perineumlick said:
And none of those games have as much immersion breaking texture streaming as Rage. It will vary from person to person; some won't mind it and some will. I just found it illusion breaking, especially with how detailed the game world is. 60fps will be enough for some to claim it best looking game ever, I guess. It does add to it's look.
each of those games do things better than Rage, and worse than Rage. if a ten means technical perfection, what is that? is it 30 fps? that's a rhetorical question of course. i don't think you can come up with a set of rules and say 'if it has X it can't get a ten for graphics'.
'graphics' include the art and the technology. i see no reason why a game with texture pop can't get a ten... unless we go on that whole notion of 'everything starts with a ten and every flaw is subtracted from that'.
that notion is even crazier than giving a numerical score out of ten to everything that goes into getting graphics on screen.
few games have impressed me this gen as much as Halo 3. people look at me like i'm mad whenever i say it, but the lighting in that game is unsurpassed and i'm a sucker for lighting. for me it more than made up for the lack of AA and the hit the IQ took by scaling up the game from a lower resolution.
but then Mirrors Edge is absolutely gorgeous, and it too has pre baked lighting... so you know what, both can be done well.