Hickbilly Deluxe
Banned
you're defending a piece of shit don't get on a fucking high horse calling me disgusting
So are you, both sides were wrong. Get off your own damn horse.
you're defending a piece of shit don't get on a fucking high horse calling me disgusting
Solid counter argument. Real good stuff here. I guess literary references invalidate arguments now. (I made a movie reference, too. Is my opinion double-invalid? Does that cancel out?)
Rape culture:a society or environment whose prevailing social attitudes have the effect of normalizing or trivializing sexual assault and abuse.how in the fuck is him saying you deserve to be raped a difference of opinion
This thread happened later than all of that, but you still have people here seeing it as just an opinion.
how in the fuck is him saying you deserve to be raped a difference of opinion
Maybe you should learn to read because I never said he should be legally assaulted with a weapon. A public demonstration can still be threatening in a way that suggests personal confrontations. He shouldn't be doing this outside a school.It's almost as if a public demonanstration and a personal confrontation aren't the same thing ... hmmm. Nope.
Someone defending themselves against someone that is threatening to rape them is vigilantism?Do we have to support vigilantism to be good people?
Looks like he was arrested back in September for an assault of his own.
http://www.tucsonnewsnow.com/story/33142004/controversial-brother-dean-arrested-on-assault-charge
Probably a more updated story than this.
Whew, I get not agreeing with her methods but thinking that a person who hit someone (that wasn't even a serious injury) who is advocating for school girls to be raped and assaulted a woman is a piece of shit is funny.So are you, both sides were wrong. Get off your own damn horse.
The law certainly has been selectively applied, which is fucking terrible and a huge stain on our country's history and present day.Rape is sexual violence, he's advocating for rape, i.e. violence, that isn't protected under law, AND, U.S. law is INSANELY fickle, black people have been murdered literally for sitting down while the officer got off scot-free yet for some reason in this situation the law is the most important thing ever when a grown ass man is advocating for the sexual assault of teenagers.
The law certainly has been selectively applied, which is fucking terrible and a huge stain on our country's history and present day.
That doesn't mean I want people to take it into their own hands to create "justice" as they see fit.
Even if this dude were inciting violence, the appropriate response is to call the police unless there is an imminent threat (dude with sign... not an imminent threat).
Do you consider the phrase "you deserve to be murdered" to not be a threat either? And how is he not an imminent threat when he genuinely went on to later unprovoked, assault a woman at another school? How is he not an imminent threat by advocating for sexual violence against teenagers? What the actual fuck am I reading?!The law certainly has been selectively applied, which is fucking terrible and a huge stain on our country's history and present day.
That doesn't mean I want people to take it into their own hands to create "justice" as they see fit.
Even if this dude were inciting violence, the appropriate response is to call the police unless there is an imminent threat (dude with sign... not an imminent threat).
Did he assault a woman right there and then? Do you not understand the context/meaning of imminent?It's fucking funny how you ignore that he went on to assault a woman. Not an imminent threat my ass.
What is it with the defense forces always ignoring important facts?
"imagine a world where you can justify violence because of beliefs or a feeling of righteousness"
Yeah, we already have that, it's called "the real world" where actions, violence and everything else is accompanied by contextual triggers that validate or invalidate it. It's why we have self defense laws, it's why we have hate crime statutes.
My agreeing and validating of this incident doesn't provide blanket acceptance of all violence against all people I don't like.
The world doesn't work that way, the mind doesn't work that way, morality doesn't work that way.
Stop trying to defend people that actively try to kill people with bats.
So many disgusting posts here. Fuck hell, I don't even know what to say.
Context is everything, isn't it?Do you consider the phrase "you deserve to be murdered" to not be a thread either?
Did he assault a woman right there and then? Do you not understand the context/meaning of imminent?
So are you, both sides were wrong. Get off your own damn horse.
You're welcome to use the word incorrectly.Considering he assaulted someone in a similar situation, yes, I would call it imminent.
Yea context is everything, except that there's no nuance to the context ofContext is everything, isn't it?
If some random jackass in the street is holding a sign saying that? Nah. Shouting it indiscriminately as a public demonstration? Nah.
If someone holding a knife says it? Yep. If someone says it to me, personally, not as theater? Sure.
Context makes a difference.
You're welcome to use the word incorrectly.
Context is everything, isn't it?
If some random jackass in the street is holding a sign saying that? Nah. Shouting it indiscriminately as a public demonstration? Nah.
If someone holding a knife says it? Yep. If someone says it to me, personally, not as theater? Sure.
Context makes a difference.
Speech inciting violence isn't protected and, as such, should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. Cool beans.
Where we differ in opinion here is that I don't see it as inciting violence. We can agree to disagree.
You're welcome to use the word incorrectly.
Since you brought up progressives I'll just go ahead and give my two cents. Democrats have shown us how useless they've been in the battle to shift the overton window. Republicans are now showing us they've got no problem backing up suspiciously treasonous SOBs in Washington and Montana is even trying to put someone guilty of assault on a reporter inside the house of representatives. This has been a long time coming and if younger progressives are willing to literally fight for what they think is right then I'm not going to get in their way and I'm not going to condemn either side too harshly.It's crazy the amount of things that have become acceptable to progressives. I'm not going to act like I haven't felt like many of the people in this thread on many occasions... But this isn't​ acceptable at all. I could even understand a punch or a slap better... But a baseball bat?
And even for a punch or a slap - this is super wrong. Obviously he's a hateful piece of trash, but this is basically how everything ever has been solved by any side. This is how the other side felt when the politician body slammed the reporter.
It's just... not right.
She deserves to be punished to the fullest extent of the law for what she did. We can't selectively apply the law because we don't like people's opinions.
These threads make me worry. You shouldn't be cool with assault because someone says something you don't like, even if it's truly vile shit.
Guy was an asshole, but he didn't deserve to be brained by a coward.
Ok, let's say it is. Is the punishment for inciting violence a bat to the head from a stranger?How the hell is it not inciting violence? You can argue semantically that it's not a direct threat, but this is such a clear, obvious case of inciting violence. Saying someone deserves to be met with violence is literally inciting violence. Full stop.
I'm mantyping on my phone too. In a few minutes I'll be mansleeping.You are mansplaining to a woman, what constitute a true rape threat. Jesus dude.......
I'm glad you're coming up with hypothetical reasons based on zero evidence to make the street preacher seem more innocent and not fully there in terms of mental capacity so he can be absolved of responsibility. Now it's on others to treat this hypothetically mentally insufficient individual. Interesting statement you're coming with.
no she isn't a piece of shit, she is somebody who isn't a fucking coward against people that promote disgusting things
using a bat may be a little much, but on no fucking level is she just as bad him
It's my genuine opinion. I'm not being slick, I'm imagining a world where people can justify violence because they don't like what someone says. It's a dangerous thing.
I'm not legitimizing his opinion, I'm not condoning it (if you read my post you'd see I think it's vile), but I don't think the response he got was warranted. Do you think you're slick for your opinion?
OMG so deep.
You attack someone with a bat, you are a piece of shit period. I don't care what they are saying.
I'm mantyping on my phone too. In a few minutes I'll be mansleeping.
You attack someone with a bat, you are a piece of shit period. I don't care what they are saying.
To be honest, it'd be helpful if people didn't quote responses from pages back after they've elaborated and corrected their posts.Gotta love a poster who both mocks someone for a sophomoric post while advocating a middleground "all opinions should be heard" stance.
This is a person who pushes hate speech on children, particularly some our most vulnerable children. Treating it as simply a matter of the preacher's words is incredibly reductive to how powerful hate speech can be.
To be honest, it'd be helpful if people didn't quote responses from pages back after they've elaborated and corrected their posts.
Whatever it is, it is not nearly as powerful as an aluminum bat to the head can be.
Assuming no prior convictions, he could potentially be charged and serve 3-5 years for inciting hate, inciting sexual violence against minors, and sexual harassment of unaccompanied minors here in British Columbia, as he should. The wording on his sign is pretty clear, though, and it would be extremely difficult to prosecute him for uttering threats of violence under current legislation. 3-year probation for a minor seems technically appropriate for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.
I'm baffled that his abhorrent conduct in such close proximity to a school can be considered lawful in the US.
You attack someone with a bat, you are a piece of shit period. I don't care what they are saying.
You are mansplaining to a woman, what constitute a true rape threat. Jesus dude.......
>_> We had a Republican nominee who vicariously advocated for executing gay people
An aluminum bat to the head is a lot less powerful.
She committed assault with a deadly weapon. If she's lucky they won't throw attempted murder charges at her. She deserves to be arrested.