PS4K information (~2x GPU power w/ clock+, new CPU, price, tent. Q1 2017)

How frustrated will everyone in this threw be after E3 comes and goes and we still don't hear anything else about this thing ? In order to avoid tanking sales at all , it's not likely a ps4K gets announced until PSX in December. So does that mean this thread will continue floating around until next fall ?
No, this will probably be closed soon. Its getting too large and will start to become an annoyance to the servers.

There will probably be more news coming between now and E3 though.
 
I'm surprised Sony is not shipping this until after Christmas, in Q1 2017.
You'd think they'd want to have this for holiday spending season.
There's no way they'd announce this until after Christmas then because it would jeopardize OG PS4 sales.
Lol.. Okay
I must have missed all the news sites reporting the rele,. Wait no I didn't. Not confirmed anywhere
 
I'm surprised Sony is not shipping this until after Christmas, in Q1 2017.
You'd think they'd want to have this for holiday spending season.
There's no way they'd announce this until after Christmas then because it would jeopardize OG PS4 sales.

They also have PSVR to promote.
And they know that many people would give precedence to a redesign to play games better compared to a VR headset.

Still this is just a rumor, there is enough evidence to say that a PS4 redesign/upgrade is in the works but the details like specs, price and release date are still to be considered a rumor in my opinion.
The fact that they're still deciding about upgrading CPU and that upgrade would add 100$ to the price doesn't make sense on a technical level for example, but this is from a retailer meeting.
 
They will probably have a huge reveal similar to ps4. Its own showcase focused simply on ps4k. They wont suck the air out of the room at e3 only to show upcoming games looking stale in comparison to what the ps4k can do.


Next year, everything at e3 will be ps4k stage demons as the new standard.


My guess?

E3 2016 same old but with nx reveal.

Once nx reveal is done and release date known, sony and MS will reveal closer to NX launch to steal momentum.

E3 2017 only ps4k stage demos. Ps4 wont be showcased only random comparison videos from the devs here and there
 
Why would it break bc?

Zen has SMT so a quad core zen can run 8 threads and the software would never know the difference.

I agree with the person you quoted, a quad core zen would be way more powerful than an 8 core puma.

That's exactly what I would expect if it is a major spec upgrade.

I would imagine that whatever they do for both the CPU/GPU could easily switch to a standard PS4 mode that's virtually identical to the software for games not updated to take advantage of the 4k.
 
Going from 8 physical cores to 4 physical cores could potentially break BC...

Btw, is Zen such a power hog?

8 Jaguar cores @ 1.6 GHz consume 30 watts at 28nm lithography. How many watts would an 8-core Zen @ 14nm need?

SneakyStephan covered what I think/believe but I could very well be wrong.

Zen I think I read will top out at 95W TDP for the top end i7 like part so a 3.0-4.0 Ghz 8 core?

A pure guess on my part would be that a semi-custom 4 core version at say 2.0 Ghz could come in at around the 30 watts you quote for Jaguar?
 
So, has anybody fiugred out how this rumor could possibly be true based on what Eurogamer said about it only being in the prototype stage? Or is it likely just that there's a super-strict NDA?

Also, everyone is sure of a $500 price point now? That's pretty dumb. Has any console ever really done well at $500?
 
They will probably have a huge reveal similar to ps4. Its own showcase focused simply on ps4k. They wont suck the air out of the room at e3 only to show upcoming games looking stale in comparison to what the ps4k can do.


Next year, everything at e3 will be ps4k stage demons as the new standard.


My guess?

E3 2016 same old but with nx reveal.

Once nx reveal is done and release date known, sony and MS will reveal closer to NX launch to steal momentum.

E3 2017 only ps4k stage demos. Ps4 wont be showcased only random comparison videos from the devs here and there

The games will look mostly the same besides resolution.
 
So, has anybody fiugred out how this rumor could possibly be true based on what Eurogamer said about it only being in the prototype stage? Or is it likely just that there's a super-strict NDA?

Also, everyone is sure of a $500 price point now? That's pretty dumb. Has any console ever really done well at $500?

My worry is that Sony went fishing for leaks and hooked OsirisBlack...

Not heard a peep from him for a week!
 
My soul would be super cheesed.

Having just sold my PS4 (found a buyer who was willing to pay a stupidly high amount) in anticipation for PS4K, I want a tsunami of news about this thing at E3.
Even if PS4K project exists, Sony won't announce this thing at E3 — too soon. PGW more likely.
 
So i just talked to my brother. He's been waiting for u4 to buy a ps4 but now that he heard about the rumors he doesn't know what to do... I guess he'll have to wait for e3.

Worst timing ever.
 
Who knows what he was trying to mean by that but he's neither of them so whatevs

Ah, okay. Hence why I didn't say it.

__________________

So i just talked to my brother. He's been waiting for u4 to buy a ps4 but now that he heard about the rumors he doesn't know what to do... I guess he'll have to wait for e3.

Worst timing ever.

Yeah, definitely a tough spot. Well, at least he'll be able to get Uncharted 4 for less than $60 if he does wait until after E3.
 
Whilst you are around Osiris, have you heard anything about NX considering it should launch in November/December this year when PS4K might not launch until Q1 17'?
 
Whilst you are around Osiris, have you heard anything about NX considering it should launch in November/December this year when PS4K might not launch until Q1 17'?
Only things that have already been posted in other threads here. I'm really more excited to see what Nintendo does especially how they handle the Zelda game.
 
Only things that have already been posted in other threads here. I'm really more excited to see what Nintendo does especially how they handle the Zelda game.

Damn Nintendo and their secrecy until the last possible minute! I'm just glad Sony doesn't seem to mind sharing info early.

Thanks for answering.
 
I'm really having trouble understanding how Sony can release a PS4.5 without splitting the user-base. While I'd like a PS4k, it seems to me like a PS4 slim is more likely. Except, a slim won't really benefit the PSVR...

If the user-base is in fact split, can developers accommodate for such a phenomenon? In other words, would developers be able to efficiently optimize their games on both the PS4 and the potential PS4K?
 
I'm really having trouble understanding how Sony can release a PS4.5 without splitting the user-base. While I'd like a PS4k, it seems to me like a PS4 slim is more likely. Except, a slim won't really benefit the PSVR...

If the user-base is in fact split, can developers accommodate for such a phenomenon? In other words, would developers be able to efficiently optimize their games on both the PS4 and the potential PS4K?

That's the $64,000 question. How will Sony handle this and explain it to the masses. It is by far the toughest thing to deal with I would think.
 
I'm really having trouble understanding how Sony can release a PS4.5 without splitting the user-base. While I'd like a PS4k, it seems to me like a PS4 slim is more likely. Except, a slim won't really benefit the PSVR...

If the user-base is in fact split, can developers accommodate for such a phenomenon? In other words, would developers be able to efficiently optimize their games on both the PS4 and the potential PS4K?

why would they bother
 
I'm really having trouble understanding how Sony can release a PS4.5 without splitting the user-base. While I'd like a PS4k, it seems to me like a PS4 slim is more likely. Except, a slim won't really benefit the PSVR...

If the user-base is in fact split, can developers accommodate for such a phenomenon? In other words, would developers be able to efficiently optimize their games on both the PS4 and the potential PS4K?

It's gonna be AMD x86 and GCN/Polaris just like PS4. It will likely run the same code as PS4, so no it is not inevitable that the user base will be split. Developers will more than likely continue to target PS4 and port upwards. People are really overstating the complexity of this.
 
I'm really having trouble understanding how Sony can release a PS4.5 without splitting the user-base. While I'd like a PS4k, it seems to me like a PS4 slim is more likely. Except, a slim won't really benefit the PSVR...

If the user-base is in fact split, can developers accommodate for such a phenomenon? In other words, would developers be able to efficiently optimize their games on both the PS4 and the potential PS4K?

Assuming the PS4 and PS4k use the same architecture, optimizing for one and optimizing for the other is the same thing in 99% of the cases.
 
Why would you release a new version of your console right after a holiday season, potentially burning and pissing off millions of new customers that just got a PS4 for Christmas?
 
It's gonna be AMD x86 and GCN/Polaris just like PS4. It will likely run the same code as PS4, so no it is not inevitable that the user base will be split. Developers will more than likely continue to target PS4 and port upwards. People are really overstating the complexity of this.

Makes sense to me. But then why all the potential pushback from developers?


Assuming the PS4 and PS4k use the same architecture, optimizing for one and optimizing for the other is the same thing in 99% of the cases.

I would hope this is the case. Then the PS4K would make sense. Developers can target for the more popular PS4, and then do their best to optimize for the PS4K.
 
Makes sense to me. But then why all the potential pushback from developers?
The way I see it is, that developers are worried about the ps4 code not just running right off the bat smoothly on the ps4k. Even if all the hardware in the system is superior, different components could lead to different results for whatever reason. So even if they choose to not come out with a patch to optimize/take advantage of the ps4k hardware, they still need to do separate additional testing to make sure the game runs fine on ps4k even if it runs fine on a regular ps4.

And then there's the whole aspect of being left behind, other companies/competitors spending time and resources to make their games look & run even better on ps4k, which could force their hands at spending more money themselves, while not necessarily seeing returns in additional sales, but rather to maintain the status quo.

Basically they'd be spending more time & resources without getting much back in return.
 
Or has anyone even bothered to consider digital foundry's analysis on this rumor?

I was just about to mention that. They're very reputable, with well/high placed sources. They made it very clear this thing is in the proto phase, with dev kits nowhere near being sent out and high-ranking Sony officials unaware of any of this. This directly contradicts what Osiris has posted: and falls more in line with what Gopher hinted at. THAT is what bears discussion IMO.
 
My soul would be super cheesed.

Having just sold my PS4 (found a buyer who was willing to pay a stupidly high amount) in anticipation for PS4K, I want a tsunami of news about this thing at E3.

Might have jumped the gun a little bit there.
We'll see how it pans out for you. Hopefully well.
 
It'll be the publisher's choice, and first party studios will be forced to directly target the new PS4.

Perhaps. But the option to choose would still be present.

Publishers would still choose if they want to put developers through that. Some may force it on developers, some may not.
 
Makes sense to me. But then why all the potential pushback from developers?




I would hope this is the case. Then the PS4K would make sense. Developers can target for the more popular PS4, and then do their best to optimize for the PS4K.
I don't think alot of developers know the specs in detail. There's alot of different ways this can be handled, I think most developers are fearing the worse case scenario.
 
My soul would be super cheesed.

Having just sold my PS4 (found a buyer who was willing to pay a stupidly high amount) in anticipation for PS4K, I want a tsunami of news about this thing at E3.

You sold your PS4 in anticipation of a rumored console that's not coming for at least 9 months, if it even actually happens. Uh... okay. That better have been near full price.
 
I'm really having trouble understanding how Sony can release a PS4.5 without splitting the user-base. While I'd like a PS4k, it seems to me like a PS4 slim is more likely. Except, a slim won't really benefit the PSVR...

If the user-base is in fact split, can developers accommodate for such a phenomenon? In other words, would developers be able to efficiently optimize their games on both the PS4 and the potential PS4K?

What if they just forbid developers to release PS4k-only games and to focus on PS4 as main platform? That would be stupid not to do...
 
What if they just forbid developers to release PS4k-only games and to focus on PS4 as main platform? That would be stupid not to do...

Then why even release the 4K ....

If the PS4 stays main platform nobody needs the PS4K

If the PS4K is the main platform every PS4 owner is pissed off.

It´s just bad no matter how you look at it.
 
You sold your PS4 in anticipation of a rumored console that's not coming for at least 9 months, if it even actually happens. Uh... okay. That better have been near full price.

If he doesn't plan on playing anything on the PS4 until the thing comes out, it isn't a terrible idea.
 
Top Bottom