-Plasma Reus-
Service guarantees member status
What a stupid cunt. Imagine if her kid stole something, should they be ran over with a 4x4.Yeah no shit.
Snatching a purse vs. running someone down with an SUV.
Jesus.
What a stupid cunt. Imagine if her kid stole something, should they be ran over with a 4x4.Yeah no shit.
Snatching a purse vs. running someone down with an SUV.
The failed humanity is about the people in the article and this very thread stating that the response was understandable and appropriate. We like to at least pretend we're civilized. Obviously, quite a number of us are not.
It is quite frankly horrifying that so many would justify her actions. It's literally mind boggling.
if the thief was running away? No. That would be murder/manslaughter.
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/PE/htm/PE.9.htmSec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:
(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and
(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or
(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and
(3) he reasonably believes that:
(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or
(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.
Even worse are the people who claiming they'd do the same shit.
Seriously, you cant kill or main people who steal from you.
There's no justifying her actions.
It's a freaking purse. Sometimes, you just have to take that loss.
Holy shit! He should've ran faster and to the side.
Didn't he watch Prometheus?
Gross. No victim should ever just have to 'take that loss.'
The law -- save for Texas at night, apparently -- says they do.
The law says a lot of things.
Hahahaha can't tell if this is serious or not. If it is, then seek help immediately please.
You can't attempt murder because someone stole your wallet/purse/whatever.
Holy cow
I'll repeat, you people defending her are fucking insane. LIKE HOLY FUCKING SHIT, INSANE. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF SHE'S PREGNANT, A WOMAN, OR ANYTHING. NOTHING JUSTIFIES MURDER
I would much rather be on the side of the pregnant woman as opposed to the piece of shit who tried to rob a pregnant woman. Call me insane. I can't feel bad for the guy. He got what he deserved.
Dead fucking serious. I don't know what the fuck people think they're defending in this guy. Yes, defending him. A pregnant woman was robbed, could have been hurt in the process of the initial struggle where he took her purse. She could've gotten hurt even attempting to chase him initially after he grabbed her purse. Just the experience or trauma alone could have been bad for both her and the baby.
So something bad happens to the piece of shit, handled by the exact same person he tried to make his victim. Again, what happened to him is his own fault. You do NOT rob pregnant fucking women. Can I say that again? You do NOT attempt to rob a pregnant woman. Whatever happens to you afterwards? The world is a better place. Take that anyway you want to.
He had it coming. Bad things should happen to everybody who attempts to rob a pregnant woman. The problem many here seem to be having is that it isn't JUST a purse, or JUST a wallet. I really wonder if some here understand how it is some people struggle to get by day to day. She could've had anything of serious importance in there that she couldn't afford to lose right then. If he had stole a decent bit of cash from her, guess what? Nobody is giving it back to her because she's on the right side of the law as the victim. She handled the situation, and I commend her.
Saying she should have let him get a way is basically saying he should get to walk.
Saying she should have let him get a way is basically saying he should get to walk.
No one is defending the guy. They're just not condoning the actions of the woman. That should be obvious.
She should be in jail.
Materials items don't justify attempted murder.
And if you're defending her actions because she was pregnant, you need to gain some perspective.
Would you be so forgiving of this vigilante justice if the person that got run over was someone that you cared about? People make mistakes. Something as trivial as a purse shouldn't cost anyone their life.
The right thing to do would have been to notify the authorities and let them take care of it. You know it.
Defending this is as insane as defending the girl that struck the preacher with a baseball ball bat from behind because he was saying outrageous shit about rape victims.
Actions have consequences, but those consequences must be proportionate. Running someone down for theft is not a proportionate response. This woman should face the consequences for her actions in that regard.
Tell me then, what were this pregnant lady's other options?
My issue is that there seems to be a little too much outrage over something bad happening to some piece of shit, as opposed to a pregnant woman being robbed. Listen, do you guys realize that often times the pregnant woman in situations like this sometimes doesn't make it out of the encounter alive? That the child sometimes doesn't survive either? I knew a woman 4 months pregnant that was left for dead coming home from work one night. She never got any justice, and many woman like her often suffering the same fate. If he did what he did to this woman in broad daylight, you can only imagine what he might have done to her late at night.
If you found out that that this guy has possibly killed before, would there be similar outrage over him finally paying a price? Come on, man. I know what she did wasn't at its core the right thing to do, but in the situation I absolutely believe she is allowed to fight back and be aggressive in her own right.
Tell me then, what were this pregnant lady's other options?
No, in no situation were her only options "murder or he gets away".
So no one said she should let him walk and you were pulling stuff out of your ass?
Tell me then, what were this pregnant lady's other options?
My issue is that there seems to be a little too much outrage over something bad happening to some piece of shit, as opposed to a pregnant woman being robbed. Listen, do you guys realize that often times the pregnant woman in situations like this sometimes doesn't make it out of the encounter alive? That the child sometimes doesn't survive either? I knew a woman 4 months pregnant that was left for dead coming home from work one night. She never got any justice, and many woman like her often suffering the same fate. If he did what he did to this woman in broad daylight, you can only imagine what he might have done to her late at night.
If you found out that that this guy has possibly killed before, would there be similar outrage over him finally paying a price? Come on, man. I know what she did wasn't at its core the right thing to do, but in the situation I absolutely believe she is allowed to fight back and be aggressive in her own right.
This material items line tells me that maybe some people in here haven't experienced hard times, and don't know what it's like sometimes to be in a situation where you've lost so much already that you can't afford to lose anymore? What some people in here are treating as simple "material items" or a few "credit cards" or "just some cash" could mean the difference between whether any other person in the same situation as this woman was in can't afford to make rent, can't afford to put food on the table. Robbery is a very, very serious fucking thing. It isn't to be taken lightly. Many times in a robbery the victim is killed in the process of being robbed. How do we know this guy isn't one of those types that got what he deserved?
Tell me then, what were this pregnant lady's other options?
No, she took the other option of run the fucker over and was successful.
She didn't murder the guy.
Good for her.
And your argument has no merit because you're imagining an entirely different situation to what occurred.
Were she in immediate danger she wouldn't have been able to jump in her car anyway.
And then you make up other crimes you imagine he might have committed to try and justify attempt homicide.
None of the nonsense you just suggested occured.
For fuck sake. What is with people on Gaf picking the stupidest things to dig their feet into the ground over? "Oh, what if he'd killed someone." I mean... you can't add your own backstory here to justify this shit, this isn't a TV show.
.
No one in this thread is defending him. All we're saying is that theft DOES NOT justify attempted murder.Dead fucking serious. I don't know what the fuck people think they're defending in this guy. Yes, defending him. A pregnant woman was robbed, could have been hurt in the process of the initial struggle where he took her purse. She could've gotten hurt even attempting to chase him initially after he grabbed her purse. Just the experience or trauma alone could have been bad for both her and the baby.
So something bad happens to the piece of shit, handled by the exact same person he tried to make his victim. Again, what happened to him is his own fault. You do NOT rob pregnant fucking women. Can I say that again? You do NOT attempt to rob a pregnant woman. Whatever happens to you afterwards? The world is a better place. Take that anyway you want to.
He had it coming. Bad things should happen to everybody who attempts to rob a pregnant woman. The problem many here seem to be having is that it isn't JUST a purse, or JUST a wallet. I really wonder if some here understand how it is some people struggle to get by day to day. She could've had anything of serious importance in there that she couldn't afford to lose right then. If he had stole a decent bit of cash from her, guess what? Nobody is giving it back to her because she's on the right side of the law as the victim. She handled the situation, and I commend her.
A person willing to rob a pregnant woman isn't too far a stone throw away from killing that pregnant woman assuming she was able to resist him to such a degree that he couldn't more easily grab her purse.
The woman is a hero in my book.
Call the police.
Gosh. If only there were some short number one could use for situations like this.
Its only three digits and it's on the tip of my tongue... Hmm...
Nah, you're right, this is a tough one.
Well, yes and no. She should call the police.So you are saying she should let him walk.
So you are saying she should let him walk.
If the options are letting someone get away with a purse or using potentially lethal force to retrieve it from someone posing no threat to you, you actually don't have an option. Not in any civilized country.
It's a freaking purse. Sometimes, you just have to take that loss.
Some of you are dense on purpose. You don't run someone over and have it not be attempted homicide. Which the police agreed, because she is now being charged for assault with a deadly weapon.
A person willing to rob a pregnant woman isn't too far a stone throw away from killing that pregnant woman assuming she was able to resist him to such a degree that he couldn't more easily grab her purse.
The woman is a hero in my book.
So you are saying she should let him walk.
Calling the police equals letting him walk? Is English your first language?