• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Rottenwatch: AVATAR (82%)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Count Dookkake said:
2) Some posters were adamant that such a connection was impossible, even going so far as to say it was typical of American thought. Empire is not American.

I agree that this line of thought is pretty dumb. I simply didnt feel the scene was analogous to 9/11, but I sure as shit wasnt agreeing with those saying that seeing 9/11 symbolism in movies is "typically American" :lol
 
Solo said:
The more successful the movie is in theatres, the longer it usually takes to get the BD. Im calling May for Avatar.
I'm actually going to go ahead and say it will take maybe a year to get the home release version out, depending on what they want to do with it. Depending how many features and how extended the edition will be (will it just be the final final rendered footage that was "snipped" or are they going to try and create rendered scenes for the scenes that were filmed but were left out. All of that is no doubt up to Cameron). The Blu-Ray edition itself is no doubt going to be packed to the brim with features.
Tobor said:
As for the movie, there are entire sections of the script that were filmed and aren't in the final cut, including quite a lot of exposition.
Ah, I guess that reinforces what's been stated. I wonder how many scenes will be restored? I believe the estimate was that 40 minutes were cut.
The reason I say a year is because I believe that was the case with all the LOTR Extended Edition movies. Although, I think they released the theatrical edition first much earlier.
 
Becoming one of "The People" is so damn hypnotic. Great track, can't stop listening to the OST. I said long before that it was awesome and got shit for it as well lol but I still stand by it. I think it's really good.

Edit:
Jake's first flight
track is great as well.
I see you track is off the chain as well.
 
Solo said:
I agree that this line of thought is pretty dumb. I simply didnt feel the scene was analogous to 9/11, but I sure as shit wasnt agreeing with those saying that seeing 9/11 symbolism in movies is "typically American" :lol
9/11 was a huge thing in the UK as well, I'd be surprised if it wasn't big news and 'life changing' everywhere. I didn't think it was strictly an American view point. My point was how many ways are there to blow up a tree? The argument that there was 'dust', and therefore it must be inspired by 9/11 is moronic though. Cameron is a freak when it comes to realism when it comes to things like that, it shouldn't surprise anyone that it's realistic. I also just disagree with the idea that it looks all that similar. Or that the actual incident itself was at all similar.
 
Solo said:
Are you kidding me? Doomed? Thats an 11$ drop Friday to Friday. 11%. Blockbuster movies just dont do that. Hell, barely any kind of movie does that, full stop. An 11% drop, and the weekend intake is going to be almost as high as opening weekend, and its going to beat Sherlock Holmes. That is what we call kicking ass on all fronts :lol Movie is a massive success already, and its still got a ways to go.
I'm pretty sure that was sarcasm.

(Goddamn, this weekend is going to be HUGE.)
 
I think the intro to the movie was perfect. I'm talking up until the part where quaritch finishes his debfriefing. When the shuttle pulled away from the station and the camera followed it through the atmosphere I was like :O ...the music for that was excellent too.
 
If it does make $70M this weekend, that is a 9% drop from opening weekend to this weekend. That DOES. NOT. HAPPEN. A 45% drop is considered great for a blockbuster; a sub 10% drop is unheard of.

Cameron *bow*
 
layzie1989 said:
I think the intro to the movie was perfect. I'm talking up until the part where quaritch finishes his debfriefing. When the shuttle pulled away from the station and the camera followed it through the atmosphere I was like :O ...the music for that was excellent too.
100% agree.
 
I really hope Cameron delays the home release as much as possible. Keep people in the theaters.

stuburns said:
9/11 was a huge thing in the UK as well, I'd be surprised if it wasn't big news and 'life changing' everywhere. I didn't think it was strictly an American view point. My point was how many ways are there to blow up a tree? The argument that there was 'dust', and therefore it must be inspired by 9/11 is moronic though. Cameron is a freak when it comes to realism when it comes to things like that, it shouldn't surprise anyone that it's realistic. I also just disagree with the idea that it looks all that similar. Or that the actual incident itself was at all similar.

1) There are many ways to destroy a tree in a sci-fi/action setting.

2) No one said that dust meant 9/11. There are other similarities involving context and composition.

3) Empire Magazine, the biggest and most influential film magazine from the UK, saw the connection.

4) You are forgetting that one of your arguments was that Cameron wrote the 'scriptment' in the 90s and couldn't possibly have been influenced by 9/11.

5) It is okay.
 
Solo said:
If it does make $70M this weekend, that is a 9% drop from opening weekend to this weekend. That DOES. NOT. HAPPEN. A 45% drop is considered great for a blockbuster; a sub 10% drop is unheard of.

Cameron *bow*

I called 1 billion WW when the first numbers released. I was only hoping for 60 million for the second weekend take. If it pulls 70 million+ in weekend 2, I don't know what to think.

He really may have done it again.
 
StoOgE said:
I called 1 billion WW when the first numbers released. I was only hoping for 60 million for the second weekend take. If it pulls 70 million+ in weekend 2, I don't know what to think.

He really may have done it again.
The crazy thing about this movie for me personally and people I know is that I want to back to Imax 3D /reald 3d to see it again. I don't remember the last movie that had this effect on me, ever. Maybe more people feel this way as well and that in itself is great accomplishment imo.
 
Count Dookkake said:
4) You are forgetting that one of your arguments was that Cameron wrote the 'scriptment' in the 90s and couldn't possibly have been influenced by 9/11.
I don't want to oversell the case, but this is a dubious argument; yes, the narrative was in place way before 9/11, but that doesn't mean 9/11 could not have possibly influenced the way Cameron chose to film it.
 
Boxofficemojo has the Friday estimates:

1. Sherlock Holmes - $24,860,000
2. Avatar - $23,500,000
3. Alvin and the Chipmunks 2 - $14,500,000

It's gonna be interesting if Saturday and Sunday will see a turnaround for Avatar. It could be that SH will drop off while Avatar will be going strong.

Avatar worldwide gross is $416,454,953
 
Count Dookkake said:
1) There are many ways to destroy a tree in a sci-fi/action setting.

2) No one said that dust meant 9/11. There are other similarities involving context and composition.

3) Empire Magazine, the biggest and most influential film magazine from the UK, saw the connection.

4) You are forgetting that one of your arguments was that Cameron wrote the 'scriptment' in the 90s and couldn't possibly have been influenced by 9/11.

5) It is okay.
1) No, there really aren't, read the scriptment and tell me there how to do it to make it 'less' like 9/11, even though I don't think it bares any real resemblance anyway.

2) Yes, they did.

3) The 'connection'? Considering the 'war on terror' connection Cameron has mentioned himself, purely in terms of the story, there is of course an obvious 'connection'. But it's a retrospective view point. I'm quite sure had he just released True Lies, we'd be having the exact same discussion. Maybe even with T2. A ton of movies have scenes which had the film been released post-9/11, people would see the events within it as reminiscent.

4) My point was I believe had 9/11 never happened, that scene would be exactly the same. And that people see what they want to see in it. If he wanted to reference 9/11, he could have done it better. If he just wanted a load of people to blow up a big tree, he did it very well.
 
FoneBone said:
I don't want to oversell the case, but this is a dubious argument; yes, the narrative was in place way before 9/11, but that doesn't mean 9/11 could not have possibly influenced the way Cameron chose to film it.

See also: Revenge of the Sith and Bush.

ymmv said:
It's gonna be interesting if Saturday and Sunday will see a turnaround for Avatar. It could be that SH will drop off while Avatar will be going strong.

This is what will happen.

Also, I think Avatar will end up taking the weekend.



EDIT FOR STUBURNS -

Only 14 posts mention 'dust.' None of them look to do what you claim.
 
ymmv said:
Boxofficemojo has the Friday estimates:

1. Sherlock Holmes - $24,860,000
2. Avatar - $23,500,000
3. Alvin and the Chipmunks 2 - $14

Avatar worldwide gross is $416,454,953

Like Scrooge McDuck once said, " More, more I want to see more."
 
WrikaWrek said:
I think i liked Star Trek better than Avatar, i watched it on Blu Ray again.

Why do i feel wrong, like i shouldn't?
Because you seem to care what other people may think of you. :lol
 
Count Dookkake said:
EDIT FOR STUBURNS -

Only 14 posts mention 'dust.' None of them look to do what you claim.
Maybe it wasn't the word 'dust', but that was the jist of a posters argument.

The Na'vi bravely fire at the gunships with their longbows
and spears, which bounce harmlessly off the armored ships.
Quaritch laughs, then fires an incendiary rocket into the
roots of the central tree. It explodes with a fireball,
setting the interior on fire. The Na'vi flee into the
forest.
The gunships fire more incendiary rounds, setting the
whole village on fire. When the Na'vi have cleared the
village center, Quaritch fires high-explosives into the
base of the central tree. The massive roots explode into
matchsticks, and the tree topples slowly, crashing down
with a thunderous sound.

I just think it would be exactly the same had 9/11 not happened. But we'll never agree on it.
 
WrikaWrek said:
I think i liked Star Trek better than Avatar, i watched it on Blu Ray again.

Why do i feel wrong, like i shouldn't?

Its funny because both movies are awesome, and essentially share the exact same strengths and weaknesses (both have pretty weak scripts), and manage to overcome the weaknesses. The only real differences are that ST's cast put in much better/engaging overall performances, and Avatar's action is light years better.
 
Solo said:
Its funny because both movies are awesome, and essentially share the exact same strengths and weaknesses (both have pretty weak scripts), and manage to overcome the weaknesses.

Also both have Zoe in them...
 
Solo said:
Its funny because both movies are awesome, and essentially share the exact same strengths and weaknesses (both have pretty weak scripts), and manage to overcome the weaknesses. The only real differences are that ST's cast put in much better/engaging overall performances, and Avatar's action is light years better.
Strongly agreed on the better cast and characters in Star Trek, but not so much on the script... I mean, Trek's script is really, truly insultingly dumb, and while Avatar is cliched and predictable as hell, its internal logic is at least a lot more sound.

But yeah, I think I still liked Trek better, and can't put my finger on why.
 
stuburns said:
Really should be in the thread title at this point. Something along the lines of this.

"Zoe Saldana's James Cameron's Avatar starring Zoe Saldana"

I Zoe agree! Zoe much!
 
stuburns said:
Really should be in the thread title at this point. Something along the lines of this.

"Zoe Saldana's James Cameron's Avatar starring Zoe Saldana"

Star Trek's Zoe Saldana's James Cameron's Avatar Starring Zoe Saldana who you may remember such films as Star Trek.
 
FoneBone said:
Strongly agreed on the better cast and characters in Star Trek, but not so much on the script... I mean, Trek's script is really, truly insultingly dumb, and while Avatar is cliched and predictable as hell, its internal logic is at least a lot more sound.

But yeah, I think I still liked Trek better, and can't put my finger on why.

Making me choose between Avatar, ST and D9 is like making me choose between my unborn children. I suppose though that if I were pressed, for the overall package, Id rank them Avatar > Star Trek > District 9. The greater than signs dont mean a whole lot though because they are all so awesome in their own ways.

2009 rocks if for no other reason than for resurrecting mainstream sc-fi.
 
StoOgE said:
Is it wrong that I think she is sexier in Avatar

Cameron, what have you done to me?
she was the hottest in Guess Who

imo

33az4gn.jpg

(I have this in high rez version if anyone need it :lol )
 
Solo said:
Making me choose between Avatar, ST and D9 is like making me choose between my unborn children. I suppose though that if I were pressed, for the overall package, Id rank them Avatar > Star Trek > District 9. The greater than signs dont mean a whole lot though because they are all so awesome in their own ways.

2009 rocks if for no other reason than for resurrecting mainstream sc-fi.

This post is filled with truth. Oh god, so much truth. Agreed 100%
 
Solo said:
Making me choose between Avatar, ST and D9 is like making me choose between my unborn children. I suppose though that if I were pressed, for the overall package, Id rank them Avatar > Star Trek > District 9. The greater than signs dont mean a whole lot though because they are all so awesome in their own ways.

2009 rocks if for no other reason than for resurrecting mainstream sc-fi.
Putting District 9 as a worse movie than either is just... frankly, I don't know how to process that. But, uh, to each his own.
 
FoneBone said:
Putting District 9 as a worse movie than either is just... frankly, I don't know how to process that. But, uh, to each his own.

Direct me to where I said "worse". I said that I was ranking them on the overall package, which includes intangibles like how entertaining it was, replayability, the overall feeling the movie leaves me with, and so on. Objectively D9 does a lot of things better than Avatar or ST, but I prefer both movies to it due to those intangibles.
 
StoOgE said:
Is it wrong that I think she is sexier in Avatar

Cameron, what have you done to me?
James Cameron: Responsible for increasing the population of furries in the world by a factor of 500 singlehandedly.

yes I think she is hot in Avatar too
 
polyh3dron said:
James Cameron: Responsible for increasing the population of furries in the world by a factor of 500 singlehandedly.

yes I think she is hot in Avatar too
I wonder how long it actually took for the artists and Cameron to come to a consensus that they had made her as "sexy" as possible? I still laugh at how the main point in the design and look of her character was she had to be fuckable. :lol
 
Combine said:
I wonder how long it actually took for the artists and Cameron to come to a consensus that they had made her as "sexy" as possible? I still laugh at how the main point in the design and look of her character was she had to be fuckable. :lol
Well I think they tried to make it 'borderline' hot, she is hot in it, but it's not an instant 'holy shit I fancy an alien' thing, it takes some time. They could have given her a 'human' nose like Weaver's Avatar. Things like that, made her less alien. Although she is already the most human looking Na'vi. Most of them have horrid bones on their chest like an extended rib cage, she does not, well, I'm sure she does, it's just not visible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom