The Librarian
Banned
:lolGhaleonEB said:Also: I'm no fan of moveon.org, but this is hilarious: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/07/28/1228960.aspx
:lolGhaleonEB said:Also: I'm no fan of moveon.org, but this is hilarious: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/07/28/1228960.aspx
Tamanon said:I believe the narrative will be "why can't he close the deal 3 months out?"
But McCain, running a flawed campaign in a big Democratic year, is dangerously close. He still could back in unless Obama closes the deal.
RiskyChris said:Why am I getting a call from 323 330 1462? I think it's Obama's campaign, but I am afraid to answer now. Is it phone banking? I've gotten it like 2 dozen times.
http://800notes.com/Phone.aspx/1-323-330-1462RiskyChris said:Why am I getting a call from 323 330 1462? I think it's Obama's campaign, but I am afraid to answer now. Is it phone banking? I've gotten it like 2 dozen times.
tanod said:You sound bitter.
I don't think you've read up on Obama's supposed "tax increases".perfectchaos007 said:I am. I was really hoping that for my first election I could find a candidate to really get behind. Some one I would WANT to win the election. There's only 2 things I really want from a candidate. 1. I want our troops to come home from this expensive war thats going no where, and McCain would keep them there for 100 years so he's out of the question. And 2. with these economic tough times I don't think raising taxes would be the best idea. Sure it would slow down our national debt, but in the times of economic crisis, you shouldn't worry about fixing the debt, you should first get people back on their feet financially, THEN work on the national debt. So Obama is out of the question.
Ron Paul was my guy who fit the criteria, but since he dropped out, I think I will feel more proud to be an American if I voted for Mickey Mouse in November.
perfectchaos007 said:I am. I was really hoping that for my first election I could find a candidate to really get behind. Some one I would WANT to win the election. There's only 2 things I really want from a candidate. 1. I want our troops to come home from this expensive war thats going no where, and McCain would keep them there for 100 years so he's out of the question. And 2. with these economic tough times I don't think raising taxes would be the best idea. Sure it would slow down our national debt, but in the times of economic crisis, you shouldn't worry about fixing the debt, you should first get people back on their feet financially, THEN work on the national debt. So Obama is out of the question.
perfectchaos007 said:...you should first get people back on their feet financially...
Ron Paul was my guy who fit the criteria
perfectchaos007 said:I am. I was really hoping that for my first election I could find a candidate to really get behind. Some one I would WANT to win the election. There's only 2 things I really want from a candidate. 1. I want our troops to come home from this expensive war thats going no where, and McCain would keep them there for 100 years so he's out of the question. And 2. with these economic tough times I don't think raising taxes would be the best idea. Sure it would slow down our national debt, but in the times of economic crisis, you shouldn't worry about fixing the debt, you should first get people back on their feet financially, THEN work on the national debt. So Obama is out of the question.
Ron Paul was my guy who fit the criteria, but since he dropped out, I think I will feel more proud to be an American if I voted for Mickey Mouse in November.
Nader?Hootie said:Vote for Peter North or something.
Tamanon said:
as someone else mentioned, you should actually read each candidate's platforms instead of - i assume - basing it on talking points or ideological biases.perfectchaos007 said:And 2. with these economic tough times I don't think raising taxes would be the best idea. Sure it would slow down our national debt, but in the times of economic crisis, you shouldn't worry about fixing the debt, you should first get people back on their feet financially, THEN work on the national debt. So Obama is out of the question.
perfectchaos007 said:I am. I was really hoping that for my first election I could find a candidate to really get behind. Some one I would WANT to win the election. There's only 2 things I really want from a candidate. 1. I want our troops to come home from this expensive war thats going no where, and McCain would keep them there for 100 years so he's out of the question. And 2. with these economic tough times I don't think raising taxes would be the best idea. Sure it would slow down our national debt, but in the times of economic crisis, you shouldn't worry about fixing the debt, you should first get people back on their feet financially, THEN work on the national debt. So Obama is out of the question.
Ron Paul was my guy who fit the criteria, but since he dropped out, I think I will feel more proud to be an American if I voted for Mickey Mouse in November.
perfectchaos007 said:2. with these economic tough times I don't think raising taxes would be the best idea. Sure it would slow down our national debt, but in the times of economic crisis, you shouldn't worry about fixing the debt, you should first get people back on their feet financially, THEN work on the national debt. So Obama is out of the question.
RubxQub said:I don't think you've read up on Obama's supposed "tax increases".
http://www.issues2000.org/Economic/Barack_Obama_Tax_Reform.htm
grandjedi6 said:Yeah, the anti- Iraq War Republicans were pretty much S.O.L. this election cycle. Instead of Mickey Mouse you might as well write in Ron Paul, no?
Dax01 said:Nader?
really?perfectchaos007 said:Yeah but he's pushing for higher social security taxes. Which sucks for me since social security won't exist when I'm of age
watperfectchaos007 said:Yeah but he's pushing for higher social security taxes. Which sucks for me since social security won't exist when I'm of age.
The Lamonster said:So where the hell is Bill Clinton?? When is he going to officially endorse? When is he going to get out there and make a big speech about it?????
scorcho said:really?
The reason he's increasing those is to shore up the program so that is is around. And IIRC, the increase is also only on the wealthy.perfectchaos007 said:Yeah but he's pushing for higher social security taxes. Which sucks for me since social security won't exist when I'm of age
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hyEHa5vNXXyk_a13jhW9zJeN7m8QD926N1H80perfectchaos007 said:Yeah, social security is already having troubles. All the baby boomers are retiring and the government is having trouble writing all these people checks. The money will run dry before I retire.
GhaleonEB said:The reason he's increasing those is to shore up the program so that is is around. And IIRC, the increase is also only on the wealthy.
And worst case scenario right now, SS will have to cut payments in 40 years or so - not shut down entirely.
Clinton is heading to Africa for an AIDS campaign iirc.The Lamonster said:So where the hell is Bill Clinton?? When is he going to officially endorse? When is he going to get out there and make a big speech about it?????
a better question is 'who cares' - Obama isn't hurting for it, and there's a bigger negative involved with Bill's loose lips.The Lamonster said:So where the hell is Bill Clinton?? When is he going to officially endorse? When is he going to get out there and make a big speech about it?????
Yup, it needs to be reformed. You should also be doing you own long-term or retirement planning.perfectchaos007 said:Still it looks like regardless I'm going to be working till I'm 80 so whats the point? I wouldn't mind if they got rid of it all together tbqh so I can invest it now how I please in bonds or CD's. But social security was created during the last depression in the 20's was it not? And even then they knew it wouldn't last forever.
RubxQub said:http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hyEHa5vNXXyk_a13jhW9zJeN7m8QD926N1H80
READ BEFORE YOU POST!
The tax hike is only on people making more than $250,000 bucks. Even if SS dries up...you're not getting dinged for it.
perfectchaos007 said:I can't find where he specifies if this is per person or per family. If its per person then my family is in the clear, but if its per family then higher taxes for us. And besides even wealthy people are struggling in these times too. Look at Ed McMan. I'd feel sorry for anyone getting tax increases in these times.
Social Security gets taken out per-paycheck on an individual basis.perfectchaos007 said:I can't find where he specifies if this is per person or per family. If its per person then my family is in the clear, but if its per family then higher taxes for us. And besides even wealthy people are struggling in these times too. Look at Ed McMan. I'd feel sorry for anyone getting tax increases in these times.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/11/news/economy/candidates_taxproposals_tpc/index.htm?cnn=yesperfectchaos007 said:I can't find where he specifies if this is per person or per family. If its per person then my family is in the clear, but if its per family then higher taxes for us. And besides even wealthy people are struggling in these times too. Look at Ed McMan. I'd feel sorry for anyone getting tax increases in these times.
Yeah, it's per person.Tamanon said:Considering it's a payroll tax, I don't see any way it could be applied to per-family.
McCain said:Im not going to telegraph a lot of the things that Im going to do because then it might compromise our ability to do so. But, look, I know the area, I have been there, I know wars, I know how to win wars, and I know how to improve our capabilities so that we will capture Osama bin Laden or put it this way, bring him to justice We will do it, I know how to do it.
RubxQub said:
perfectchaos007 said:Still it looks like regardless I'm going to be working till I'm 80 so whats the point? I wouldn't mind if they got rid of it all together tbqh so I can invest it now how I please in bonds or CD's. But social security was created during the last depression in the 20's was it not? And even then they knew it wouldn't last forever.
McCain, I would appreciate it if you tell us exactly how to capture Osama Bin Laden.bob_arctor said::lol Good thing Obama's the only presumptuous candidate.
bob_arctor said::lol Good thing Obama's the only presumptuous candidate.
Yeah, I posted it more to confirm the source more than to point out the crazy comments.ConfusingJazz said:There are some fine examples of assholes in that link.
He knows how to win wars? Wars, plural? I guess being alive for WWII and the Persian Gulf War makes that sentence work.bob_arctor said::lol Good thing Obama's the only presumptuous candidate.
Dax01 said:McCain, I would appreciate it if you tell us exactly how to capture Osama Bin Laden.
I would really appreciate it.
RubxQub said:Yeah, I posted it more to confirm the source more than to point out the crazy comments.
Still...getting spam called like that probably isn't a good way to gain supporters.
Mandark said:Go buy a history textbook with a quickness.
There are strategic reasons! Campaign strategy, of course.harSon said:They asked him on CNN and he said he couldn't give specifics for 'strategic reasons'
Such a load of bullshit :lol