Diablos said:If it happened in 2004, it can happen again. Wow. That's awful.
Until 2008, the Republican ground game was miles ahead of the Democratic ground game. MILES
Diablos said:If it happened in 2004, it can happen again. Wow. That's awful.
Diablos said:Has anyone read the Rolling Stone article?
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen
This article is HUGE. I'm not posting all of it... feel free to put emphasis on what you find to be most interesting. This part is pretty amazing (depressing):
If it happened in 2004, it can happen again. Wow. That's awful.
Some things are being done to prevent it. New governor and secretary of state in Ohio have made some major changes and should help mitigate shenanigans.quadriplegicjon said:
Killthee said:
Read it again.TheGrayGhost said:So let me see if I understand this data correctly...
Obama will only increase your taxes if you earn more than 603,402?
TheGrayGhost said:So let me see if I understand this data correctly...
Obama will only increase your taxes if you earn more than 603,402?
All he has to do is look the other way. It's clear that it was basically set up that way for Bush last time.GhaleonEB said:Some things are being done to prevent it. New governor and secretary of state in Ohio have made some major changes and should help mitigate shenanigans.
I have to be hopeful, since it's just too depressing to think McCain could steal it like that.
Obama has two key advantages over McCain when it comes to beating the polling numbers.StoOgE said:Drek, while I generally agree that the pollsters who are basing their demographics off of 2000 and 2004 numbers are completely wrong, I dont think it is going to give Obama all of those states. My guess is Obama is going to outperform the national polls by about +3-5 from what we are seeing polled. The fact that some of these polls are assuming black turnout *below* 2004 levels makes me laugh.
That said, not all states are going to be effected the same way. Some of the swing states have smaller black and youth populations. So you cant say he is +3 in all states. I also think Georgia, North Carolina and Missouri are out of play at this point.
That said, no matter what Pollster says, NH, NM, IA and MI are all going Obama.
Its going to come down to can he win CO, VA, OH, FL or NV. Basically the map is still in Obamas favor, much like Kerry in 2004, McCain has to run the table.
Diablos said:Has anyone read the Rolling Stone article?
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen
This article is HUGE. I'm not posting all of it... feel free to put emphasis on what you find to be most interesting. This part is pretty amazing (depressing):
If it happened in 2004, it can happen again. Wow. That's awful.
TheGrayGhost said:So let me see if I understand this data correctly...
Obama will only increase your taxes if you earn more than 603,402?
DAMMITDiablos said:All he has to do is look the other way. It's clear that it was basically set up that way for Bush last time.
Look at what we're learning about people in Michigan getting fucked over. It's already starting to happen in some places.
Yeah.PrivateWHudson said:Why bother with real polls. Let's just use exit polls to determine the next President. None of us would have to stay up late. Probably wouldn't even have to bother going to vote after we get off work at 6pm. It should all be wrapped up by dinnertime.
AndyIsTheMoney said:so if you earn 2.8 million, between McCain and Obama there is a difference of taxes you will pay equaling a million dollars. wow
So let me see if I understand this data correctly...
Obama will only increase your taxes if you earn more than 603,402?
so if you earn 2.8 million, between McCain and Obama there is a difference of taxes you will pay equaling a million dollars. wow
Instigator said:And destroy America in the process.
This is socialism.
Instigator said:And destroy America in the process.
This is socialism.
speculawyer said:Wow . . . I didn't realize that from the 1920s to the 2000 the USA was a socialist country!
Seriously now . . . go for hyperbole!
You conservatives are supposed to love the old days . . . now you hate them?
speculawyer said:Wow . . . I didn't realize that from the 1920s to the 2000 the USA was a socialist country!
Seriously now . . . go for hyperbole!
You conservatives are supposed to love the old days . . . now you hate them?
AndyIsTheMoney said:the country is headed this way, its a slow process but will only be a matter of time. As we increase taxes on the corporations and investors, along with globalization, be prepared to see further business development in China, India, etc. There becomes a point when it is much more economically feasible to do so.
Sarah Palin said:I told Congress thanks but no thanks to that Bridge to Nowhere YEAAHHH
Instigatorspeculawyer said:Wow . . . I didn't realize that from the 1920s to the 2000 the USA was a socialist country!
Seriously now . . . go for hyperbole!
You conservatives are supposed to love the old days . . . now you hate them?
AndyIsTheMoney said:the country is headed this way, its a slow process but will only be a matter of time. As we increase taxes on the corporations and investors, along with globalization, be prepared to see further business development in China, India, etc. There becomes a point when it is much more economically feasible to do so.
The funny part was where Andyisthemoney took it seriously.Stoney Mason said:Check the poster. Satire.
Yaweee said:Why are people comparing the candidates' tax policies? There's not a chance in hell either of them are going to pass as is, especially considering how terminally fucked the federal budget is.
Yaweee said:
speculawyer said:Wow . . . I didn't realize that from the 1920s to the 2000 the USA was a socialist country!
Seriously now . . . go for hyperbole!
You conservatives are supposed to love the old days . . . now you hate them?
Cloudy said:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/13/AR2008091302270.html
Guys behind the Swiftboat garbage are coming out with ads against Obama..
It's not like she went to school with more than 20 people though. They can't run the gov.AniHawk said:She is the scariest thing about a McCain/Palin presidency. She'd probably have everyone that voted against her sent to the guillotine if it wasn't for the pesky Bill of Rights.
speculawyer said:You young children have no idea what you are talking about.
Serious now . . . was Ike a communist? That is what you are saying.
AniHawk said:Also, the Republican 527 ads... ugh. It's gonna be Jeremiah Wright 24/7 and other shit that calls attention to Obama's race.
Gaborn said:What does Jeremiah Wright have to do with Obama's race? A white person can have a black pastor too you know.
:lolSon of Godzilla said:It's not like she went to school with more than 20 people though. They can't run the gov.
WickedAngel said:Guilt by association. Having a radical African American pastor makes you a radical (Or some such nonsense).
Gaborn said:I'm not buying it, again, the beliefs of your pastor do nothing to call attention to your skin color.
Gaborn said:I'm not buying it, again, the beliefs of your pastor do nothing to call attention to your skin color.
AniHawk said:The whole point is to subconsciously call upon deep-rooted fears that many whites have, and to make Obama out to have the same attitude Wright does.