I really don't know why more poeple don't listen to GT Live. Those guys stick to gaming for the entire hour plus, with only side interjections when it comes up organically throughout the conversations.
Because, for what seems like a majority of folks, an hour of straight game or industry talk is boring as hell. If I wanted a news cast I'd watch or listen to a news cast.
Podcasts are supposed to be more like radio, and radio has personality. You spend time each day or week listening/watching these people and it gets dreadfully dull if all they do is stick on point all the time.
Even Podcasters like Jose Otero who try to stick to subject matter religiously stray and let personal stories and interjection in, and guess what those are usually his best podcasts.
Granted I get that Greg and Colin went a little trolly this week, but honestly what they are trying to communicate is that if you don't want rambling or personal conversation then maybe this podcast isn't for you. Could they handle it better? Yes. Should they add timestamps? Probably.
Granted I only started listening two weeks ago, but I loved the whole schtick. It was entertaining, I felt like I was just listening to some friends bs about stuff and games. It lent an air of comfort to it.
It's why I stopped listening to DLC which is like all gaming and only gaming. Jeff is a good host, but it's dull to listen to him talk about games all the time, and the only reason I know about Spicer is thanks to uninformed opinions.
Hell, look at the Cagcast, on of the most popular logest running podcasts, and they rarely talk games. There's a good reason for that, and its the personality of the people attached to it.
TLDR
This has been covered in other threads, but the reason a lot of folks don't listen to more gaming focused podcasts is because just gaming talk all the time isn't actually entertaining or enjoyable. You have to have personal interjection and personality interjected in to it to make it relatable. Otherwise its like watching/listening to the weekly/nightly news.
But knowing that there is a subset of the market that wants to skip that, timestamps are really the easiest way to please everyone.
Also for those complaining that they aren't listening to criticism or the people who pay them, I don't think you understand how this works. These guys aren't at the beck and call of their supporters. Patreon is a service used to patronize creators and artists so that they can continue to do the work you enjoy.
It is not a commission service. If supporters don't like the work being created stop supporting. That is the only criticism that is valid. You can tell them with your money that it isn't working. If enough people do so they will change.
Finally don't conflate fan requests with constructive criticism. Those are rarely the same thing. Saying, "hey I think sometimes you guys get off topic a little too much and that drifting and rambling tends to water down the product or make it less interesting to me" is a whole helluva lot different from saying "I want you to stop doing sports stories/rambling/personal stuff! You should stick to gaming only because I paid you." Not the same thing, and again patreon is not commissioning.