siamesedreamer said:Reputation?
Oh...you must mean the juvenile phrase attached to my username a mod cooked up in the cloak of annonymity for the sole purpose of mocking me in a perpetual violation of their own terms of service. Otherwise known as my tag. Is that what you're referring to?
It's pretty straightforward, as we win, costs will go down with a smaller footprint over time, and those savings will go to deficit reduction. It's really the logical extension of Senator McCain's position as articulated in the 2013 speech. Achieving success in Iraq would obviously lead to reduced expenditures on the effort.
Me said:Politicians on the state and federal level talk about waste and fraud a lot. Generally, it's a way of putting off the reality of the budget by pretending you can get just as good services for less cash.
GhaleonEB said:TPM asked the McCain camp how they were going to balance the budget, given that they've release no numbers at all for their proposals. Here's what came back:
But they have no numbers to back it up - literally none. It's just a promise. :lol
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/203019.php
It's on, bitch.speculawyer said:I wonder if this could backfire on Obama in some way.
I could see a massive crowd like that Portland, Oregon crowd gathering in some European country like Germany (or worse, France!) to see him speak. Such a love-fest might cause a backlash in the USA where some would say "See . . . those commie athiest cheese-eating surrender monkeys love him so he must be bad!"
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080707/ap_on_el_pr/democratic_conventionSeparately, one official confirmed that Obama's aides were attempting to arrange a speech at a second dramatic venue: Berlin's Brandenburg Gate, part of Obama's July trip to Europe and the Middle East.
The Gate was the site of one of Ronald Reagan's most memorable speeches. On a trip in July 1987, Reagan stood before throngs of West Berliners and implored then Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev to tear down the Berlin Wall dividing the city. The wall is no longer there.
By that logic, he just admitted that Obama will bring the defict under control much faster. :lolIt's pretty straightforward, as we win, costs will go down with a smaller footprint over time, and those savings will go to deficit reduction. It's really the logical extension of Senator McCain's position as articulated in the 2013 speech. Achieving success in Iraq would obviously lead to reduced expenditures on the effort.
Name: Barack O'DonnellTamanon said:BTW, I hadn't realized how far along Norah O'Donnell had been, she gave birth this weekend.
Here's the distinction:speculawyer said:By that logic, he just admitted that Obama will bring the defict under control much faster. :lol
speculawyer said:It's on, bitch.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080707/ap_on_el_pr/democratic_convention
Ich bin ein black Berliner.
Edit: Seriously . . . Obama has a pretty big following in Germany. The mention of Reagan was the wrong president . . . it is JFK that the Germans compare him t.
Bishman said:Politics is so boring with Hillary out. Can Poli-GAF give me a summary of what has happened in the last 3 weeks?
I agree . . . and the Obama team needs to work on a response.GhaleonEB said:Here's the distinction:
Obama will cut costs by withdrawing the troops
McCain will do it by winning
I expected them to frame Iraq on those terms...but the budget?! :lol
Interesting. Could backfire since he's declined all of McCain's townhall invitations.reilo said:Obama giving his economic policy speech in St Louis because he could not get to North Carolina due to airplane problems.
He's speaking in front of dozens* of people.
*Still more people than have ever seen McCain speak
It's on MSNBC now.
He's challenging McCain to a debate about taxes.
Rather, McCain rejected Obama's counterproposal.GhaleonEB said:Interesting. Could backfire since he's declined all of McCain's townhall invitations.
True, it went both ways. Mutual rejection.Hitokage said:Rather, McCain rejected Obama's counterproposal.
"Last week I communicated to Senator Obama and his presidential campaign my firm intention to remain in the United States Senate, where I believe I am best equipped to serve the people of Virginia and this country. Under no circumstances will I be a candidate for Vice President."
Hitokage said:Rather, McCain rejected Obama's counterproposal.
PhoenixDark said:Challenging people to debates? That's usually a sign of desperation, at least in this election (Romney, Hillary, McCain town halls). Obama has had a horrible two weeks or so and wants to change the narrative away from Iraq and towards his strong point. I don't buy the idea that Iraq is somehow McCain's strong point now but it's seeming more unlikely that the "end the war" rhetoric is particularly advantageous
PhoenixDark said:Challenging people to debates? That's usually a sign of desperation, at least in this election (Romney, Hillary, McCain town halls). Obama has had a horrible two weeks or so and wants to change the narrative away from Iraq and towards his strong point. I don't buy the idea that Iraq is somehow McCain's strong point now but it's seeming more unlikely that the "end the war" rhetoric is particularly advantageous
avatar299 said:off-topic but has olbermann ever touched more upon his opinion on fisa, or does he still believe that fisa is okay as long as Obama uses it to attack Bush?
if i recall correctly, Olbermann basically said that because Obama's virtuous and his shit smells so good, he can have all the power he wants without any checks. then he mumbled something about Obama having a secret plan concerning FISA...yeah.avatar299 said:off-topic but has olbermann ever touched more upon his opinion on fisa, or does he still believe that fisa is okay as long as Obama uses it to attack Bush?
reilo said:Kerry being floated around as a possible Veep now?
Interesting.
bob_arctor said:Floated by who? And that shit ain't gonna happen.
Amir0x said:I think that's a bad idea and they should feel bad for thinking it.
Didn't Kerry vote to authorize the war? That's something Obama's been campaigning agains, both with McCain and Clinton. "A war that should never have been authorized and never been waged."reilo said:MSNBC just threw it up there, so I guess by the media just throwing out any name to see if it sticks.
Kerry as Veep?
Webb has put out a statement saying he is not interestd in being veep, period. So yea, he's out.speculawyer said:The VP situation seems to be getting difficult I guess most of these are pretty much no chance:
Obama/Bloomberg
Obama/Gore
Obama/Webb
Obama/Wesley Clark
I think of construction workers.reilo said:Quick question to everyone.
When you hear the media talk about the "hard working blue-collar middle class", does the image of a long-haul truck driver show up in your mind or do you not think of them as part of that base?
At the Democratic National Convention next month, we're going to kick off the general election with an event that opens up the political process the same way we've opened it up throughout this campaign.
Barack has made it clear that this is your convention, not his.
On Thursday, August 28th, he's scheduled to formally accept the Democratic nomination in a speech at the convention hall in front of the assembled delegates.
Instead, Barack will leave the convention hall and join more than 75,000 people for a huge, free, open-air event where he will deliver his acceptance speech to the American people.
RubxQub said:I think of construction workers.
domokunrox said:I'm sure this horn has already been tooted, but Hilary is still viable on the account that if shes on the ticket, then you pretty much already won AK, Penn, Ohio, WV, and FL. All of which amounts to the biggest landslide victory quite possibly in US history.
I really don't see why not since Obama has pretty much already stated that Hilary is going to be the wingman on Healthcare.
yes, the monolithic press will - in unison across all forms of media - jump down McCain's throats and finally anoint Obama as the Second Coming.mckmas8808 said:So is the MSM going to jump down McCain's throat for basically guaranteeing withdraw within his first regardless of what we see now?
domokunrox said:I'm sure this horn has already been tooted, but Hilary is still viable on the account that if shes on the ticket, then you pretty much already won AK, Penn, Ohio, WV, and FL. All of which amounts to the biggest landslide victory quite possibly in US history.
reilo said:She undermines what Obama is about? She is an old-school politician with big-money financing [read: lobbyists], and she voted for the war in Iraq.
domokunrox said:I wouldn't say she undermines what Obama is about. Shes a very polarizing figure, and rightfully so. However, that isn't her fault. If shes that popular and this personal, then maybe shes just too well qualified for the job?
"Old school", I'm sorry, anyone who says these sort of things just automatically makes you a complete prick. Thats like saying The Beatles suck because they were big in the 60s.
An Obama/Clinton ticket doesn't mean that Clinton is going to take over. This is not a Bush/Cheney ticket ok? Clinton will certainly stand behind Obama, shes already stated that many times with or without being on the ticket. Stop hating her already. Its been like a month already? Get over it.
Clinton voted for the war in iraq, but did Obama vote? No, he didn't. so I'm not sure he has room to talk when he used that against her. There are several Dems who have endorsed Obama and they voted for the Iraq war, was there a problem with them as well? Would you like me to make a list of every other DEM Senator that voted for the war?
speculawyer said:The VP situation seems to be getting difficult I guess most of these are pretty much no chance:
Obama/Bloomberg
Obama/Gore
Obama/Webb
Obama/Wesley Clark