Or a ship named 'Prometheus' smashing into its creator, in an attempt to kill its maker, was symbolic.
They're only human. What's her name gets squished for the same reason. :lol
A prequel in a way that it happens before the other Alien movies and is set in the same universe.
A prequel it is not in a way, that everything happening in it sets up the previous movies. This is what people want and are angry for not getting.
A prequel in a way that it happens before the other Alien movies and is set in the same universe.
A prequel it is not in a way, that everything happening in it sets up the previous movies. This is what people want and are angry for not getting.
IT WAS SO OBVIOUS I JUST NEVER MENTIONED IT TO YOUUUUU
You know what? The more we talk about the movie the more I like it, and the more I want to go back sooner than I had planned.
Terrible character writing be damned (and holy shit was it bad for the most part), it's the most interesting film I've seen in ages.
What? No. I'm angry BECAUSE it was an Alien film at all. It could have been so much better without any of the alien baggage attached to it. It doesn't just have 'Alien DNA' like Scott was saying. It's a goddamn Alien film through and through.
I dunno. It definately has a place with Alien, but for me it felt like a different take on the Alien mythos. Maybe it was the not-so-cast-driven narration or the much less focused plot.
Heh sounds exactly like Alien and Blade Runner really. People from 20 years from now will see Prometheus as an absolute classic and the haters will be internet-skullfucked by a descendant of Scullibundo
I dunno. It definately has a place with Alien, but for me it felt like a different take on the Alien mythos. Maybe it was the not-so-cast-driven narration or the much less focused plot.
A woman fails to mention to anyone that the medpod just extracted a god damned monster from her womb.
It has been a fun evening of theorizing and hypothesizing about the film, but I'm not sure if I can bring myself go much further. The fact that the basic plotting and story outline of the movie is such a fucking mess that I'm not sure that it is worth discussing the overarching mythology. A geologist gets lost in a cave of rocks, even though he clearly has a way to map out the structure and a radio communications link to the mothership that is constantly tracking his position. A biologist thinks it's a good idea to touch and confront a brand new species of alien, without knowing a god damned thing about it. A woman fails to mention to anyone that the medpod just extracted a god damned monster from her womb.
So little effort was put into the surface plot of the film, why should I believe that there is some complex well-constructed overarching mythology behind it? Yes, there are a lot of religious, mythological, and philosophical references. Just because you can load a movie down with references like that doesn't mean there is a cogent vision behind it.
To me, it's like the difference between a David Lynch film with a strange, flexible but understandable narrative (Blue Velvet, Twin Peaks) and a David Lynch film where he's just throwing weird shit at the wall and hoping something sticks (Lost Highway, Inland Empire). Can you look at all the shit thrown on the wall in Prometheus and come up with some half-baked, half-satisfying explanation for it all? Maybe, but at the same time you still have the sense that the film's creator just expects you to assemble all his intentional nonsense in a way that makes sense. To me it seems like the film and its events are left open to interpretation only because of incompetence and incoherence at the script level, not because they intended to create something that would naturally and organically have multiple interpretations.
Because it's Ridley Scott I feel like people want to read a lot more into it than is there. If this were some muddled straight-to-DVD flick without the Hollywood actors or big production values, you would just dismiss it as ambitious-but-sophomoric mediocrity and not give it a second thought.
Also the zombie geologist guy was so bad.
It has been a fun evening of theorizing and hypothesizing about the film, but I'm not sure if I can bring myself go much further. The fact that the basic plotting and story outline of the movie is such a fucking mess that I'm not sure that it is worth discussing the overarching mythology. A geologist gets lost in a cave of rocks, even though he clearly has a way to map out the structure and a radio communications link to the mothership that is constantly tracking his position. A biologist thinks it's a good idea to touch and confront a brand new species of alien, without knowing a god damned thing about it. A woman fails to mention to anyone that the medpod just extracted a god damned monster from her womb.
So little effort was put into the surface plot of the film, why should I believe that there is some complex well-constructed overarching mythology behind it? Yes, there are a lot of religious, mythological, and philosophical references. Just because you can load a movie down with references like that doesn't mean there is a cogent vision behind it.
To me, it's like the difference between a David Lynch film with a strange, flexible but understandable narrative (Blue Velvet, Twin Peaks) and a David Lynch film where he's just throwing weird shit at the wall and hoping something sticks (Lost Highway, Inland Empire). Can you look at all the shit thrown on the wall in Prometheus and come up with some half-baked, half-satisfying explanation for it all? Maybe, but at the same time you still have the sense that the film's creator just expects you to assemble all his intentional nonsense in a way that makes sense.
Because it's Ridley Scott I feel like people want to read a lot more into it than is there. If this were some muddled straight-to-DVD flick without the Hollywood actors or big production values, you would just dismiss it as ambitious-but-sophomoric mediocrity and not give it a second thought.
What? No. I'm angry BECAUSE it was an Alien film at all. It could have been so much better without any of the alien baggage attached to it. It doesn't just have 'Alien DNA' like Scott was saying. It's a goddamn Alien film through and through.
So she doesn't bother to tell the captain anything about the alien being she extracted from herself? k.I see this thrown around all the time. Shaw was terrified of the company and anyone associated with it after she learned that she was pregneant and that they wanted her frozen and brought back to earth. She and the Cap'n shared the opinion, that nothing from that rock should ever return to earth.
So she doesn't bother to tell the captain anything about the alien being she extracted from herself? k.
I hate antagonism for conflict sake. Conflict can arise out of the plot without following the worst writing cliche ever of having characters already suspicious of one another. Again and again I'm reminded of just how fucking good the script for Sunshine is in how the characters are drawn.
Not to mention the two people she beat up before running from them--they're terrified of contamination and yet they don't alert anyone in a contained ship that there's a potential contamination vector giving birth in the fucking medbay?
Hehe, I see where your coming from. But as the characters found out, the more answers you receive, the more questions you will come up with. So in the end one believes what he chooses to believe. You think it sucked, I think it was very good and thought provoking. I might be reading you wrong, but are you saying you want a film where everything is spelled out for you and nothing left to your interpretation? Because if so, David Lynch was the worst example you could have come up with. All his movies are left to interpretation.
This, exactly.It has been a fun evening of theorizing and hypothesizing about the film, but I'm not sure if I can bring myself go much further. The fact that the basic plotting and story outline of the movie is such a fucking mess means that I'm not sure that it is worth discussing the overarching mythology, symbolism, etc. A geologist gets lost in a cave of rocks, even though he clearly has a way to map out the structure and a radio communications link to the mothership that is constantly tracking his position. A biologist thinks it's a good idea to touch and confront a brand new species of alien, without knowing a god damned thing about it. A woman fails to mention to anyone that the medpod just extracted a god damned monster from her womb.
So little effort was put into the surface plot of the film, why should I believe that there is some complex well-constructed overarching mythology behind it? Yes, there are a lot of religious, mythological, and philosophical references. Just because you can load a movie down with references like that doesn't mean there is a cogent vision behind it.
I don't even know how you got that from that post.I might be reading you wrong, but are you saying you want a film where everything is spelled out for you and nothing left to your interpretation?
This, exactly.
And when the references are as juvenile or gratuitous as "it's Christmas!" (Jesus was totally born on that day, you guys!) or "oooh, they're washing Weyland's feet!", really...
The black good must inhibit people's ability to talk about things, because Holloway did the exact same thing. I was so annoyed when he saw the stuff in his eye and didn't instantly panic and tell Shaw. Manufactured drama for the sake of plot.
Regardless of whether they know about the alien fetus, a potentially contaminated women just went berserk on two of her crewmates before engaging the medbay. Don't they have cameras? What did the other two do? Why was there no one following up on her?They probably didn't know about the alien fetus. It's not like David made a special announcement about it to everyone.
How was it not gratuitous, then?That isn't gratuitous.
Even supposing that's true, what would that have to do with anything?As shown by Prometheus threads there's like 1% of the posters who noticed these references right away.
Regardless of whether they know about the alien fetus, a potentially contaminated women just went berserk on two of her crewmates before engaging the medbay. Don't they have cameras? What did the other two do? Why was there no one following up on her?
How was it not gratuitous, then?
Even supposing that's true, what would that have to do with anything?
I don't think you're expected to know evolution works.Here's another thing that bothers me. The Engineers created life on Earth, right? Then how come humans have identical DNA to the Engineers while animals don't?
Or were the animals already there, and the Engineers created humans specifically? And if so, what does that say about other primates having very similar genetic structures to us?
I don't think you're expected to know evolution works.
Besides, it's just a theory! You can just choose to believe something else happened!
Lol, I don't think this movie expects us to know much of anything... Except for Greek and Christian myths, of course.I don't think you're expected to know evolution works.
Besides, it's just a theory! You can just choose to believe something else happened!
the music is almost constantly at odds with what's going on in the movie,
As best I can make sense of things, the moon was sort of test. If one of the alien's creations went from worshipping them as gods to striving to be gods themselves, they would be unmade before they could ever pose a threat to the creator. The living alien was a volunteer kamikaze pilot kept in hyper sleep awaiting the first life forms to pass that man-god threshold test or something?
Bad editing, mostly.I cringed when I saw that some of the music was done by Harry-Gregson Williams. What happened?
"It's about ancient aliens creating life on Earth, so it's entirely appropriate and relevant to set the action on Christmas and zoom in on old man Weyland's feet being washed!"It was in line with the themes of the movie clearly.
I was talking about how gratuitous it was, and you replied "well, a lot of people didn't notice it!" Kinda beside the point.People insisting that the symbolism in this movie is cheap and stuffed down your throat?
Nope? Especially considering this movie considers itself "hard scifi" (holy shit).Well the details will always be scientificly inaccurate in these kind of movies no?
I chalked that up to a contamination leak. The bio weapon goo leaked, infected someone or something, and set off a panic.Not really. Shit went wrong at the dome and he was sleeping cuz that was the only way to protect himself from the attackers.
I cringed when I saw that some of the music was done by Harry-Gregson Williams. What happened?
(Idris Elba showing why he is a BOSS yet again)
Sorry, but he was barely given anything interesting to do.
"It's about ancient aliens creating life on Earth, so it's entirely appropriate and relevant to set the action on Christmas and zoom in on old man Weyland's feet being washed!"
How sophomoric/shallow can you get with the religious references?
I was talking about how gratuitous it was, and you replied "well, a lot of people didn't notice it!" Kinda beside the point.
Nope? Especially considering this movie considers itself "hard scifi" (holy shit).
And considering we're talking about evolution, here. Really, in this day and age... I mean, it's not string theory or rocket science.
Well, he was there, on screen, and being Idris Elba, that's all he needed to do to be badass.
It's kind of insulting, though. He can do far more.
The most absurd thing is some people saying this is a slow burner movie and my first thought is "did we watch the same movie? what the fuck are you talking about?"