I've now seen the movie twice. Still love it. Still the best movie of 2009 imo.
Here's the thing with formula breaking in films-- it's usually boring. There's a reason that these things are cliche: They're easily accessible to audiences and have historically proven to be strong at driving the plot. I don't get the idea of some movie-goers wanting complications in their films just for the sake of complication. I'm guilty of it, too, trust me. For reference just look at my posts in the Inglorious Basterds thread when it first came out :lol.
But since then I've realized that moviegoing is meant to be fun sometimes, and not an intellectual exercise. If it impacts the story and makes the story better, then great, but I don't see how avoiding cliche or reworking the story of Avatar to not be so simple actually improves the movie-going experience in any way whatsoever.
Look at some of the best action films of all time, and they all have the same themes. They're not great because they're groundbreaking, they're great because they successfully rehash common themes that people love and compel them to watch it again for entertainment purposes. Is there anyone that said that Terminator 2 wasn't cliche? No. But they still went in droves to see it and it's still loved, and that movie had an even dumber plot device than this one. If T2 came out today it'd be SKEWERED by GAF. "Wait, so they ran out of story with the Terminator being a bad guy, had him disappear, and he comes back as a good guy?"
I just think people do everyone a disservice when they hold big-budget cinema to the standards of art house indie film, and vice versa. You don't walk out of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and say, "Well I would have liked it better if it's lead character was someone I could more identify with." So why would you hold a movie like Avatar to those opposite restraints?
It's big budget cinema, with a solid if not a bit cliche story told wonderfully with incredible new technology, and anyone faulting it for being any of these things probably should have seen something else instead because Avatar accomplishes everything it's supposed to in absolutely astronomical fashion.
Here's the thing with formula breaking in films-- it's usually boring. There's a reason that these things are cliche: They're easily accessible to audiences and have historically proven to be strong at driving the plot. I don't get the idea of some movie-goers wanting complications in their films just for the sake of complication. I'm guilty of it, too, trust me. For reference just look at my posts in the Inglorious Basterds thread when it first came out :lol.
But since then I've realized that moviegoing is meant to be fun sometimes, and not an intellectual exercise. If it impacts the story and makes the story better, then great, but I don't see how avoiding cliche or reworking the story of Avatar to not be so simple actually improves the movie-going experience in any way whatsoever.
Look at some of the best action films of all time, and they all have the same themes. They're not great because they're groundbreaking, they're great because they successfully rehash common themes that people love and compel them to watch it again for entertainment purposes. Is there anyone that said that Terminator 2 wasn't cliche? No. But they still went in droves to see it and it's still loved, and that movie had an even dumber plot device than this one. If T2 came out today it'd be SKEWERED by GAF. "Wait, so they ran out of story with the Terminator being a bad guy, had him disappear, and he comes back as a good guy?"
I just think people do everyone a disservice when they hold big-budget cinema to the standards of art house indie film, and vice versa. You don't walk out of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and say, "Well I would have liked it better if it's lead character was someone I could more identify with." So why would you hold a movie like Avatar to those opposite restraints?
It's big budget cinema, with a solid if not a bit cliche story told wonderfully with incredible new technology, and anyone faulting it for being any of these things probably should have seen something else instead because Avatar accomplishes everything it's supposed to in absolutely astronomical fashion.