Sure the story is...whatever? Look, man. I only need to know one thing: where they are.
I've been thinking about this whole thing: what was Borderlands about?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=IshTqobuxQU
Have fun!

Sure the story is...whatever? Look, man. I only need to know one thing: where they are.
I've been thinking about this whole thing: what was Borderlands about?
DeeJ on 404Architect.
![]()
I'm confused on why everyone here is so confused.
Chances are the game is gutted so bad because DLC
If you look at the original leaked contract here:
http://documents.latimes.com/bungie-activision-contract/
Destiny was supposed to come out in 2013, so it looks like it was already delayed one year.
Section 11.4 shows every quarter the game is delayed Bungie's royalty gets reduced by 10% (2% of 20% etc.). So does that mean a 4 quarter delay (1 year) = Bungie's royalty got cut by 40%? No wonder they shipped the product then in the current state. Am I reading the legalese right?
There is also a bunch of legalese about 33% of "key members" leaving, which would be "Critical Risk", and could lead to a potential "material breach". Was Joseph Stanton a key member?
It sure sounds like the way the contract was worded, Bungie development was way behind and they just had to ship because it risked losing more and more of their Destiny royalties if they did not. Am I right or wrong in this interpretation? Please some lawyer read this.
No need for a lawyer. What you said sounds about right. Bungie delayed the game and didn't anticipate key members leaving during the delay so they shit the bed and cut content and released what they had. Now what they can salvage will be in the expansion passes.
It's actually kinda hilarious how the beta turned out to be more well received than the actual game. The beta made people who didn't care about the game into day one buyers. Then the game comes out and all the good will just evaporates.
The beta was a great indicator for the actual game. anyone who paid attention, could have known what to expect in the full game ...
Egos had to play a significant part in this. Bungie has never been regarded as a well oiled machine but Activision has had frankenstudios churning out COD for well over a decade now albeit with lukewarm critical but phenomenal monetary success.
Bungie was an artisan shop with dreams of world domination. Now, steeped in self loathing for selling its soul to MS, compounded ten fold now with this AV contract.
Wipe your tears with hundid dolla bills Bungie, but take a good look at yourselves. Bigger, fatter and a shell of the studio you once were. Best wishes to Joe.
Joe, Marty, and others leaving or getting fired for sure leads to ego's clashing and creative differences over at Bungie.
oh i loved the beta. I just didn't expect the beta to literally be a 4th of the game and an exact template for the other 3/4ths.
Someone needs to crack open the game files and see if they can find any content like voice work that doesn't appear in the game, or more locations, cutscenes etc.
This is getting very interesting! If what 404 has said is true then everything fits into place perfectly.
If it a load of crap, then it's even more depressing realising Bungie thought it was OK to deliver the mess of a story we got, among other things!
Bungie already replied and said we're being trolled by 404. There was never a reason to believe that guy anyway.
Who else left besides those two?
Bungie already replied and said we're being trolled by 404. There was never a reason to believe that guy anyway.
Then the second reality is worse. The first gives them an excuse, the second there isn't.
Bungie already replied and said we're being trolled by 404. There was never a reason to believe that guy anyway.
Exactly this.
Final fantasy 14 was a completely different situation though. They had no 10 year plan other than trying to get people to subscribe for as long as possible. Bungie and activision have a set plan to keep making sequels and dlc. FF14 had to make the best out of what they had so it wasn't a complete financial diaster. Plus Destiny has already sold better than many games so after being out for a year. So it's not like they are hurting from no profits.
Bungie already replied and said we're being trolled by 404. There was never a reason to believe that guy anyway.
If you look at the original leaked contract here:
http://documents.latimes.com/bungie-activision-contract/
Destiny was supposed to come out in 2013, so it looks like it was already delayed one year.
Section 11.4 shows every quarter the game is delayed Bungie's royalty gets reduced by 10% (2% of 20% etc.). So does that mean a 4 quarter delay (1 year) = Bungie's royalty got cut by 40%? No wonder they shipped the product then in the current state. Am I reading the legalese right?
There is also a bunch of legalese about 33% of "key members" leaving, which would be "Critical Risk", and could lead to a potential "material breach". Was Joseph Stanton a key member?
It sure sounds like the way the contract was worded, Bungie development was way behind and they just had to ship because it risked losing more and more of their Destiny royalties if they did not. Am I right or wrong in this interpretation? Please some lawyer read this.
Bungie already replied and said we're being trolled by 404. There was never a reason to believe that guy anyway.
How are people making this leap from "404 isn't actually an insider" to "Bungie intentionally did things poorly"?So the story was intentionally missing/bad and the lack of variety in missions is on purpose?! That's even worse really. Either way it sucks, Destiny could have been so much better.
The next game might as well be a reboot cause the only thing we really did in this game was reawaken the Traveler. That's it.
At this point though how many people from Destiny 1 are gonna buy the sequel? Especially if they leave the first one the way it is.
People buy call of duty yearly.
Wait, we did?
Did I totally miss this?
Also this thread really needs just some sort of proof. I'm having a hard time making these major leaps. Yeah the story was terrible, but bungie has definitely been hit or miss with story telling since EVER.
That's not necessarily the same thing as "awakening" it.Yup. Once you kill the black things the Speaker says the traveler has begun to heal again.
Thing is, I doubt it was originally a good story, or they would have stuck with it.
I'd bet it was a clunky exposition-laden impenetrable snore-fest of lore with little interest in terms of actual character. Then they panicked and try to cut down the boring cutscenes and shift the lore to an optional setting, and ended up with nothing but the bones of a story.
If Deej is correct in this being troll, the unfortunate alternative would be that the story was intended to be the shit story we got.
Not sure I'd want to take ownership of this shit story.
That's not necessarily the same thing as "awakening" it.
Yup. Once you kill the black things the Speaker says the traveler has begun to heal again.
We don't have a clear picture of how the Traveler works, or what "awakening" it would even mean. And "begun to heal" doesn't exactly imply that it's suddenly doing anything new.it's basically the same thing.
This is Destiny we're talking about, it hardly has punchy events with immediately wide-reaching impact. And the game itself doesn't even present it like an instant massive change to how the Traveler behaves; the end cutscene basically just says "we're becoming more powerful, go to kill some shit in strike missions."i'm pretty sure it's going to play a bigger part in the next game and the only reason they said it was healing was to give a reason to not do anything with it.
Even if the original story was bad, it can't be worse than cutting it out completely and leaving the barebones for us.
We don't have a clear picture of how the Traveler works, or what "awakening" it would even mean.
This is Destiny we're talking about, it hardly has punchy events with immediately wide-reaching impact. And the game itself doesn't even present it like an instant massive change to how the Traveler behaves; the end cutscene basically just says "we're becoming more powerful, go to kill some shit in strike missions."
I disagree, I've seen many games where the story is horrible but the game doesn't have the self awareness to just shut up and let you get back to the much more enjoyable action. MGS4 anyone?
Wait, we did?
Did I totally miss this?
Also this thread really needs just some sort of proof. I'm having a hard time making these major leaps. Yeah the story was terrible, but bungie has definitely been hit or miss with story telling since EVER.
People buy call of duty yearly.
I was going to just copy paste what I wrote in the Bungie thread but since it got deleted I'll just make a tldrw version.
1) The cut-scene with Crow isn't in the game at all and even if it was cut out there's no logical place where it could be except for the supposed 2013 story where he was part of a splinter group.
2) Factions and the Vanguard people are literally just vendors. No explanation about who they are and no other interaction other than to trade in marks for equipment.
3) Back in August 2013 Bungie wanted this franchise to go up against Star Wars and TLotR. If the rumors are to be believed this is around 1-4 months before they scrapped the story. Oddly enough, the PR for this game for this year was mostly end-game oriented and how it isn't a MMO and as far as I recall the story was never mentioned again.
4) I REALLY doubt the best mission Bungie could make is "Press square to Dinklebot."
5) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2983582/ Oh hai Crow.
Nothing concrete but you look at all of it and things just don't add up.
I was going to just copy paste what I wrote in the Bungie thread but since it got deleted I'll just make a tldrw version.
1) The cut-scene with Crow isn't in the game at all and even if it was cut out there's no logical place where it could be except for the supposed 2013 story where he was part of a splinter group.
2) Factions and the Vanguard people are literally just vendors. No explanation about who they are and no other interaction other than to trade in marks for equipment.
3) Back in August 2013 Bungie wanted this franchise to go up against Star Wars and TLotR. If the rumors are to be believed this is around 1-4 months before they scrapped the story. Oddly enough, the PR for this game for this year was mostly end-game oriented and how it isn't a MMO and as far as I recall the story was never mentioned again.
4) I REALLY doubt the best mission Bungie could make is "Press square to Dinklebot."
5) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2983582/ Oh hai Crow.
Nothing concrete but you look at all of it and things just don't add up.
I disagree, I've seen many games where the story is horrible but the game doesn't have the self awareness to just shut up and let you get back to the much more enjoyable action. MGS4 anyone?
I disagree, I've seen many games where the story is horrible but the game doesn't have the self awareness to just shut up and let you get back to the much more enjoyable action. MGS4 anyone?
The much more enjoyable action of pressing square/X and defending dinklebot over and over again? I'd rather have a cutscene to be honest lol.
Bungie already replied and said we're being trolled by 404. There was never a reason to believe that guy anyway.
While the story was a putrid mess, the woeful and misbegotten dialogue was something else entirely.
Did these rumored 'cuts' also magically replace supposedly quality / passable lines with the crap that currently passes for dialogue and exposition in Destiny? Or were all the lines recorded or redone after all the cuts?
Destiny is not a mess of a story. It is the absence of a story. They could go anywhere in the next game since there is so little to worry about contradicting. I am surprised that well known TV actors were used when any basement rate SAG member would have gotten the job done.
DeeJ on 404Architect.
![]()
If you look at the original leaked contract here:
http://documents.latimes.com/bungie-activision-contract/
Destiny was supposed to come out in 2013, so it looks like it was already delayed one year.
Section 11.4 shows every quarter the game is delayed Bungie's royalty gets reduced by 10% (2% of 20% etc.). So does that mean a 4 quarter delay (1 year) = Bungie's royalty got cut by 40%? No wonder they shipped the product then in the current state. Am I reading the legalese right?
There is also a bunch of legalese about 33% of "key members" leaving, which would be "Critical Risk", and could lead to a potential "material breach". Was Joseph Stanton a key member?
It sure sounds like the way the contract was worded, Bungie development was way behind and they just had to ship because it risked losing more and more of their Destiny royalties if they did not. Am I right or wrong in this interpretation? Please some lawyer read this.