Pretty much, no debating it.ToxicAdam said:The schedule had nothing to do with it.
mcg.jpg
Pretty much, no debating it.ToxicAdam said:The schedule had nothing to do with it.
mcg.jpg
ToxicAdam said:The schedule had nothing to do with it.
mcg.jpg
Snaku said:It had more to do with that frankenstein script.
Was still better than T3. Worthington and CG Arnie at least made it enjoyable.
Snaku said:It had more to do with that frankenstein script.
Was still better than T3. Worthington and CG Arnie at least made it enjoyable.
JetBlackPanda said:So does anyone else really want a Neytiri figure or statue? I would love one on my desk!
I searched around and found that sideshow collectibles are working on one:
here is a link to an early scan of the figure:
http://www.cote-a-cas.net/site2/images/News_images_coteacas/News_Site/Sideshow/121709avatar01.jpg
looks great so far, but I think it might cost a little to much.
Watching all the Terminators as well. The scene when T1000 pursuits with the liquid nitrogen truck is too goodkoam said:I'm not sure TS is better than T3. I'm watching all the terminators back to back right now and T3 is a lot better than I remember it being. (I haven't done TS yet).
Terminator 2 is one helluva movie. Still the best action movie of all time. There are so many memorable moments.
My favorite scene ever is when Sarah is in the mental institute and she's the most powerful women in the world. Then she escapes runs down the hall, sees Arnie and collapses as if she's nothing. Such a powerful moment.
I also love the scene in the extended cut where she's pushing against the fence by the playground, the bomb hits and everyone burns to a crisp.
The T-800 during the intro scene is still scary looking, it feels like its looking into your soul. :lol
chubigans said:By the way, I totally didn't notice Neytiri was completely topless in a few scenes until my second viewing.
Huh.
Pimpwerx said:Just got back from it.
Meh.
It's a beautiful and immersive movie, but it's hella long. The last time I started rubbing my eyes in a movie was during the first LOTR. This movie is about an hour too long. Even being generous, it's half an hour too long. It's a nice story, but I really feel like the hype for this movie is unwarranted. Like Titanic, this is a one-shot for me. I don't see any return appeal of even a Star Wars prequel. I can watch those for mindless action, but Avatar doesn't really even have that.
I will say I felt like I got my $10 worth. It's nice to come out of a movie feeling like I was served a good product. I just don't get some of the hysteria. Not to come off too negative. I can't let runtime put such a dent in a movie. Good movie, just too damn long. PEACE.
Oh, they're there in more than a few scenes. I'm actually not sure how Cameron didn't get a MPAA tag for nudity, unless alien bewbz don't count.chubigans said:By the way, I totally didn't notice Neytiri was completely topless in a few scenes until my second viewing.
Huh.
I doubt BA will have a R-rating, considering the source material. And the fact cameron stated earlier that he was aiming for a PG-13 rating IIRC.GhaleonEB said:+Cameron, sci-fi, R-rating. Which is enough to sell me before the other stuff.
Lafiel said:I doubt BA will have a R-rating, considering the source material. And the fact cameron stated earlier that he was aiming for a PG-13 rating IIRC.
Can you link me a article that confirms this.gdt5016 said:Nope.
R.
Solo said:Also, how funny is it that 7 months after McG's crappy movie in Cameron's old franchise comes out, Cameron releases a new movie that makes TS nothing more than a footnote in history?
Lafiel said:I doubt BA will have a R-rating, considering the source material. And the fact cameron stated earlier that he was aiming for a PG-13 rating IIRC.
Lafiel said:I doubt BA will have a R-rating, considering the source material.
Snaku said:You're either completely unfamiliar with Gunnm/Battle Angel, or you're fucking nuts. Not to mention Cameron has stated repeatedly that Gally would be topless during much of the film (will be interesting to see where the MPAA stands on nipple-less 14-year-old cyborg breasts).
Oh really? I'll have to catch that on the next viewin'.GhaleonEB said:Oh, they're there in more than a few scenes. I'm actually not sure how Cameron didn't get a MPAA tag for nudity, unless alien bewbz don't count.
I wasn't saying it should land an R rating, just an MPAA note. Avatar is rated PG-13 for:BigDug13 said:Just showing breasts doesn't land you am R rating. Milla got topless 2 or 3 times in the fifth element and that was PG13
Smoking gets a mention, but no nudity.Rated PG-13 for intense epic battle sequences and warfare, sensuality, language and some smoking.
Heh, gotta love those free-flowing clothes of hers.Dead said:Cameron said they had to edit out some tit shots from Avatar to keep it PG-13 due to the free flowing software effect they had on Neytiri's "clothes"
I really hope he does some smaller films after he gets these blockbusters out of his system. Somersault has his best performance to date. Kind of a blah movie, but he really nailed the character.The Storyteller said:I love Worthington though, I still remember his role in Gettin' Square way back in 2003 (although he was overshadowed a lot by David Wenham hilarious performance, he still managed to impress) and then his bit role in Love My Way. Cant believe he has shot to stardom so fast.
JetBlackPanda said:So does anyone else really want a Neytiri figure or statue? I would love one on my desk!
I searched around and found that sideshow collectibles are working on one:
here is a link to an early scan of the figure:
http://www.cote-a-cas.net/site2/images/News_images_coteacas/News_Site/Sideshow/121709avatar01.jpg
looks great so far, but I think it might cost a little to much.
chubigans said:By the way, I totally didn't notice Neytiri was completely topless in a few scenes until my second viewing.
Huh.
Never forgetBlablurn said:just re-read some of sculli's first avatar threads :lol it's quite funny to read all the statements from some years ago. and i have to admit that i didn't pay attention for a long time about his threads. i always clicked on them but the lack of pictures or videos was quite disappointing. but it's awesome if you read something like "this will be an event/experience no one should miss" - and it turned out this article was right after all.
ToxicAdam said:
![]()
Wow, that looks really shitty. No matter how much I'm anticipating Cameron's new movie this artworks sucks for being so generic.
WETA huh? I don't have much hope for the visual effects of Avatar then...
:lolToxicAdam said:
Sixteen months ago, and he was right on the money.Katzenberg said:3D is an experience that for most folks can not really be duplicated at home with the effect it has in a movie theater. And when you have films like MONSTERS VS ALIENS coming in the format youll see what I mean. The big one will be AVATAR and Katzenberg has seen some of James Camerons mysterious film in 3D and he believes it will singlehandedly revolutionize the business. It will be THE experience to experience and Jeffreys campaign in many ways isnt just about getting enough screens to do MONSTERS VS ALIENS but to pave the way for AVATAR which will convert the unconverted
Snaku said:Screw this bloated, preachy, over hyped pos. Give me the real Avatar movie!
So I guess this really WAS early concept art. Its got the stripes, the 4 fingers and toes. The end of the tail seems like it could be the Qeue for bonding as well.Blablurn said:
AlteredBeast said:I am part of the problem. This movie is a solid 6.5/10. If this didn't have James Cameron associated with it nor 99.9% of the movie utilizing some kind of CG, this would be just another movie.
You fucking nerds duped me again.
ToxicAdam said:Hahah .... you fell for our ruse.
Go rent Juno and play ICO next!
Dead said:So I guess this really WAS early concept art. Its got the stripes, the 4 fingers and toes. The end of the tail seems like it could be the Qeue for bonding as well.
Ah, right. Didn't think of that.Scullibundo said:Nah, Cameron debunked it. He described the Na'vi in detail in the original treatment which somebody obviously designed that piece around.
haha, so angryAlteredBeast said:The Hurt Locker only did $16 million worldwide
Fucking nerds...