U K Narayan said:Veronica Belmont
The Na'vi don't label humans as Dreamwalkers. They label Avatar users as Dreamwalkers.Medalion said:Is there any explanation why the aliens refer to humans as Dreamwalkers?
Medalion said:Is there any explanation why the aliens refer to humans as Dreamwalkers?
They control the Avatars in their sleepMedalion said:Is there any explanation why the aliens refer to humans as Dreamwalkers?
Puncture said:Went to see this a few hours earlier today and I feel exactly the same. I mean this post nails it.
I enjoyed the film but there was an extreme feeling of same ol same ol. Which is a goddamn shame considering this is such a technical marvel. The CG and the CG characters in particular were just amazing. I feel like it was a bit squandered on such a cliche story. When the tribal leader was her dad I about lost my goddamn mind. REALLY? I would say I saw it coming, but in reality, I refused to see if coming because it would have been so freaking par for the course that I just KNEW there was no way in hell they would go that route.
Then the arranged marriage, the angry jealous husband to be, the gaining the trust of the natives, the inevitable turn against the warmongering ignorant human beings of course..... FUCK man.
This had better get a fucking sequel that rights this shit.
Edit: I also hated how completely unrestrained the "Marine" was. I couldnt buy that this guy was a Marine, in an extremely expensive and exclusive op, and the second he gets his Avatar he is breaking shit and ignoring orders and sprinting through the place. He couldnt keep his hands off of ANYTHING. Slapping plants and shit when the Na'vi chick was escorting him to their living area.
He seemed anything but military.
jett said:The sequel will be what T2 is to T1.
*assplosion*
Kyzer said:Well, the day a story is made that is as interesting as the ones with cliches, I'll check 'em out, but pretty much everything since I can remember is like that. And hey, there are a lot of plot devices. How differently and unaccordingly would everything have to happen if she WASN'T the chief's daughter? If it was just some random chick of the tribe, nobody would listen to her, and the entire story would need work-arounds.
And it was supposed to symbolize his pure spirit, I'm pretty sure. "He's like a baby." There's a reason that was a motif. Not to mention the uncontainable joy of having legs again...
That's true. I guess if we knew more about Earth's condition and how unobtainium could have helped, maybe that would have helped us understand the corporation and military's motivation a little better.The-Warning said:If I had to pick the biggest flaw though, it was those villain characters. Wow talk about cartoon bad guys.
In your opinion. The broad arc everyone knew going in. But I thought there was a great deal of originality in the details, and I found the characters to be much stronger than they're painted as. While familiar in the overall arc, I think the quality of the story (and the story telling) is one of the films strengths.Puncture said:Hey it is what it is. You can argue it all day but there was next to no surprise or mystery in the movie whatsoever. There was a lot of eyecandy, some lovely pacing, among other things. But the story was flat out forgettable.
Period.
Masks on! MASKS ON!a Master Ninja said:Just saw Avatar for the first time today. He may be cliché, but scarred general dude's badass displays were damn fun to watch.
Agree all around.Karma Kramer said:I think there's something very interesting going on underneath all Cameron movies. I think he has a unique ability to create something completely relatable and universal, filled with cliches... but at its core this is probably one of the more thought provoking films I have seen since the Matrix. Films that put the intellectualism at the fore-front come across as too preachy and it prevents an individual from experiencing the film's message in the form of an epiphany. Do you ever find yourself wanting to re-watch Synecdoche, New York? I'm sure there is a shit-load to take away from that movie, but it fails to provide an experience like Avatar, which you happily enjoy rinsing and repeating.
:lolGhaleonEB said:Also, I was digging through my GAF bookmarks folder and found this:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=18296466&postcount=6846
He's banned, alas.
Dude I'm gonna be straight up with you. If you don't see this movie in 3D the first time, you're missing out on an experience of a life time. Just my take on it.HUELEN10 said:So, my pops wants to drag me to see this movie. I have a lot of it spoiled already, but I don't want any more of it spoiled. I have read in this very thread however that the script and stuff, to many, is average. Again, I have missed the last couple of pages of this thread because I don't want more spoilers. If you are not big on romance or this type of sci-fi, would it be worth it? I am not trying to discredit a film I haven't even seen, I am merely trying to see if it is worth going, after all, no movie is tailor-made for all tastes, right?
Oh, one more thing...
3D is NOT an option.
HUELEN10 said:So, my pops wants to drag me to see this movie. I have a lot of it spoiled already, but I don't want any more of it spoiled. I have read in this very thread however that the script and stuff, to many, is average. Again, I have missed the last couple of pages of this thread because I don't want more spoilers. If you are not big on romance or this type of sci-fi, would it be worth it? I am not trying to discredit a film I haven't even seen, I am merely trying to see if it is worth going, after all, no movie is tailor-made for all tastes, right?
Oh, one more thing...
3D is NOT an option.
3D is not an option, trust me. That is something I cannot change.TacticalFox88 said:Dude I'm gonna be straight up with you. If you don't see this movie in 3D the first time, you're missing out on an experience of a life time. Just my take on it.
Forkball said:I saw it yesterday. It was entertaining and the 3D was impressive, but this has to be one of the most cliched, predictable, made for mass appeal movie I've seen. Let's run through a list of SOME of the cliches in the movie:
Generic, cookie cutter warrior lead
War-mongering villain
Villain has scary scar
Nature good, technology bad
Noble savages
Lead falls in love with native girl
Native girl is actually the daughter of the leader of the natives
Native girl is to marry another guy due to tradition
Native guy is asshole
Lead does something that only a few people in history have done and is mentioned earlier in the film
Lead learns the ways of the natives
Small, weasley corporate guy
Lead turns his back on his own people to help natives
War is only fought for money/power/greed
Lead is shunned by natives, then accepted, then shunned again, and then finally accepted
Being "one" with nature
Andbanging under a magical tree was totally in FFX.
I wasn't really blown away by Pandora (GET IT LIKE PANDORA'S BOX IF YOU OPEN IT BAD THINGS GONNA HAPPEN). Bright, glowing things can only captivate me for so long. The creature designs weren't that original either. I'm pretty sure I killed most of the creatures on Pandora in Phantasy Star Online. Cameron basically just took existing animals, made them reptiles, and put some extra legs/wings/eyes on them.
Plus the dialogue, dear God. Who didn't roll their eyes at "you have a strong heart." It's like Cameron wrote this when he was 14 and didn't go back and proofread it. Also, the object the company was trying to get was called "Unobtainium." Honest to god, that is what James Cameron called it. Is this supposed to be some meta joke, or does he just not take his screenplay seriously and instead would rather perfect how the texture on Neytiri's boobs looks like? Once again, here is a short list of awful, awful pieces of dialogue.
"Everything out there wants to eat your eyes for jujubes"
Actually, I'm just going to stop there. Will there even be jujubes in the future? Hell, they aren't popular NOW. Who eats jujubes?
I'm being pretty harsh on the film, and that's because a lot of people simply can't look past glowing 3d plants to find out that the story and dialogue is something that Cameron probably came up with in a weekend. It's a film that is only impressive on a technical aspect and will become less admired as the years go on, kind of like Titanic.
He's blind in one eye.Karma Kramer said:Unless your blind in one eye... go see it in 3D
Hmm. My question once again is how much of the film's total enjoyment is dependent upon 3D. I mean, obviously it's the same film, but would the experience be any less, or merely different? I really want it to be the latter, you can imagine why.Scullibundo said:Why isn't 3D an option?
Any way, my mum who hates all things sci-fi loved it when I took her yesterday. Something I have never seen her get excited over. Whether you like the story or not, I guarantee you that you won't feel cheated for your money like with most other films. Many like the story very much, despite its predictability.
Enjoyment is not dependent on 3D. 3D adds another dimension (hurr) to the experience, but other than that, with 2D you still have the exceptional world, amazing action, likeable characters and well done story.HUELEN10 said:He's blind in one eye.
jerk
Hmm. My question once again is how much of the film's total enjoyment is dependent upon 3D. I mean, obviously it's the same film, but would the experience be any less, or merely different? I really want it to be the latter, you can imagine why.
Please understand that I am not trying to drag the film or anything of the sort, but I know that a lot of you loved the movie. Who better to be honest with me right? Would you like to take your father to a half-experience that rubs his weakness it in his face? Of course not, that would be cruel.
Maybe you should find a different RealD theater. I've seen some that are as bright as they should be and some that are very dim.JB1981 said:I think I am going to see this movie for a second time tomorrow. Will probably just see it in Real3D again. I can't imagine the IMAX 3D experience is all that much better. I was very impressed w/ the sound in my Real3D theater. Just wish the picture wasn't so dim, there is so much light and saturation lost.
He's the embodiment of the concept of the American war machine that's itching for bloodshed.Medalion said:I wanted to ask a question about the main antagonist's motives... why does he keep pressing on being an aboslute dick to destroy the native's land and people and anyone who helps them, despite no one else around him wants him to?
Because he's about as deep as snidely whiplash or the villains in captain planet cartoons.Krev said:He's the embodiment of the concept of the American war machine that's itching for bloodshed.
People do what they are paid to do. He's a combat veteran who loves the fight, has been hired to use force, and is surrounded with weaponry galore at his command. And since his injury, he's had a grudge against not just the Na'vi but the entire native population.I wanted to ask a question about the main antagonist's motives... why does he keep pressing on being an aboslute dick to destroy the native's land and people and anyone who helps them, despite no one else around him wants him to?
HUELEN10 said:He's blind in one eye.
jerk
Hmm. My question once again is how much of the film's total enjoyment is dependent upon 3D. I mean, obviously it's the same film, but would the experience be any less, or merely different? I really want it to be the latter, you can imagine why.
Please understand that I am not trying to drag the film or anything of the sort, but I know that a lot of you loved the movie. Who better to be honest with me right? Would you like to take your father to a half-experience that rubs his weakness it in his face? Of course not, that would be cruel.
Dead said:Enjoyment is not dependent on 3D. 3D adds another dimension (hurr) to the experience, but other than that, with 2D you still have the exceptional world, amazing action, likeable characters and well done story.
Regulus Tera said:I saw this today.
It was enjoyable, but the 3D didn't feel like 3D at all. Most of the time it only looked like 2D, and when it was obviously 3D it made me feel uneasy.
I think what I'm trying to say is that I don't know if I like this 3D thingamajig or not.
tabsina said:I actually liked that the 3d was subtle in most parts of the movie, you don't notice it, but it is in every scene, the way I think about this type of 3d is "a 3d room beyond the screen" in a sense that it doesn't pop out of the screen, it adds a feeling of depth of field, as if you are looking into another room, rather than a flat screen
I think he means you know it's there...but you don't know it's there. It's kinda hard to explain.Regulus Tera said:My problem with it is that, if you don't notice it, then what's the point of 3D?
I think the only movie I've seen that actually utilises it as an enhancement that's not annoying or irregular is Coraline.
It could still be number 1 for this weekend if it beats SH on Saturday and Sunday (which I expect to happen)Scullibundo said:Wow, it only JUST beat Avatar on its opening weekend and was also playing in 174 more theatres. The legs on this motherfucker! Expect to see Avatar back at #1 next week.
Combine said:What a first week. I'm actually kind of stunned that it really has only just been one week it's been out.
Combine said:Anecdotal evidence for the win. Both true IMAX theaters in the area are sold out for all tomorrows shows and almost all on Sunday (no doubt will be by tomorrow).
RSLAEV said:I refuse to let this thread convince me that hackey bullshit cliche's are actually 'Familiar Plot Devices'
"A cliché is a saying, expression, idea, or element of an artistic work which has been overused to the point of losing its original meaning or effect rendering it a stereotype, especially when at some earlier time it was considered meaningful or novel. The term is frequently used in modern culture for an action or idea which is expected or predictable, based on a prior event."
So I think the fact that these elements can be seen coming a mile away and are so predictable as to strip them of any emotional impact makes them cliche. You may see similar elements in other *good* movies, but that doesn't excuse them.
RSLAEV said:I refuse to let this thread convince me that hackey bullshit cliche's are actually 'Familiar Plot Devices'
"A cliché is a saying, expression, idea, or element of an artistic work which has been overused to the point of losing its original meaning or effect rendering it a stereotype, especially when at some earlier time it was considered meaningful or novel. The term is frequently used in modern culture for an action or idea which is expected or predictable, based on a prior event."
So I think the fact that these elements can be seen coming a mile away and are so predictable as to strip them of any emotional impact makes them cliche. You may see similar elements in other *good* movies, but that doesn't excuse them.
This sounds like something a poster had said a little earlier in this thread.Dead said:OH shit. Avatar am doomed?
http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/
Both Sherlock and Avatar estimated at a 24 million Friday with Sherlock possibly ahead, Poor Cameron![]()
![]()
![]()
Its not better than The New WorldBruceLeeRoy said:Though I do understand peoples complaints about the story using familiar plot devices and that while I was watching it I had a general idea of where it was going to lead I still thought the journey it took to get there was almost flawless. Yes there is some dances with wolves or some last samurai and such but I think it captured all those elements in such a breathtaking setting and with such great characters that at the end its simply better than all the movies it imitates.
To me anyway.