• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF Interim Thread of cunning stunts and desperate punts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Keylime

Keylime

ÏÎ¯Î»Ï á¼Î¾ÎµÏÎγλοÏÏον καί ÏεÏδολÏγον οá½Îº εἰÏÏν
Tamanon said:
McCain would probably be a better dinner because you could beat rush hour home.
Click to expand...
And if you're paying, you'll get a senior discount!
 
V

ViperVisor

Member
minus_273 said:
wow. he must have realized how saying that about palin would be taken.
Click to expand...

If people bring this bullshit up it is a perfect time to bring up McCain on Chelsea

Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno.
 
T

TreIII

Member
lawblob said:
But Obama wouldn't address you as "my friend" 30 times over the course of the evening.
Click to expand...

Exactly.

After dinner was over, Obama would probably be the guy that would just give you some dap (oh, excuse me "TERRORIST JAB!"), and that would be more than enough to show you that he's sincere. :lol
 
J

Jason's Ultimatum

Member
You know if McCain does win, I hope that article about McCain having Democrats in his cabinet comes to fruitation. I'd be a little more comfortable with his administration then.
 
T

Tamanon

Banned
"My friend, would you pass the sugar?"
"My friend, did I ever tell you how long I went without eating at a table?"
"Dammit, McCain, we're acquaintances, not friends!"

Jason: Remember, he still thinks Lieberman is a Democrat:p
 
Chiggs

Chiggs

Gold Member
Tamanon said:
Chiggs: Do you have any evidence whatsoever about that? I mean, the VA is really good at identifying who should receive benefits and who is classified as a "veteran".
Click to expand...

I knew that wouldn't come across very good, but my concern is the number of genuine homeless veterans versus people that may have been in the military and went A.W.O.L. or were thrown out. And I'm not speaking about the VA, either....more or less touching on the organizations that throw out some of these numbers based on highly suspect methods.

VA says 154,000...maybe even twice that on a given night...nothing decisive.

http://www1.va.gov/homeless/page.cfm?pg=1

And then you have some claims that it's 500k plus. What is the actual number and why aren't they getting help? Furthermore, what led to their homelessness?
 
G

grandjedi6

Master of the Google Search
TDG said:
I didn't recieve any credit for my three posts about the fake poll/real poll, which I though were hilariously ironic and well-crafted, and I'm a bit disappointed.

In response to the fake poll:



In response to the real poll:
Click to expand...

Your parody was too accurate and thus was drowned out in the crowd
 
Chiggs

Chiggs

Gold Member
sevenchaos said:
They pussied out. So fuck 'em.
Click to expand...

Geez....

Captain Pants said:
You are right. I think we should ignore them since they are obviously all liars. Shit, they probably aren't even homeless.
/sarcasm
Click to expand...

Come on, that's not what I'm even saying.
 
G

grandjedi6

Master of the Google Search
Jason's Ultimatum said:
You know if McCain does win, I hope that article about McCain having Democrats in his cabinet comes to fruitation. I'd be a little more comfortable with his administration then.
Click to expand...
Even Bush had a democrat in his cabinet. In these modern day presidencies, NOT having a member of the opposite party in your cabinet is odd.
 
S

Stoney Mason

Banned
Jason's Ultimatum said:
You know if McCain does win, I hope that article about McCain having Democrats in his cabinet comes to fruitation. I'd be a little more comfortable with his administration then.
Click to expand...

He would put right leaning democrats in positions where they can lean right. Like Lieberman. Its purely for show.
 
A

adamsappel

Member
Dr_Cogent said:
For an older woman, she's not bad looking still. I still stand by my statement that you are insane. Manly jaw lines? Give me a break.

If she were a democrat, you would be singing a different tune altogether I am sure. Since she is an evil Republican, she's a monster.

Yep. And for an older woman, she's not bad looking still.
Click to expand...
I must break from my librul brethren here and agree that Sarah Palin is sexy as hell. Her voice could use a little modulation, but I suppose if it were shrilling out dirty words and requests I wouldn't mind it as much. You naysayers are going to be mighty disappointed one day when you see what the typical eye candy is at the PTA.
 
B

Barrett2

Member
adamsappel said:
I must break from my librul brethren here and agree that Sarah Palin is sexy as hell. Her voice could use a little modulation, but I suppose if it were shrilling out dirty words and requests I wouldn't mind it as much. You naysayers are going to be mighty disappointed one day when you see what the typical eye candy is at the PTA.
Click to expand...

Yeah, Palin is hot. She has a smoking body for a woman with 5 kids
 
C

Cooter

Lacks the power of instantaneous movement
Stop being a drudge parrot.

Did Palin call herself a dog (bitch even) then?
Click to expand...

Am I wrong? I'm just putting my political analyst hat on and that's how I see it.
 
T

Thunder Monkey

Banned
adamsappel said:
I must break from my librul brethren here and agree that Sarah Palin is sexy as hell. Her voice could use a little modulation, but I suppose if it were shrilling out dirty words and requests I wouldn't mind it as much. You naysayers are going to be mighty disappointed one day when you see what the typical eye candy is at the PTA.
Click to expand...
She's definitely a hottie.

I'm still wondering if she's stupid and getting in way over her head, or if she's evil. Her history lends credence to the latter.

But she's definitely hot.
 
M

minus_273

Banned
gkrykewy said:
Stop being a drudge parrot.

Did Palin call herself a dog (bitch even) then?
Click to expand...

now that its the big link in bold on the front page of drudge. lets sit back and watch how everyone else understands it. The crowd understood he was talking about palin. from politico

"Amie Parnes reports from Lebanon, VA:

Obama poked fun of McCain and Palin's new "change" mantra.

"You can put lipstick on a pig," he said as the crowd cheered. "It's still a pig."

"You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It's still gonna stink."

"We've had enough of the same old thing."

The crowd apparently took the "lipstick" line as a reference to Palin, who described the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull in a single word: "lipstick.""
 
P

PhoenixDark

Banned
Cooter said:
Am I wrong?
Click to expand...

3hwrc7
 
N

NullPointer

Member
The Lamonster said:
wtf I guess you guys have never heard that saying before. It will not hurt him.
Click to expand...

Seriously, its a common phrase.

If that's the kind of thing that gets people upset we have truly lost all sense of balance.

Edit: And yes, he was using it in reference to Palin's remarks I'm sure. So what?
 
G

gkryhewy

Member
I see it as a nonissue. So much else being talked about, and again, it is a very common expression. We shall see.

Should there be backlash, he can just bring it back to the current narrative on pork barrel spending :lol :lol :D
 
Xisiqomelir

Xisiqomelir

Member
The Lamonster said:
wtf I guess you guys have never heard that saying before. It will not hurt him.
Click to expand...

Careless use of "Niggardly" in front of the uneducated has hurt a bunch of people, and it doesn't even have a Romance etymology!
 
G

Gaborn

Member
ronito said:
I'd love to have dinner with Palin but I'm pretty sure she'd keep asking her family who let the gardener in.
Click to expand...

Alaskans have gardens? (ok, obviously they have grass and such, particularly during the half a year of light, but still...)
 
R

ronito

Member
Gaborn said:
Alaskans have gardens? (ok, obviously they have grass and such, particularly during the half a year of light, but still...)
Click to expand...
well how else would Palin explain a vato in her house?
 
J

Jason's Ultimatum

Member
tanod said:
Where was Kerry in this poll four years ago?
Click to expand...


While polls can't accurately gauge an election five months out -- after all, so much can still happen -- Bush never trailed Kerry in the 2004 NBC/WSJ polls that measured registered voters' preference for Bush, Kerry, and Nader. And Bush's lead was never bigger than four points.

Bush won that presidential election by three percentage points, 51%-48%.

Here were the NBC/WSJ trial heats from March 2004 (when Kerry pretty much locked up the nomination) to late October 2004:

March (Mar.6-8): Bush 46%, Kerry 43%, Nader 5%
May (May 1-3): Bush 46%, Kerry 42%, Nader 5%
June (June 25-28): Bush 45%, Kerry 44%, Nader 4%
July (July 19-21): Bush 47%, Kerry 45%, Nader 2%
August (Aug.23-25): Bush 47%, Kerry 45%, Nader 3%
September (Sept.17-19): Bush 48%, Kerry 45%, Nader 2%
Mid October (Oct.16-18): Bush 48%, Kerry 46%, Nader 2%
Late October (Oct.29-31): Bush 48%, Kerry 47%, Nader 1%
Click to expand...

The only national poll I follow is NBC/WSJ.
 
T

TDG

Banned
The Lamonster said:
wtf I guess you guys have never heard that saying before. It will not hurt him.
Click to expand...
Considering the prior comments about Palin and lipstick, I'm sure many people will interpret it as calling Palin a pig, and they wouldn't be stupid for doing so.
 
G

gkryhewy

Member
TDG said:
Considering the prior comments about Palin and lipstick, I'm sure many people will interpret it as calling Palin a pig, and they wouldn't be stupid for doing so.
Click to expand...

I'm telling you, it's a rope-a-hope for the pork barrel spending narrative! Always thinking, those guys.
 
P

polyh3dron

Banned
Dr_Cogent said:
For an older woman, she's not bad looking still. I still stand by my statement that you are insane. Manly jaw lines? Give me a break.

If she were a democrat, you would be singing a different tune altogether I am sure. Since she is an evil Republican, she's a monster.
Click to expand...
She's a monster because everything coming out of her mouth is either a lie or an intellectually dishonest talking point, and even after her talking points have been refuted she still spews them knowing full well that they've been proven wrong, yet she doesn't care because she feels that her base is too stupid to catch on to her lies even when they're being told flat out that they are lies. How do you justify this?

I love it when Republicans have to make excuses for all of the lying and corruption in their party.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

  • Locked
RNC suspending GOP Feb '16 debate with NBC (Because lol CNBC)
2 3 4 5
212
19K
OuterLimits replied
  • Locked
The Democratic National Committee Chair Debate |OT| - Dem One: A Politics Story
2
79
8K
kirblar replied
  • Locked
NYT: G.O.P. Urges Donald Trump to Broaden Outreach to Black Voters
2 3 4
178
21K
mckmas8808 replied
  • Locked
Hillary Clinton retweets Slate voter guide calling her most corrupt candidate
3
4K
ModBot replied
  • Locked
NYT: "Trump-Size Idea for a New President: Build Something Inspiring"
2
74
9K
jerry113 replied
Top Bottom