PhoncipleBone
Banned
Tobor said:Ok guys, it's time for some REAL TALK(TM Tobor Inc.) about how bad the Mech designs were, specifically the weapons.
If anyone remembers Short Circuit, that film had an advanced military robot that after falling off a cliff, had to physically press a button on it's chest in order To deploy a parachute. A robot... that had to press a button. The lack of common sense in that design was impossible to top, or so I thought.
Why would you so poorly design a mech that it needs to hold a rifle? Forcing the operator to play air guitar with his weapon is inefficient. He can't line of sight the rifle, and if auto targeting is required anyway, then mounting the weapons on chassis makes better sense. You free up the operators hands and have a deadlier machine.
I know why it makes sense in Camerons view, it's how he jams the symmetry between the two cultures down our throats in the last battle, and makes it a fair fight. But I defy anyone to practically explain such a lack of foresight in design. The humans deserved to lose out of sheer stupidity.
I guess they had it use hands to hold weapons since it is probably just a multiuse tool. Basically for loading, construction, war, etc. Sure, they could mount guns all over it War Machine style, but just slapping a gun in its hands as needed would save money in the end. Need another gunner? Grab a mech and give it a rifle. Need help unloading that pallet of supplies? Grab a mech and have it start unloading. That way they can just add whatever weapon is pertinent to the job at hand. I am sure there were some flamethrower mechs around, and some rocket launcher ones. At least that is my reasoning.