To be fair to them EviLore is substantially worse than Hitler, the monster literally does not support burning books, Hitler burned books, who would you trust to help you correct history?Lol at these replies
Evilore still living rent free in their minds
ResetEra Discussion -- Stay civil. Don't get personal. Keep it in here.
- Status
M1chl
Currently Gif and Meme Champion
Which is kind of red flag by itself.
OutrageousFacts
Banned
You really can't tell who handed out that ban!
Not taking a side IS taking a side! Fucking tool.
How can bad people like that exist? :/
Coolwhhip
Neophyte
Lots of mountain dew, little sunlight and weak minds that easily follow a herd.
Tuff McNutt
Member
Calling bullshit on this. We all know when Nepenthe is in a car she uses the booster seat which means she can't reach the brakes. Ergo, she couldn't be driving. She is even too short for the bumper cars amusements.
How dare you. She is certainly entitled to driving her shitty Nissan Versa that she got with a 72 month loan at 7%! These people are going to solve the world's economy, but can't realize that they were shafted on a loan. The kicker is that her stepdad is a car salesman and was the one that set up the loan. Even her own family can't stand the angry racist furry midget.
Last edited:
Ionian
Member
You're barking up the wrong tree here, do your homework.
She's still an absolute cunt though, no doubt about that.
Dick Jones
Banned
The following is a statement written in conjunction with my attorney.
"I, Richard Jones of Detroit, Michigan do not condone comments aimed to beLITTLE anyone, including Nepenthe. I will be the BIGger man and apologise. Now is the time to reflect on my actions and GROW as a human. I understand my white privilege of growing past 4 feet has caused resentment to a TINY MINORITY and I am ashamed of my words and deeds.
I would also like to apologise to Slayven for my mean spirited comments about him. Had I known someone could read my comments to him, I would have seriously reconsidered my wording. There will be no further statements.
Thank you.'
NeoIkaruGAF
Gold Member
Upper Management at 343 Industries accused of sexually grooming a 19/20yr old. (See Threadmark)
"The Janitor is not what he seems." Empress Cortana is accusing a well known Halo figure, and Upper Management at 343 Industries, of sexually grooming her at the age of 19/20. She doesn't mention him by name, but I think it's safe to assume who she's talking about: The Janitor. EDIT...www.resetera.com
HAHAHAHAAH that virtual signaling fuck face is a predator.
Its almost like the people that wave the flag the most are the ones that are the most fucked up
Dick Jones
Banned
Stinkles ban is due up any minute now so we all know he can't help himself commenting so this will be fun. Someone get on Stinklewatch 2020.
#Phonepunk#
Banned
Did not realize stinkie was "upper management" so this puts new perspective on it.
jesus how dumb do u have to be to have that high profile a job and talk trash all day on a messageboard?
so by their standards he guilty of dating "a teeenager" also she is autistic also he had quid pro quo with that management position. Perfect storm of shit
jesus how dumb do u have to be to have that high profile a job and talk trash all day on a messageboard?
so by their standards he guilty of dating "a teeenager" also she is autistic also he had quid pro quo with that management position. Perfect storm of shit
#Phonepunk#
Banned
Damn they didn't waste much time shutting this thread down. "Believe women" my ass
Must be nice to be a "valuable member of the community" and that mods will shut down discussion to help you out. Reminds me of all those old stories where a male rapist used their standing in the community to avoid punishment and scrutiny. That community privilege working real good and now Era is helping silence this woman
WeLL DONE YOU FAkE FEMINISTS
Must be nice to be a "valuable member of the community" and that mods will shut down discussion to help you out. Reminds me of all those old stories where a male rapist used their standing in the community to avoid punishment and scrutiny. That community privilege working real good and now Era is helping silence this woman
WeLL DONE YOU FAkE FEMINISTS
Last edited:
Obliviousness to how good life currently is doesn't help. How many of them would agree with the statement "medieval peasants were better off than wage slaves"?
#Phonepunk#
Banned
No surprise they are taking his side still it stinks. They locked the thread and there is one thread mark where a user says the Halo Community knows her and she's crazy lol. Then they say she called them a retard, and wrote some mean tweets, which apparently proves all bets are off and she's a horrible liar.
"Hey this woman made 2 or 3 bad tweets that means she is lying about being sexually manipulated by this powerful man"
these people are so full of shit jfc
"Hey this woman made 2 or 3 bad tweets that means she is lying about being sexually manipulated by this powerful man"
these people are so full of shit jfc
Last edited:
Posting on era be like
jesus I was waiting for the last click to pop out with Nepenthes avatar lmao
nush
Member
Funny how "Being crazy" wasn't a valid reason on Ree to dismiss the woman accusing Neil Degrasse Tyson. In fact to say such a thing was ban worthy.
Seriously, what did he do wrong? Even if you believe the accuser what exactly has she accused him of? Grooming a 19 year old (or a 19ish 20 year old, whatever that means) is intentionally vague and worded just so it can get headlines like "grooming a teenager". Also the stolen ideas thing seems absurd. I mean I like dogs but that doesn't give me rights to every story with a dog in it. If i told GRRM to make a story with a dog in it and he did I wouldn't have claim to that story.
I enjoy schadenfreude as much as anyone, but I also have standards.
I enjoy schadenfreude as much as anyone, but I also have standards.
Last edited:
No one cares about Stinkles, he was making fun of the double standard of resetera of it's bannable to ever doubt the woman's claim even when she turns out to be a liar, But instead of mass bannings like the other threads that turned out to be lies they closed it and shutdown all discussion because he's an "insider" who posts there.
nush
Member
He groomed her sexually. It's just some vague nonsense with no details.
You are right, Phonepunk was the wrong person to reply to so I removed the quote of his post. I have no issue with pointing out Resetera's hypocrisy. I should have found a better post to reply to, but in general I mean that so far I can't see any reason to think Stinkles actually did anything wrong.
NeoIkaruGAF
Gold Member
Yeah, you're right. I read the full thread there and things took quite the wild turnaround.
Some highlights:
That last sentence... imagine writing that down in any other sexual harassment / assault thread this past week.
Aaah yes, capitalism. Of course someone would mention that.
And yeah, let's shut down the industry now that TLOU2 is finally out!
Hold on to your butt, biggy. You just know mods have this post of yours pinned and are looking for evidence to ban you if this turns out to actually be bad for Stinkles...
No you can't. Not at that place, buddy.
Thread locked with no bans at this time because this was the mods when those incredible tweets were brought to the surface:
Last edited:
Charles Brandon
Member
Yeah the point is less about whether he did anything wrong, maybe he did, maybe he didn't - the evidence looks shaky as all fuck, bizarrely presented, she was an adult so 'grooming' is basically just flirting? But who knows, I don't know the guy. I certainly wouldn't regard those tweets as passing the threshold of credibility though.
The point is more that they've painted themselves into a corner with well established discussion rules on accusations, i.e. that they are believed 100% until proven otherwise. No ifs, no buts, no coconuts. So now they either apply that to Stinkles and surely that means he is banned for life and Halo is collateral damage...or they do what they did, which is to lock discussion and wait for more evidence, which looks like breathtaking hypocrisy, undermines their whole approach hitherto and de-legitimises the raison d'etre of the genesis of the site, which was to get out from under an evil sex criminal based on flimsy hearsay evidence. If they can't apply teh same standard they wanted from Neogaf back then, to Stinkles now, then what is the site for?
The point is more that they've painted themselves into a corner with well established discussion rules on accusations, i.e. that they are believed 100% until proven otherwise. No ifs, no buts, no coconuts. So now they either apply that to Stinkles and surely that means he is banned for life and Halo is collateral damage...or they do what they did, which is to lock discussion and wait for more evidence, which looks like breathtaking hypocrisy, undermines their whole approach hitherto and de-legitimises the raison d'etre of the genesis of the site, which was to get out from under an evil sex criminal based on flimsy hearsay evidence. If they can't apply teh same standard they wanted from Neogaf back then, to Stinkles now, then what is the site for?
Nester99
Member
I think she is accusing him of stealing ideas for Halo from her. She "is" cortana after all.
Sounds bat shit crazy
Last edited:
entremet
Member
Don't get me wrong. I'm definitely an unabashed progressive politically.
However, I take the more Jonathan Haidt approach to online communications. His stuff is great and he's been a very astute observer of what's going on online.
We're basically digging in our heels and less civil dialogue across those that don't agree is increasing. Not good long term. We can't solve problems if it's always about the "other".
Jonathan Haidt Is Trying to Heal America’s Divisions
The psychologist shares his thoughts on the pandemic, polarization, and politics.
www.theatlantic.com
Last edited:
#Phonepunk#
Banned
part of MeToo has been about men not just leveraging their physical power over women but their systemic power. Stinkles was upper management. she was someone just out of high school.
right now these same people are thinking Angry Joe was a predator because his poor woman thought "he could make or break her" because he is a minor youtube celeb. that he was so bad because he used his status to mack on a girl. this guy isn't just a personality, he is upper management in a AAA game company. he has real power. the power gap there makes all the difference.
also not being 21 means she is not old enough to drink. 19 is close to being an adult but not quite there.
personally i don't see it as that wrong. it's not illegal. but given the standards that they set through MeToo, it's entirely hypocritical. given Stinkle's outspoken SJW message board warrior personality, it is entirely appropriate to give him shit for this and Era for covering for it.
Last edited:
SoggyBiscuit
Banned
Looks like Boy's Club behaviour to me.
Should be banned and cancelled immedaitely!
SoggyBiscuit
Banned
It seems to happen time and time again that Era will believe all women until it goes against their agenda. Truly the sort of moral arbiters we should aspire to follow.
hyperbertha
Member
#Phonepunk#
Banned
FWIW, this is a technicality. she was not old enough to purchase alcohol
nush
Member
These fucktards have reading comprehension issues suited to them smashing the report button and getting in an extra hit post before the ban hammer drops. That poster didn't call her a slut he's relating how other people said she acted like a slut. Shoot the messenger.
D
Deleted member 17706
Unconfirmed Member
Don't get me wrong. I'm definitely an unabashed progressive politically.
However, I take the more Jonathan Haidt approach to online communications. His stuff is great and he's been a very astute observer of what's going on online.
We're basically digging in our heels and less civil dialogue across those that don't agree is increasing. Not good long term. We can't solve problems if it's always about the "other".
Jonathan Haidt Is Trying to Heal America’s Divisions
The psychologist shares his thoughts on the pandemic, polarization, and politics.
Unfortunately, I've recently seen Haidt be classified as "a gateway to the alt-right" and "Trojan Horse of racist elitism." Sad times.
Last edited by a moderator:
DunDunDunpachi
Banned
Dawkins got the same treatment.
The part that's amazing too is "victim blaming", how is the girl a victim? What crime was committed from what he described that he's "victim blaming"?
Bullet Club
Banned
I bet he has urinals cakes at the bottom of his shower.
MudoSkills
Volcano High Alumnus (Cum Laude)
Feisty Boots being 45 and still having the energy for all this bullshit was a real shocker.
Tuff McNutt
Member
It's even worse. There was a poll on there a while back which showed the majority of users are in their 30s and 40s. Most younger people don't use forums, and those that do already know REEE's reputation and stay away from it.
I have a 22 year old step son and it seems like a lot of people that age and younger are cool with social issues, but hate SJWs trying to tell them how to act or speak. Like they're cool with people being minorities, gay, trans, etc but push back when those people have autistic fits when they're referred to with the "wrong" pronoun or whatever.
Not shockingly, there was many people defending him and the thread was locked pending "further evidence" - the total opposite of the "believe all women" rhetoric that has gotten hundreds of people banned from the site because they dared to say that maybe people should see both sides of a story before launching an internet lynch mob.
Kev Kev
Member
LO fucking L, should have figured as much. of course they did.
Captain Zyrain
Member
I would guess most are 30s, entitled, man-children. There are some older and some younger, you can usually tell.
OutRun88
Member
Fascinating. I'd love to have a face to face over coffee with some of the more vocal members. I can already picture it; me getting lambasted about my beliefs as they become red in the face, forehead vein protruding visibly, spittle flying everywhere all while I calmly sip my coffee with a shit eating grin to boot.
Coolwhhip
Neophyte
I doubt very much they have the balls to spout their online bullshit in person. They are probably awkward and shy.
Captain Zyrain
Member
^^^
I would guess most are actually pleasant to deal with in real life, they may have black hearts but probably know how to function in the real world. A non-zero amount are probably shut-in weirdos though, but I think even of those, most play UP their weirdness as some sort of virtue on Ree.
crumbs
Member
This is how I imagine the extreme members of Ree when they're justifying political violence.
Hudo
Member
I don't know if banning John Wick is a wise move.
- Status