If David Wise is making DKC:TF, then Kenji Yamamoto is free to return to Metroid!!
What is this pedestal you people put retro on? They are an arm of Nintendo internal development through spd, not dome poor underrated independent being held back by Nintendo tyranny. Nintendo brought back a classic series to critical and commercial success, of course a sequel would come. Of fucking course Nintendo called the shots, they own the studio. Talking bullshit about budgets you know nothing about is utter nonsense.I call bullshit. DK Country Returns was A) cheaper to make than Prime. And B) sold really well. I can't see a scenario where Nintendo didn't call the shots on this project.
The sequel to one of the finest 2d platformers ever made is a bad thing now
stay salty, my friends![]()
As recently as last week I said I was hoping if not a new IP Retro was doing a DKCR2 with more Kongs, swimming and David Wise back. This is absolutely what i was asking for, not that I'm not aware I'm in a small minority here.I don't think anyone asked for this.
This is coming from someone who loved DKCR to death.
Completely agreed. Even if people wanted something different there's no way this can be considered bad.
Loved DKCR, and I'm genuinely excited by DKC:TF.
Two things though that leave an empty pit in my stomach:
1) Why couldn't Retro have a new IP? I'm sure I wasn't the only one who was looking towards the idea of Nintendo-branded Western FPS to compete with Halo and Killzone, only for the sheer novelty of seeing what they would be able to accomplish, with guidance from Miyamoto to make that 'Halo-killer' he boasts he could make. Hell, anything with a new mascot to cheer on and hope to join the roster in Super Smash Bros.
2) Since Retroy is doing DK again, why are there absolutely no mentions of Kremlings? I want to be able to see King K. Rool again stomping around, kicking ass and taking names! (Granted I've yet to beat the last world of DKCR, so I have no idea if there's some sort of secret easter egg I've missed or yet to see).
Loved DKCR, and I'm genuinely excited by DKC:TF.
Two things though that leave an empty pit in my stomach:
1) Why couldn't Retro have a new IP? I'm sure I wasn't the only one who was looking towards the idea of Nintendo-branded Western FPS to compete with Halo and Killzone, only for the sheer novelty of seeing what they would be able to accomplish, with guidance from Miyamoto to make that 'Halo-killer' he boasts he could make. Hell, anything with a new mascot to cheer on and hope to join the roster in Super Smash Bros.
2) Since Retroy is doing DK again, why are there absolutely no mentions of Kremlings? I want to be able to see King K. Rool again stomping around, kicking ass and taking names! (Granted I've yet to beat the last world of DKCR, so I have no idea if there's some sort of secret easter egg I've missed or yet to see).
Something about Rare owning the Kremlin characters or something like that.
I call bullshit. DK Country Returns was A) cheaper to make than Prime. And B) sold really well. I can't see a scenario where Nintendo didn't call the shots on this project.
What happened to an Uncharted-esque StarTropics?
Bullshit. You say you loved it and i assume know how much its admired but you can't imagine people would want or ask for another?I don't think anyone asked for this.
This is coming from someone who loved DKCR to death.
The game looks incredible, but yeah, I'd rather see Retro work on something original. A sci fi inspired original IP, preferably.
I hope they're working on something else, with only some of their team devoted to DKCR2.
Thats false, Nintendo owns K Rool and the Kremlins.
Retro studios chose to do this game over Metroid.
That's still dumb. So you're saying nintendo was like " hey retro make anything you like! " then they chose a donkey kong country sequel. I doubt it. They should have been able to make a new ip and that's what I was expecting.
richiek said:If Retro had announced another Metroid Prime game, I guarantee that we wouldn't be hearing any of this "why can't Retro create an new IP" whining that's going on right now.
The game looks incredible, but yeah, I'd rather see Retro work on something original. A sci fi inspired original IP, preferably.
I hope they're working on something else, with only some of their team devoted to DKCR2.
A. No mention of near future in that post (I agree that that particular thing is already getting played out).How many more sci-fi inspired near future shooters do we need?
I am 100% certain this is a soup-up 3DS game. The view angles, simply, gives it away.
They should have kept it on the platform instead of porting DKC Returns to 3DS.
Another hint being in the shitter when it comes to WiiU. Porting up 3DS games and making up the difference with a port no one asked for. Superb.
And, more importantly, why did they assign Retro to making a 3DS game to being with.
It's like when Nintendo released Kirby two years in a row.
Heh, fair point. Retro did such a good job on it, though. I'd love to see them do return to it with a totally fresh IP.How many more sci-fi inspired near future shooters do we need?
How many people that worked on Metroid Prime are even at Retro these days?
How many more sci-fi inspired near future shooters do we need?
If Retro had announced another Metroid Prime game, I guarantee that we wouldn't be hearing any of this "why can't Retro create an new IP" whining that's going on right now.
You guys do realize that this gen isn't over and there's still time for Retro to make other games, right? We're not even a year into this console.
Oh yea, and DKC:Returns was one of the best 2D platformers ever made, this one will be fine.