Hellsing321
Member
The most powerful media in existence. The "librul" blogosphere!Tamanon said:What media floated around the pregnancy faking?
The most powerful media in existence. The "librul" blogosphere!Tamanon said:What media floated around the pregnancy faking?
Byakuya769 said:absolutely, but gonna need some of those votes to win or not show up on election day. If they continue to think that big bad "libruhl" media is out to get lady sarah and sir mccain
The more the merrier, though!Fragamemnon said:He just needs a little bit more moderates and usual Democrats, given expected overall turnout percentages and current grassroots mobilization. Obama doesn't need the kind of significant 'Obamacan' support from Republicans (or self-professed conservatives) that McCain needs from registered Democrats.
Some republican shill going on air and saying that the media is obsessed with Bristol's Baby a day after they fucking announce Bristol has a baby does not equate with the media being obsessed with Bristol's Baby.avatar299 said:To be fair, this is the same media that latched onto bristol like a leech, and floated around the idea that Sarah Palin faked her pregnancy. Not really bastions of quality from any angle reporting from any angle.
Even alcoholics anonymous gets it!GhaleonEB said:One more note on the SUSA VA poll: it has Obama getting 88% of the AA vote - the same that Kerry got.
There's more than one? Bloggers floated it and News Network focused on the bristols pregnancy. Both were embarrassing.Steve Youngblood said:Which media was guilty of this?
artredis1980 said:ABC Breaking News: Fired Official says Palin lied in ABC interview
more here: http://www.abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5804703&page=1
The Blue Jihad said:12345AniHawk said:12345? That's the same combination I have on my luggage!
three times a charm!polyh3dron said:
Its salesmanship not leadership for Barack Obama and his running mate to tell families in Michigan that they have plans to aid the middle class when they recently both voted in favor of higher taxes, said McCain spokesman Ben Porritt.
isn't that a bad sign?GhaleonEB said:One more note on the SUSA VA poll: it has Obama getting 88% of the AA vote - the same that Kerry got.
It's means that in addition to undersampling the proportion ofThe Lamonster said:isn't that a bad sign?
and lol @ the Alcoholics Anonymous joke
And the other 4-5 days of coverage come from where?Son of Godzilla said:Some republican shill going on air and saying that the media is obsessed with Bristol's Baby a day after they fucking announce Bristol has a baby does not equate with the media being obsessed with Bristol's Baby.
I was wanting a definition of 'media'. As for your reference of bloggers, we're just going to disregard that, as it's ridiculous to pretend that the average Joe is getting their news from a site that was running with hearsay and speculation about Trig actually being Bristol's kid.avatar299 said:There's more than one? Bloggers floated it and News Network focused on the bristols pregnancy. Both were embarrassing.
I'm still not convinced that a significant number of black and youth new voters will actually turn out in November, although they did for the primaries...GhaleonEB said:It's means that in addition to undersampling the proportion ofAAblack voters, they are also under-representing the level of support Obama will probably get from them.
Indeed...gcubed said:PD... like it or not, a decent portion of the US gets their views/ideas directly from the media.
chillthefuckoutigotthis.jpgBarack Obama said:Simple math tells the tale. In the thirty-nine town hall meetings I held during my first year in office, turnout at each meeting averaged four to five hundred people, which means that I was able to meet with maybe fifteen to twenty thousand people. Should I sustain this pace for the remainder of my term, I will have had direct, personal contact with maybe ninety-five to one hundred thousand of my constituents by the time Election Day rolls around.
In contrast, a three-minute story on the lowest-rated local news broadcast in the Chicago media market may reach two hundred thousand people. In other words, I--like every politician at the federal level--am almost entirely dependent on the media to reach my constituents. It is the filter through which my votes are interpreted, my statements analyzed, my beliefs examined. For the broad public at least, I am who the media says I am. I say what they say I say. I become who they say I've become.
The Lamonster said:On another note, 9 hours of phone banking for the Obama campaign over the weekend; just signed up for at least two more hours tonight! I strongly encourage all Obama supporters to at least put in a couple hours a week at your local office. We really need more volunteers.
Man that is a massive pile of bullshit. That conspiracy theory only floated around on some blogs and even there it was just a conspiracy theory. The mainstream media said NOTHING about that. I had not even heard of that theory until the McCain campaign came out saying Bristol was pregnant to dispell such a conspiracy theory.avatar299 said:To be fair, this is the same media that latched onto bristol like a leech, and floated around the idea that Sarah Palin faked her pregnancy. Not really bastions of quality from any angle reporting from any angle.
capslock said:This has to be the greatest ownage I have seen in Senate Hearing history, from a recent bi-partisan Energy Summit. I think Obama needs to make this into an ad or get this dude to be his surrogate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnJAIeEgjSM&eurl=http://www.dailykos.com/
CharlieDigital said:DO IT FOR THE LULZ!
avatar299 said:And the other 4-5 days of coverage come from where?
A lot of people thought the coverage was stupid and overextended, especially when it started to involve her social views on abstinence.
avatar299 said:And the other 4-5 days of coverage come from where?
WTF? You don't think that when the 17 year old daughter of a national candidate is pregnant, the abstinence-only POLICY views of that candidate are worthy of discussion? WTF?A lot of people thought the coverage was stupid and overextended, especially when it started to involve her social views on abstinence.
As a site whose members broke into her email acount? Are you fucking retarded?quadriplegicjon said:i would looove to see neogaf mentioned on CNN with regard to this election! would be amazing.
How is that ridiculous. There are blogs for every political insight. There are blogs on cnn, msnbcs commentators have blogs, and blogs like the national review or the huffington post are enormous. To the point that moderators are now considered "experts" by some news station. Blogs are part of America's media. Deal with itSteve Youngblood said:I was wanting a definition of 'media'. As for your reference of bloggers, we're just going to disregard that, as it's ridiculous to pretend that the average Joe is getting their news from a site that was running with hearsay and speculation about Trig actually being Bristol's kid.
Now the Enquirer isn't part of the media?:lolSteve Youngblood said:As for Bristol's actual pregnancey, wasn't the Enquirier the one who was going to break the story?
What station didn't run with it for close to half a week? C-SPAN?Steve Youngblood said:What mainstream media was covering this in a way that deserved the outrage given by the GOP? The way they act, I would swear that I should be able to turn on the TV right now and see hour 200 of the nonstop Palin-gate coverage where they're interviewing her old college roommate about how Palin never chipped in for groceries.
Not if there are vastly more AAs voting this year than 4 years ago (all signs point to yes).The Lamonster said:isn't that a bad sign?
and lol @ the Alcoholics Anonymous joke
polyh3dron said:McCain was unaware of kids having to pay $40 to participate in Florida school sports.
He then goes on to say how great No Child Left Behind has been in improving education.
capslock said:This has to be the greatest ownage I have seen in Senate Hearing history, from a recent bi-partisan Energy Summit. I think Obama needs to make this into an ad or get this dude to be his surrogate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnJAIeEgjSM&eurl=http://www.dailykos.com/
quadriplegicjon said::lol thats a huge gaffe for floridians.. No Child Left Behind is hated my most everyone here.
capslock said:This has to be the greatest ownage I have seen in Senate Hearing history, from a recent bi-partisan Energy Summit. I think Obama needs to make this into an ad or get this dude to be his surrogate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnJAIeEgjSM&eurl=http://www.dailykos.com/
Let's rephrase. Media with an influence. Sure, there are blogs that people go to dilligently, and choose to be informed by them. However, these do not include the types of blogs that were running with Palin scandals of such an inconsequential nature. So, when I say media, I mean what respected, widely-circulated media was running with these rumors? The Enquirer doesn't count, and Daily Kos doesn't count.avatar299 said:How is that ridiculous. There are blogs for every political insight. There are blogs on cnn, msnbcs commentators have blogs, and blogs like the national review or the huffington post are enormous. To the point that moderators are now considered "experts" by some news station. Blogs are part of America's media. Deal with it
Now the Enquirer isn't part of the media?:lol
Your last statement goes back to the above. The "media" can encompass whatever you want. I could write trash about Palin on my MySpace page, and by loose definitions, I guess you could say I'm part of the media.What station didn't run with it for close to half a week? C-SPAN?
The "media" is not just 3 news station. You have radio stations, blogs, newspaper editorials, commentators, etc etc
avatar299 said:How is that ridiculous. There are blogs for every political insight. There are blogs on cnn, msnbcs commentators have blogs, and blogs like the national review or the huffington post are enormous. To the point that moderators are now considered "experts" by some news station. Blogs are part of America's media. Deal with it
CharlieDigital said:I've been thinking about doing this.
Can you describe your experiences? How do people take to being called about the campaign? How do you go about engaging them?
It is when we don't know the details of that situation. The assumption that the daughter follows the mother lock step in every social view is pretty stupid, and kinda misses the point of abstinence.speculawyer said:WTF? You don't think that when the 17 year old daughter of a national candidate is pregnant, the abstinence-only POLICY views of that candidate are worthy of discussion? WTF?
dailykos isn't some backwater website. Markos Moulitsas is a fairly rspected liberal voice and has been on MSNBC many times, and on Charlie Rose's show. Not comparable at all.speculawyer said:Back-pedal Back-pedal Back-pedal Back-pedal Back-pedal Back-pedal!
Wow . . . weak too. So if I find some blog post from some racist saying Black people should be enslaved then I can say "THE MEDIA IS SAYING WE SHOULD BRING BACK SLAVERY!"
Sure. In this phase of the campaign, we are just trying to see who is supporting who so we know who we need to call in the future. Once somebody is identified as a McCain or Obama supporter, we will not call them ever again. There simply isn't enough time. We are trying to pinpoint the "leaners" and undecideds.CharlieDigital said:I've been thinking about doing this.
Can you describe your experiences? How do people take to being called about the campaign? How do you go about engaging them?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=334590thekad said:Hitokage: When did Obama give that quote?
Hitokage said:As a site whose members broke into her email acount? Are you fucking retarded?
But, as he continually demonstrates in this campaign, my cousin John is long gone. "Straight talk" has been replaced with "flip-flop." Saddest all, this is the same man who, when campaigning in 2000, told a crowd of supporters, "I don't think Bill Gates needs a tax cut. I think your parents do."
HOLY SHIT! :Oartredis1980 said:BANG
http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:LEH-P&client=ft
LEHMAN BROS HLDGS (Public, NYSE:LEH-P) - Add to Portfolio - Discuss LEH-P Find more results for LEH-P
2.95
-316.74 (-99.08%)
avatar299 said:It is when we don't know the details of that situation. The assumption that the daughter follows the mother lock step in every social view is pretty stupid, and kinda misses the point of abstinence.
What the hell? Wachovia better be ok or this city is gonna be hurting badly.artredis1980 said:and AFTER THAT (Wachovia)
http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:WB-S&client=ft
Wachovia Corp (New) PRFD 'S' (Public, NYSE:WB-S) - Add to Portfolio - Discuss WB-S Find more results for WB-S
11.00
-3.47 (-24.00%)
It might be sad for those GOP faithful who just swallow whatever bs the republicans present them, but as long as everyone else recognises what this means for her integrity and acts accordingly (i.e. will not vote for her) things should be fine.speculawyer said:Sadly, the GOPer faithful won't care in the least. She's an evangelical and that basically means she could eat a child on live TV and her fans wouldn't mind as long as she said it was part of God's plan.
They've already accepted the lies about Wooten being a wife-beater so they'll readily accept lies about denying any pressure on Monegan to fire Wooten.
It is mind-boggling.