Cyberpunkd
Member
It is not correct. It is used on watches to to style symmetry.IIII is correcto too, its mostly used on watches fom easy reading.
It is not correct. It is used on watches to to style symmetry.IIII is correcto too, its mostly used on watches fom easy reading.
No it's not.
The correct way is "IV"
Quite often to be honestHow often do you think about the Roman empire?
I'll trigger your triggies.Why the frick does half of all games use Roman numerals in their sequels? It doesn't look any cooler and it just confuses people.
For example, something like GTA VI is nonsense . And none of these games actually has a Roman setting.
So it literally has no reason to use numerals except for that some lunatic in marketing thinks it looks cooler if they use a bunch of x's and v's instead of a normal number that people know how to read.
That is a wide mistakeIIII is correcto too, its mostly used on watches fom easy reading.
Video games didn't invent numbering volumes with roman numerals
![]()
Man, why ppl is this dumb ?That is a wide mistake
That is a wide mistake
For people who make computer things it's weird how they don't seem to know how numbers work.Oh well, Xbox went from nothing to 360, and then to 1, and then a series.
(I'm pretty sure the series has been cancelled due to poor viewership)
I'll trigger your triggies.
MDCCCLXXXVIII
Are you convulsing already?![]()
Or letters, even. I mean really. "S" and "X" in English are not that far apart, and I'm willing to bet easily confused by casuals. Yet they did it, twice.For people who make computer things it's weird how they don't seem to know how numbers work.
hahahahha![]()
Looks better than a random 6
No it's not.
The correct way is "IV"
you should go to Rome and look at the numbers on the colosseum gates. you won't find IV but multiple instances of IIII
also look at most clocks... Big Ben is famous for using IV instead of IIII, because it's so unusual.
Of course that with an empire that lasted a thousand years, there were changes in the language.
But the standard that we use to represent Roman numerals is IV, not IIII.
Why the frick does half of all games use Roman numerals in their sequels? It doesn't look any cooler and it just confuses people.
For example, something like GTA VI is nonsense . And none of these games actually has a Roman setting.
So it literally has no reason to use numerals except for that some lunatic in marketing thinks it looks cooler if they use a bunch of x's and v's instead of a normal number that people know how to read.
That mistake is so wide, it goes all the way back to ancient Roman sundials. Thankfully you're here to finally set everyone straight.That is a wide mistake