-offs were "arguing"
I agree that the intent is to mislead (even in my earlier posts I acknowledged the text was "dirty"), but was not sure how the wording was different (ie more illegal) than a misleading campaign ad with the intent of stopping votes for a particular candidate. Even if it turns out that this particular text is 100% illegal, a smart (and corrupt) enough person should be able to dance around such laws easily.
I am eager to see if this specific text gets the sender in trouble and then what happens in court.
BakedPigeon said:I have a few friends who never registered to vote. Can someone tell me if the know anything about the provisional ballot / presidential preference ballot. I heard if your not registered you can still legally vote for presidency just not county and state elections. Does anyone have any knowledge of what I am talking about? Thanks.
Azwethinkweiz said:What are they going to do? They didn't have enough machines for the turnout. I don't think they expected a turnout like this. Some guy in line behind me said he's been voting in that county for decades and never had to wait more than 5 minutes to vote. He was pretty excited by the fact that the turnout was so high, despite having to wait as long as he did.
Where do you live? (re: props)pizzaguysrevenge said:Fuck my polling place. They didn't have me on the list so I had to fill out a bullshit porvisional ballot that probably won't even be counted. At least there was no line whatsoever.
I said fuck it and voted Obama.
Yes on 1A
No on 2
Yes on 3
Yes on 4
Yes on 5
No on 6
No on 7
No on 8
No on 9
No on 10
Yes on 11
No on 12
Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE to report any polling place hijinx.pizzaguysrevenge said:Fuck my polling place. They didn't have me on the list so I had to fill out a bullshit porvisional ballot that probably won't even be counted. At least there was no line whatsoever.
I said fuck it and voted Obama.
Yes on 1A
No on 2
Yes on 3
Yes on 4
Yes on 5
No on 6
No on 7
No on 8
No on 9
No on 10
Yes on 11
No on 12
Gary Whitta said:Garrison Keillor on the election:
Obama vs Palin!nbcjr said:palin will be a candidate in 2012
:lol Same.Shard said:I for one have hated Liberman ever since he went after our video games, Mortal Kombat now, Mortal Kombat forever.
Slurpy said:It's fucking moronic not to have expected a massive turnout today. It was clear months ago that this was going to be the case. They had a shitload of time to prepare for this.
Quixzlizx said:"Why McCain Will Win"
http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/11/03/tbruce_11103/
Comments Bonus (http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/11/03/tbruce_11103/#comment-444638):
:lol :lol :lol :lol
So there you have my November 3rd take.
And if Im right and the vote is close in 2008, when the Democratic Party has every political reason to wipe out the Republicans, it will mean our country rejects major elements of Senator Obamas plan to revolutionize important American values, beginning with the right to life. Then the Democratic Party may see the benefit of freeing itself from the stranglehold of the culture of death, forced upon it by extreme, and extremely powerful, interest groups. What a relief it would be for Values Voters to have a viable alternative to the very imperfect Republican Party.
And what is your November 3rd prediction?
God bless,
Father Jonathan