• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Preacher w/ ‘you deserve to be raped’ sign hit over head by bat wielding woman

Solid counter argument. Real good stuff here. I guess literary references invalidate arguments now. (I made a movie reference, too. Is my opinion double-invalid? Does that cancel out?)

I explained why this argument sucks a couple of pages back.

I'm just amused I called it so succinctly

Look at basically ever country in the world with hate speech laws... none of them are hellish Orwellian landscapes.
 

Crossing Eden

Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
how in the fuck is him saying you deserve to be raped a difference of opinion
Rape culture:a society or environment whose prevailing social attitudes have the effect of normalizing or trivializing sexual assault and abuse.

That includes considering "you deserve to be raped" to women in a high school, by a dude who then went out to physically assault a woman, to be a mere difference of opinion
 

F0rneus

Tears in the rain
People who think the defense force here is disgusting, should look up the Karla Homolka thread. It's this thread but even worse.

Will cherish the PMs I got because of that thread forever.
 

Pau

Member
It's almost as if a public demonanstration and a personal confrontation aren't the same thing ... hmmm. Nope.
Maybe you should learn to read because I never said he should be legally assaulted with a weapon. A public demonstration can still be threatening in a way that suggests personal confrontations. He shouldn't be doing this outside a school.
 
So are you, both sides were wrong. Get off your own damn horse.
Whew, I get not agreeing with her methods but thinking that a person who hit someone (that wasn't even a serious injury) who is advocating for school girls to be raped and assaulted a woman is a piece of shit is funny.
 

Yayate

Member
full disclosure i agree that hitting him with a baseball bat was not the wisest idea and he should've just been arrested instead.

but really, not a threat? Just a shitty opinion?

If you go around demonstrating X and Y people should get horrifically murdered- is that just a shitty opinion too?

perhaps it failed in the definition of it inciting immediate violence.

but hey, fuckboy got arrested for assaulting a woman later on anyway. That makes the threat seem pretty legitimate to me.

now here's the problem.

This women is getting her life ruined with a felony charge. The guy is unimpeded and can go on to spread hate another day without any repercussions.
 
Rape is sexual violence, he's advocating for rape, i.e. violence, that isn't protected under law, AND, U.S. law is INSANELY fickle, black people have been murdered literally for sitting down while the officer got off scot-free yet for some reason in this situation the law is the most important thing ever when a grown ass man is advocating for the sexual assault of teenagers.
The law certainly has been selectively applied, which is fucking terrible and a huge stain on our country's history and present day.

That doesn't mean I want people to take it into their own hands to create "justice" as they see fit.

Even if this dude were inciting violence, the appropriate response is to call the police unless there is an imminent threat (dude with sign... not an imminent threat).
 

Veelk

Banned
I'm at the point that this kind of thing, inciting violence, should be met with criminal charges. Contrary to what many believe, freedom of speech does not mean you can say anything you want. If you yell "FIRE!" in a crowded room when there isn't one, it's illegal. It's illegal because it's dangerous to do so if it's not true.

Publically advocating sexual violence (again, to kids) should be considered dangerous. It should be legally considered a crime. It's not thought crime. He is free to have that vile opinion and free to express it in the confines of his own home and in private forums. In public places like a fucking school? No.

Until such a law is made, I am not going to begrudge people who handle it with the only effective response to these pieces of shit.
 

F0rneus

Tears in the rain
The law certainly has been selectively applied, which is fucking terrible and a huge stain on our country's history and present day.

That doesn't mean I want people to take it into their own hands to create "justice" as they see fit.

Even if this dude were inciting violence, the appropriate response is to call the police unless there is an imminent threat (dude with sign... not an imminent threat).

It's fucking funny how you ignore that he went on to assault a woman. Not an imminent threat my ass.

What is it with the defense forces always ignoring important facts?
 
"imagine a world where you can justify violence because of beliefs or a feeling of righteousness"

Yeah, we already have that, it's called "the real world" where actions, violence and everything else is accompanied by contextual triggers that validate or invalidate it. It's why we have self defense laws, it's why we have hate crime statutes.

My agreeing and validating of this incident doesn't provide blanket acceptance of all violence against all people I don't like.

The world doesn't work that way, the mind doesn't work that way, morality doesn't work that way.
 

Crossing Eden

Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
The law certainly has been selectively applied, which is fucking terrible and a huge stain on our country's history and present day.

That doesn't mean I want people to take it into their own hands to create "justice" as they see fit.

Even if this dude were inciting violence, the appropriate response is to call the police unless there is an imminent threat (dude with sign... not an imminent threat).
Do you consider the phrase "you deserve to be murdered" to not be a threat either? And how is he not an imminent threat when he genuinely went on to later unprovoked, assault a woman at another school? How is he not an imminent threat by advocating for sexual violence against teenagers? What the actual fuck am I reading?!
 
It's fucking funny how you ignore that he went on to assault a woman. Not an imminent threat my ass.

What is it with the defense forces always ignoring important facts?
Did he assault a woman right there and then? Do you not understand the context/meaning of imminent?
 
"imagine a world where you can justify violence because of beliefs or a feeling of righteousness"

Yeah, we already have that, it's called "the real world" where actions, violence and everything else is accompanied by contextual triggers that validate or invalidate it. It's why we have self defense laws, it's why we have hate crime statutes.

My agreeing and validating of this incident doesn't provide blanket acceptance of all violence against all people I don't like.

The world doesn't work that way, the mind doesn't work that way, morality doesn't work that way.

"but words don't mean anything!!! they're just things that come out of your mouth and you should ignore it no matter what the words actually mean (btw why can't i say the n-word?)"
 
Stop trying to defend people that actively try to kill people with bats.

So many disgusting posts here. Fuck hell, I don't even know what to say.

According to the courts she didn't try to kill the preacher, so don't make up bullshit about her trying to kill the preacher.
 
Do you consider the phrase "you deserve to be murdered" to not be a thread either?
Context is everything, isn't it?

If some random jackass in the street is holding a sign saying that? Nah. Shouting it indiscriminately as a public demonstration? Nah.

If someone holding a knife says it? Yep. If someone says it to me, personally, not as theater? Sure.

Context makes a difference.
 

Crossing Eden

Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
Context is everything, isn't it?

If some random jackass in the street is holding a sign saying that? Nah. Shouting it indiscriminately as a public demonstration? Nah.

If someone holding a knife says it? Yep. If someone says it to me, personally, not as theater? Sure.

Context makes a difference.
Yea context is everything, except that there's no nuance to the context of
A grown man is telling highschoolers specifically, not grown adults, not addressed to the teachers, but to the high schoolers specifically, that they deserve to be raped. A grown man that also unsurprisingly, later went on to assault a woman unprovoked while doing the exact same activity.
 

Eusis

Member
If you want to avoid violence then you aggressively need to remove people doing these sorts of things at inappropriate venues, otherwise violence ends up the only solution that will seem to work.

It's also what gets frustrating with free speech in the US, as important as it is we have chucklefucks like this who ruin it for everyone else.
 

F0rneus

Tears in the rain
Context is everything, isn't it?

If some random jackass in the street is holding a sign saying that? Nah. Shouting it indiscriminately as a public demonstration? Nah.

If someone holding a knife says it? Yep. If someone says it to me, personally, not as theater? Sure.

Context makes a difference.

You are mansplaining to a woman, what constitute a true rape threat. Jesus dude.......
 

Skyzard

Banned
At the very least he should have been banned from going near schools with any signs, possibly at all. And probably fined if not jailed for promoting rape.
 

Kazerei

Banned
Speech inciting violence isn't protected and, as such, should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. Cool beans.

Where we differ in opinion here is that I don't see it as inciting violence. We can agree to disagree.

How the hell is it not inciting violence? You can argue semantically that it's not a direct threat, but this is such a clear, obvious case of inciting violence. Saying someone deserves to be met with violence is literally inciting violence. Full stop.
 

MUnited83

For you.
You're welcome to use the word incorrectly.

If someone regularly tells people they deserve to die then proceeds to assault them, yes, they are a imminent threat. If someone with such a history of doing such started telling you that you wouldnt consider it a threat despite the fact that he will in all likelihood attack you?
 
It's crazy the amount of things that have become acceptable to progressives. I'm not going to act like I haven't felt like many of the people in this thread on many occasions... But this isn't​ acceptable at all. I could even understand a punch or a slap better... But a baseball bat?

And even for a punch or a slap - this is super wrong. Obviously he's a hateful piece of trash, but this is basically how everything ever has been solved by any side. This is how the other side felt when the politician body slammed the reporter.

It's just... not right.
Since you brought up progressives I'll just go ahead and give my two cents. Democrats have shown us how useless they've been in the battle to shift the overton window. Republicans are now showing us they've got no problem backing up suspiciously treasonous SOBs in Washington and Montana is even trying to put someone guilty of assault on a reporter inside the house of representatives. This has been a long time coming and if younger progressives are willing to literally fight for what they think is right then I'm not going to get in their way and I'm not going to condemn either side too harshly.

Let the Richard Spencers, Milos and other alt-right assholes of the world quake in the boots. Maybe that'll make Republicans think twice about nurturing these heartless pricks all across America.
 

Debirudog

Member
She deserves to be punished to the fullest extent of the law for what she did. We can't selectively apply the law because we don't like people's opinions.

These threads make me worry. You shouldn't be cool with assault because someone says something you don't like, even if it's truly vile shit.

Guy was an asshole, but he didn't deserve to be brained by a coward.

A coward who went ahead and bashed an ugly racist's head...hmmm....

Dude was asking for it.
 
How the hell is it not inciting violence? You can argue semantically that it's not a direct threat, but this is such a clear, obvious case of inciting violence. Saying someone deserves to be met with violence is literally inciting violence. Full stop.
Ok, let's say it is. Is the punishment for inciting violence a bat to the head from a stranger?
You are mansplaining to a woman, what constitute a true rape threat. Jesus dude.......
I'm mantyping on my phone too. In a few minutes I'll be mansleeping.
 
I'm glad you're coming up with hypothetical reasons based on zero evidence to make the street preacher seem more innocent and not fully there in terms of mental capacity so he can be absolved of responsibility. Now it's on others to treat this hypothetically mentally insufficient individual. Interesting statement you're coming with.

The article actually suggested it with "not a full deck". And you know damn well that a person like that would be removed from the street for further processing in Western Europe. Because obviously he did make a threat and nobody disagrees with that. But I'm here reading a brief OP, not having a full context. Also, as much as I enjoy my biblical smiting power fantasies, when it comes to reality, I really cannot support corporal violence. That includes people who should be, and are, in a jail cell.
 
It's my genuine opinion. I'm not being slick, I'm imagining a world where people can justify violence because they don't like what someone says. It's a dangerous thing.

I'm not legitimizing his opinion, I'm not condoning it (if you read my post you'd see I think it's vile), but I don't think the response he got was warranted. Do you think you're slick for your opinion?

OMG so deep.

Gotta love a poster who both mocks someone for a sophomoric post while advocating a middleground "all opinions should be heard" stance.

You attack someone with a bat, you are a piece of shit period. I don't care what they are saying.

This is a person who pushes hate speech on children, particularly some our most vulnerable children. Treating it as simply a matter of the preacher's words is incredibly reductive to how powerful hate speech can be.
 
You attack someone with a bat, you are a piece of shit period. I don't care what they are saying.

wow, i have the same opinion but the other way around, if you spout racist shit on the street, you are a piece of shit period.

the bat thing on the other hand, i mean theres different contexts and reasons for someone to use a bat, don't write them all off you feel me
 
Assuming no prior convictions, he could potentially be charged and serve 3-5 years for inciting hate, inciting sexual violence against minors, and sexual harassment of unaccompanied minors here in British Columbia, as he should. The wording on his sign is pretty clear, though, and it would be extremely difficult to prosecute him for uttering threats of violence under current legislation. 3-year probation for a minor seems technically appropriate for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

I'm baffled that his abhorrent conduct in such close proximity to a school can be considered lawful in the US.
 

Euphor!a

Banned
This is a person who pushes hate speech on children, particularly some our most vulnerable children. Treating it as simply a matter of the preacher's words is incredibly reductive to how powerful hate speech can be.


Whatever it is, it is not nearly as powerful as an aluminum bat to the head can be.
 
To be honest, it'd be helpful if people didn't quote responses from pages back after they've elaborated and corrected their posts.

Firstly, the poster did not elaborate in that post.

Secondly, what elaboration is there to mocking someone?

Whatever it is, it is not nearly as powerful as an aluminum bat to the head can be.

>_> We had a Republican nominee who vicariously advocated for executing gay people

An aluminum bat to the head is a lot less powerful.
 
This is when I propound the story to my friends and family to see if I really am wrong or if I just stumbled into Gaf crazy town, heh. Baseball bats and heads do not go well together, you guys do know that, right? If someone slapped him or gave him a punch to the gut I'd be applauding.
 
Assuming no prior convictions, he could potentially be charged and serve 3-5 years for inciting hate, inciting sexual violence against minors, and sexual harassment of unaccompanied minors here in British Columbia, as he should. The wording on his sign is pretty clear, though, and it would be extremely difficult to prosecute him for uttering threats of violence under current legislation. 3-year probation for a minor seems technically appropriate for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

I'm baffled that his abhorrent conduct in such close proximity to a school can be considered lawful in the US.

its not only lawful but people actually are lining up to defend it! crazy country amirite
 
You attack someone with a bat, you are a piece of shit period. I don't care what they are saying.

There is self-defense, and in this case might actually be a valid defense motive.

ideally, he should have been removed long before it got to that point.

edit: but yes, people are underestimating the potential for manslaughter here, which is very doable with a bat.
 
You are mansplaining to a woman, what constitute a true rape threat. Jesus dude.......

Don't be ridiculous.

My first post in this thread was to mock the shithead by saying he deserved to be hit with a bat.

The guy is a piece of shit. Fuck him, hope he rots.

That being said, he wasn't threatening any individual, and hitting someone with a bat from behind when there is no imminent threat does not constitute self defence.
 
Top Bottom