• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF Interim Thread of USA General Elections (DAWN OF THE VEEP)

Status
Not open for further replies.
domokunrox said:
Obama is not a big hit with my wife over some e-mail forward she got at work.

She got this

According to the United States Code, Title 36,
Chapter 10, Sec. 171,
During rendition of the national anthem when
the flag is displayed, all present except those
in uniform are expected to stand at attention
facing the flag with the right hand over the
heart.

"As I've said about the flag pin, I don't want
to be perceived as taking sides," Obama said.
"There are a lot of people in the world to whom the
American flag is a symbol of oppression. And the
anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You
know, the bombs bursting in air and all. It
should be swapped for something less
parochial and less bellicose. I like the song
'I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing.' If that
were our anthem, then I might salute
it."

Shes pretty upset about hearing this.

If I had a dollar for every dumb ass Obama e-mail forward my student loans would be paid off.
 

Door2Dawn

Banned
Gaborn said:
So he's right, you're penalizing him being richer and taking a larger PERCENTAGE of his income. That's flat out wrong. Most people could afford increasing their income tax, that doesn't mean it's acceptable to do so, he worked extremely hard for the money, and just because he works hard enough to earn more money you believe the government has a right to a bigger share of his income than someone who works at a low paying job.
Unless he makes over 2 million dollars a year,then hes just getting upset over nothing.
 
JayDubya said:
He would already pay more by virtue of paying the same percentage of taxes and earning more, that's kind of how percentages work.

Edit: B-10.

True, but I'm just saying it wouldn't hurt him by paying higher taxes as much at it would help the lower/middle class.

Door2Dawn said:
Why do I see 2 different posters with the same avatar?

Same singer, different .gifs.
 

Zaptruder

Banned
Vinzer Deling said:
Obama want to cut taxes for the poors and the middle class while increasing the tax rate for people like me because we deserved to be taxed for our success.

McCain wants to open up the fucking borders as if there wasn't enough illegals in my city.

Both of these retards support Israel.

You are already rewarded for your success by how much you make. Simply put though, someone has to pay, and you're simply more able to afford it; it's less opportunity cost for you, and 'less taxing' for you to pay more taxes.

If you disagree with the increase in taxes for the wealthy, then you can move to another country and try to find success where the taxes for the wealthy aren't as steep.

One of the most impressive bits of subversion by the wealthy, that 5-10% of the country have managed to convince 90-95% of the rest that it's in their best interest for them to pay more of their less, than it is for the wealthy to pay more of the more they have.

Of course, there's a limit to how much tax the rich can bear... but you'll find it to be suprisingly elastic, like the price of oil.
 

Stumpokapow

listen to the mad man
domokunrox said:
Obama is not a big hit with my wife over some e-mail forward she got at work.

She got this

According to the United States Code, Title 36,
Chapter 10, Sec. 171,
During rendition of the national anthem when
the flag is displayed, all present except those
in uniform are expected to stand at attention
facing the flag with the right hand over the
heart.

"As I've said about the flag pin, I don't want
to be perceived as taking sides," Obama said.
"There are a lot of people in the world to whom the
American flag is a symbol of oppression. And the
anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You
know, the bombs bursting in air and all. It
should be swapped for something less
parochial and less bellicose. I like the song
'I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing.' If that
were our anthem, then I might salute
it."

Shes pretty upset about hearing this.

John McCain actually fought for the Iraqi Army in the first Gulf War, personally overseeing the capture and torture of Americans, so I don't see why your wife would favour him over Obama, who just wants to change the national anthem.

Also, why is your wife a terrorist?
 

Amir0x

Banned
Vinzer Deling said:
And who the fuck gives anyone the right to tax my labor just because I succeeded financially?

Why bother, cap earnings at 50k. Everyone makes 50K, no matter if your job is pushing carts at walmart, or an engineer that works 14 hours a day to finish up a project.

Hee hee false sense of entitlement is the best entitlement of all
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
domokunrox said:
Obama is not a big hit with my wife over some e-mail forward she got at work.

She got this

"As I've said about the flag pin, I don't want
to be perceived as taking sides," Obama said.
"There are a lot of people in the world to whom the
American flag is a symbol of oppression. And the
anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You
know, the bombs bursting in air and all. It
should be swapped for something less
parochial and less bellicose. I like the song
'I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing.' If that
were our anthem, then I might salute
it."

Shes pretty upset about hearing this.

I have a hard time believing Obama said this.
 

Amir0x

Banned
stop quoting bullshit please, let that shit die in the inboxes of the right-wing nutjobs and passively aggressive/racist housewives.
 
Deus Ex Machina said:
Kristol: Bush might bomb Iran if he 'thinks Senator Obama’s going to win’

On Fox News Sunday this morning, Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol said that President Bush is more likely to attack Iran if he believes Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) is going to be elected.

Interview on Fox Link: http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/22/kristol-bush-iran/

This would change my opinion that Bush "might" be the anti-christ, to Bush "is" the anti-christ.
 

Zaptruder

Banned
Gaborn said:
So he's right, you're penalizing him being richer and taking a larger PERCENTAGE of his income. That's flat out wrong. Most people could afford increasing their income tax, that doesn't mean it's acceptable to do so, he worked extremely hard for the money, and just because he works hard enough to earn more money you believe the government has a right to a bigger share of his income than someone who works at a low paying job.

If you could power a nation on just hopes and dreams, I'm sure the government would be happy to cut everyone's taxes to get more hopes and dreams to power the economy.

In the mean time though, utility theory is a good way of figuring out tax rates; you should be rewarded for working harder, but at the same time, the work you put in for your hundred thousandth dollar is less critical to your needs (or even utility), then the work that someone else has put in for their ten thousandth.

Otherwise what would you suggest? Getting everyone in the future to pay off your benefits now? Well, they've tried that for the last 8 years, and the world economies have lost a lot of confidence in America as a result.
 

Gaborn

Member
mckmas8808 said:
I have a hard time believing Obama said this.

According to Politifact he didn't, someone named John Semmens did.

Zaptruder - I suggest a massive scaledown in the size of government at every level, both domestically and overseas. Pull back and get rid of the national debt, shrink government as much as possible, cut taxes and cut spending. Let people opt out of social security (as well as raise the retirement age by ten years so its more in line with FDR's original vision of getting the money to enjoy the last few years of your life).
 

Chichikov

Member
Deus Ex Machina said:
Kristol: Bush might bomb Iran if he 'thinks Senator Obama’s going to win’

On Fox News Sunday this morning, Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol said that President Bush is more likely to attack Iran if he believes Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) is going to be elected.

Interview on Fox Link: http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/22/kristol-bush-iran/
This is awesome.

You see this beautiful Persian country?
Wouldn't it be a shame of someone just happen to bomb it?
Yeah, a great shame, I would hate to see it happen.
But my friend here W is crazy, you don't want make him angry.
Why would you piss him by voting for that secret Muslim?
Think about the Iranians
 

Amir0x

Banned
Vinzer Deling said:
So I'm not entitled to the fruits of MY labor?

That's right, you're entitled to the fruits of your labor!

SHIT, wait, you're telling me the government is TAKING MONEY OUT OF YOUR CHECK EVEN NOW!?

How dare they think they can take money out of my checks, for all the hard work I've done!

Highlight the following for spiritual enlightenment:
you're absolutely entitled to the fruits of your labor. Receiving one less fruit out of your bountiful tree of endless juicy sweetness is not going to hurt your bitter soul one bit.
 

KRS7

Member
Has anyone ever heard of snopes?

That anthem quote is blatantly false and was originally posted on the site of "The Arizona Conservative."

Please email the person who sent that email a nasty worm. Label it "Barack and Michele Obama's flag stomping whitey rant at Hezbollah mosque" and they would be sure to open it.
 

Gaborn

Member
Amir0x said:
That's right, you're entitled to the fruits of your labor!

SHIT, wait, you're telling me the government is TAKING MONEY OUT OF YOUR CHECK EVEN NOW!?

How dare they think they can take money out of my checks, for all the hard work I've done!

Highlight the following for spiritual enlightenment:
you're absolutely entitled to the fruits of your labor. Receiving one less fruit out of your bountiful tree of endless juicy sweetness is not going to hurt your bitter soul one bit.

His point though is it's perfectly "fair" (maybe not right, but fair) to take the same percentage of the "Fruits of his labor" as it were as people with less, so if you have, to continue the analogy 10 apples, and the government takes one, and if you have 100 the government takes ten, that's fair. But why be forced to give the government 15? or 20? or 40? You worked hard to produce that many, you worked hard, you worked overtime, and you get penalized for doing so? That's the part that isn't right.
 
I just brought up the e-mail to inform you guys whats circulating out there.

Also, to make sure he didn't say that. I believe you guys, believe it or not. I just needed someone to confirm to me that its bullshit, because I had a hard time believing that he said that as well.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Deus Ex Machina said:
Kristol: Bush might bomb Iran if he 'thinks Senator Obama’s going to win’

On Fox News Sunday this morning, Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol said that President Bush is more likely to attack Iran if he believes Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) is going to be elected.

Interview on Fox Link: http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/22/kristol-bush-iran/

This is sooo dumb that I think Bush might actually do it. But what's the advantage? Couldn't it back fire on the republicans? Wouldn't Bush know that, that would increase the price of oil around the world and gas in America?

Would he attack Iran so that Obama could be a clear winner?
 

StoOgE

First tragedy, then farce.
Vinzer Deling said:
So I'm not entitled to the fruits of MY labor?

Except the wealthy are more likely to make their income from investments which is taxed at a lower rate and take advantage of tax loopholes. So their income tax rate has to be higher to give some sense of parity with people who cant take advantage of such things due to lack of income.

Warren Buffets income tax rate is much much higher than his assistant, yet he pays a lower % of his income in taxes than she does.
 

scorcho

testicles on a cold fall morning
Gaborn said:
His point though is it's perfectly "fair" (maybe not right, but fair) to take the same percentage of the "Fruits of his labor" as it were as people with less, so if you have, to continues the analogy 10 apples, and the government takes one, and if you have 100 the government takes ten, that's fair. But why be forced to give the government 15? or 20? or 40? You worked hard to produce that many, you worked hard, you worked overtime, and you get penalized for doing so? That's the part that isn't right.
considering the government sets in place the infrastructure to enable someone to earn that much money, it's equally 'fair' for the government to charge a higher tax rate to those making better use of it.
 
mckmas8808 said:
This is sooo dumb that I think Bush might actually do it. But what's the advantage? Couldn't it back fire on the republicans? Wouldn't Bush know that, that would increase the price of oil around the world and gas in America?

Would he attack Iran so that Obama could be a clear winner?

The advantage is that he'll create so big of a mess that Obama can't possibly clean it up in 4 years. When the next election comes around, they'll be able to say that he didn't make nearly as much change as he said he was going to.
 
mckmas8808 said:
This is sooo dumb that I think Bush might actually do it. But what's the advantage? Couldn't it back fire on the republicans? Wouldn't Bush know that, that would increase the price of oil around the world and gas in America?

Would he attack Iran so that Obama could be a clear winner?

Actually, that wouldn't surprise me. If Bush could find any reason to attack Iran, he'll do it. Attacking Israel is pretty much an instant war with anyone in the middle east. Rightfully so, though.
 

Gaborn

Member
scorcho said:
considering the government sets in place the infrastructure to enable someone to earn that much money, it's equally 'fair' for the government to charge a higher tax rate to those making better use of it.

Punishing based on ability to get other people to give you their money for a good or a service? That's fair, to punish the excellent in society?
 

TDG

Banned
Deus Ex Machina said:
Kristol: Bush might bomb Iran if he 'thinks Senator Obama’s going to win’

On Fox News Sunday this morning, Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol said that President Bush is more likely to attack Iran if he believes Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) is going to be elected.

Interview on Fox Link: http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/22/kristol-bush-iran/
I've got to be honest, maybe I'm naive, but I don't believe any of these "The Republicans will do anything to stop Obama" conspiracy theories I hear.
 

scorcho

testicles on a cold fall morning
Gaborn said:
Punishing based on ability to get other people to give you their money for a good or a service? That's fair, to punish the excellent in society?
since 'society' collectively put in place the mechanisms for said person to make such a cash, then yes.

and it's not a punishment.
 
Gaborn said:
Punishing based on ability to get other people to give you their money for a good or a service? That's fair, to punish the excellent in society?
I love this blind faith in capitalism, as if income is truly distributed in proportion to who works hardest or is most deserving.

:lol
 

Zaptruder

Banned
Vinzer Deling said:
So I'm not entitled to the fruits of MY labor?

You're absolutely entitled to the fruits of your labor. But don't conflate the idea that the money you are paid is all yours to begin with. Many services that are provided that are not charged directly are done so through your taxes.
 

TDG

Banned
GrotesqueBeauty said:
I love this blind faith in capitalism, as if income is truly distributed in proportion to who works hardest or is most deserving.

:lol
Yeah, no kidding. It's crazy that people actually believe that.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
WickedAngel said:
The advantage is that he'll create so big of a mess that Obama can't possibly clean it up in 4 years. When the next election comes around, they'll be able to say that he didn't make nearly as much change as he said he was going to.


But couldn't he just ask for 4 more years to clean up Bush's mess? I mean Afghanistan, Iraq, then Iran? How and who expects Obama to fix all of that in 4 years?
 

Gaborn

Member
GrotesqueBeauty said:
I love this blind faith in capitalism, as if income is truly distributed in proportion to who works hardest or is most deserving.

:lol

Well, it's hard to quantify "most deserving," by what standard after all? I think someone who volunteers hundreds of hours a year helping the blind, driving a book mobile, helping at a soup kitchen, etc is doing something incredibly important and deserves a big thanks, but they're obviously not getting paid for that. Still though, to get large sums of money like we're talking about and to earn it every year you're ultimately soaking them with a higher tax rate because that's the money they make from other people. Money doesn't come from nowhere, it comes generally from your interaction with other people, you're providing a more valuable good or a service because it is more popular.

Not exactly a difficult concept for most people.
 

scorcho

testicles on a cold fall morning
the disgruntled gamer said:
Yeah, no kidding. It's crazy that people actually believe that.
milton%20friedman.jpg


Vinzer Deling said:
look at all the college student socialist fucks talking about being poor. You fucks haven't worked a hard day's work in your entire lives. :lol
?

once Obama's 75% tax bracket takes effect i'm going to laugh hard.
 
mckmas8808 said:
But couldn't he just ask for 4 more years to clean up Bush's mess? I mean Afghanistan, Iraq, then Iran? How and who expects Obama to fix all of that in 4 years?

A lot of people are deluding themselves into thinking that change is going to come immediately after the election and they're in for a rude awakening. Most people don't understand that the kinds of changes that Obama is suggesting are going to take time. The deficit, the economy, health care, the energy problem, the inflation, Iraq...that's a lot to get done in four years and you can bet your ass that coming up short of any of that will result in "I TOLD YOU SO!" from the right, regardless of whether or not they're logically sound arguments to make.

Vinzer Deling said:
look at all the college student socialist fucks talking about being poor. You fucks haven't worked a hard day's work in your entire lives. :lol

Tell us what you do and we'll see if it's comparable to picking cotton/tobacco and bailing hay in 95+ heat with 90+% humidity.
 

Amir0x

Banned
Vinzer Deling said:
look at all the college student socialist fucks talking about being poor. You fucks haven't worked a hard day's work in your entire lives. :lol

whoa whoa whoa, I think you're about to take the rhetoric one step too far into insulting territory. We welcome opposing viewpoints, but if you're going to generalize all of us in one way or another - specifically to imply we're all somehow hippie socialists who have never done a days hard labor - you're gonna banned.

Only warning.
 

gkryhewy

Member
Vinzer Deling said:
look at all the college student socialist fucks talking about being poor. You fucks haven't worked a hard day's work in your entire lives. :lol

Conservative dragging out the strawman. This is new. Give him a good whack.
 
Vinzer Deling said:
look at all the college student socialist fucks talking about being poor. You fucks haven't worked a hard day's work in your entire lives. :lol
And you're the brilliantly pragmatic post graduate who got their humble start washing dishes inbetween 13 hour shifts in an unsafe coalmine, am I right?

This is such an easy game to play, let's do it again sometime!
 
Vinzer Deling said:
and??

I worked my ass off to finish college and get a well paying job. I worked full time 3rd shifts doing some crummy and hazardous work to pay my way. So now that I've made some financial gains for all my toils, I should be penalized for it!

Why even let people people make that much money?


Honestly, I think there is a growing sense among even those that benefit most from the tax cuts that our system is broken right now.

Because you are being penalized already. There are millions of people on the brink of ruin. And forget the moral side of whether anyone should care, the fact is regardless, you pay for their collective misfortunes. It 's hitting the value of your home, and affects the strength of our currency (which contributes to inflation across the board).

A slight shift in the tax burden might mean a downgraded home theater system for you, and could make the difference in someone else getting evicted.

There is an upside for you if you can help prevent the lower class from being completely ground into dust. Again, forgetting the moral side, there's a lot more money to be made in that scenario, even if it's taxed at a higher rate.

So trying to put the country's economic policy more in line with what we had in the 90's (which is what Obama has proposed) certainly has a lot of appeal even among the wealthy.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Zaptruder said:
You're absolutely entitled to the fruits of your labor. But don't conflate the idea that the money you are paid is all yours to begin with. Many services that are provided that are not charged directly are done so through your taxes.


This is something that libertarins and some republicans have to remember. Those roads you drive on have to get paid by somebody.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom