A Black Falcon
Member
Japan can call turn-based tactical strategy games "RPGs" all they want, but people who do will continue to be wrong. There's a reason why the "SRPG" genre is listed as strategy games on sites like GameFAQs -- they are strategy games first, RPG second. The strategy and RPG genres are related, as both come from the same roots (both developed out of wargames), but ARE different, and it's not that hard to tell which genre games are in.Normally turn based tactics games are known as tactical RPGs (or sometimes strategy RPGs) which are at this point a pretty well established sub-genre of RPGs.
I will give that the Growlanser games are probably RPGs, and I likely should have removed them, but not anything else on that list. Growlanser II and III are strategic, but are RPGs. All other titles on the list are not, and in that I agree with GameFAQs -- other than Growlanser, nothing else on that list is an RPG by their standards, and it isn't by mine either.
Regardless of what you think of tactical strategy games, Koei grand strategy games like PTO, Nobunaga's Ambition, and Romance of the Three Kingdoms are in absolutely no way RPGs. They are strategy games, bordering on simulation perhaps. And yeah, Harvest Moon and co. are simulation games. The Rune Factory games are sim/RPG hybrids, but not Harvest Moon.Almost everything you listed as not RPGs fall into that category. Harvest Moon type games are different and maybe they're considered pure simulations rather than RPG-lite.
Of the others, Sakura Wars is an adventure/strategy hybrid; no RPG there. GrimGrimoire is a side-view RTS. Heroes of Might & Magic is a turn-based strategy game franchise; yes it has some RPG elements, but having RPG elements doesn't make a strategy game an RPG! And Future Tactics and Gladius are strategy games.

