• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

RTTP: Batman Begins (The only Batman movie to really understand the character)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Preface: I hate Burton Batman. Watched Batman `89, thought it was awful and not the least of its problems was that it completely misunderstood who the Batman was as a character. I've always stated that The Dark Knight is my favorite Batman movie, and while it is a better film than BB overall, it isn't as good of a Batman movie. I also like TDKR, more than most people, but I do recognize its flaws and rank it lower than the other two Nolan Batman movies. I haven't watched Batman Returns or any of the other 90s movies, but as none of those movies outside of Returns are highly regarded I doubt anybody would blame me for skipping them.

Intro: The problem, as I see it, with mainstream Batman, is that very few people truly understand the character. It's been portrayed many ways, and I think who the modern day Batman is as a character has been really hurt, first by the Adam West Batman TV show and subsequent movie, then by The Dark Knight Returns (in a fashion, more later), and by Burton Batman. While the 60s TV show wasn't bad in any way, it focused on Batman as the character was of the time--a more lighthearted and campy take on the character. This isn't bad in any case--it's who Batman was in a time when comics were put under more scrutiny and they were still heavily aimed at children. But that isn't who the character is anymore, in part due to Dark Knight Returns. And while DKR made the character who he is today in many ways, it is due to the darkness and the brutal actions of that Batman that many see him as a man who tortures and is only slightly better than the criminals he fights, and this was not helped by Burton Batman, in which he flat out kills people, and where much of the movie (Batman '89, have not watched Returns) focuses on how psychologically unstable Bruce Wayne is. In Dark Knight Returns, we can see that incarnation as a result of Frank Miller himself--All Star Batman and Robin cemented this, with the birth of the "goddamn Batman." With the Burton movies, this can be attributed to Burton himself--he's stated in the past that he does not enjoy comics, and even called making comic movies equivalent to "Chinese water torture."

Who is the Batman?: The Batman today is one of many ideals. Many know of his one rule, but they may not fully understand why he even has this rule. It hearkens back to his more campy days, where he's just a guy in a costume, and this is where the Miller works cause problems. DKR, All Star Batman, and similar work depicts a dark and furious Batman, obsessed with hurting crime and avenging the death of the Wayne parents. But that's only part of the Batman. Batman may be a dark and brooding figure, but he is also one of hope. Hope that a single man can stand up for justice in a crime-ridden city. Hope that that Gotham can look up to and see the Bat symbol, driving fear into criminals who are killing the city. Hope that Gotham can become something greater without being dragged down by the criminals who plague it. A symbol that a single man without any superpowers can stand alongside the gods of the Justice League, and when push comes to shove, even outdo and disarm them when the type comes. He doesn't do this job for himself; he does it to save his city. He isn't some madman dressing up and attacking people; he realizes that by driving fear into the criminal underworld, he is able to create a powerful myth the everyperson can trust in and the everycriminal can be afraid of. He is Batman.

Batman Begins understands this: With BB, there is a very good understanding of the character at play that doesn't really appear in other movies, even the Nolan ones. Gotham itself is probably the closest to the comics and the best it appears in any other media format: it's a dark and crime ridden city, with some Gothic architecture and a feel that the city itself is stuck in a 90s that it desperately tries to grow out of but can't seem to make it. The Wayne tower at the center of the city represents the guardian family of the city, and it doesn't focus on unrealistic gothic architecture like the 90s Batman movies did or go too far into the modern city aesthetic like the other Nolan movies. The film opens with Wayne's chase around the world for training, looking for a meaning in life after he finds he has no meaning in life, and by being taken under the arm of Ra's al Ghul he's able to get the skills he need. Through flashbacks we see who Joe Chill really was, and this itself is something even Gotham, the recent TV show completely missed--Joe Chill isn't anybody special. He's just some normal guy who's been pushed too far and become too desperate. He's a stand in for Gotham itself, a city struggling to keep it together and pushed to do unspeakable things just to survive. Once Wayne returns to Gotham, he begins his quest and unlike some mediums where Alfred objects to his actions, Alfred actually helps and guide him, only stepping in to tell him to hold back when things go a bit too far and Bruce needed a guiding hand.


I could go on describing how well and in the many, many ways that the movie truly understands the character but I just realized it's nearly 1:00 AM and I need to get up at 6:30 tomorrow. TL;DR Dark Knight might be the better film just as a film, but the only movie that really understands Batman is Batman Begins.
 

Shaanyboi

Banned
I haven't watched Batman Returns or any of the other 90s movies, but as none of those movies outside of Returns are highly regarded I doubt anybody would blame me for skipping them.

Batman literally straps a bomb to a dude's chest, smiles like an asshole, and knocks him down a manhole. He walks away as the dude blows up behind him.

...Yeah Burton doesn't know jack fucking shit about Batman beyond the imagery. Not to mention Batman is barely in the movie, is a complete non-character beyond wanting to bone Michelle Pfeiffer and not trusting Penguin for no real reason beyond... he doesn't trust Penguin.

That movie is dogshit.
 

liquidtmd

Banned
The wonderful and enduring thing about Batman as a character is that he will forever be many things to many people.

The take that the characters essence is the symbol of fear and the ability to create a legend or icon bigger than any one man is just one interpretation. Saying 'this one piece of work truly understands the character' kinda misses the point.

Ultimately Batman is a token hero blank slate metaphor for the reader to project on. Whether the wannabe hero in the reader secretly opines to be playboy Christian Bale shagging ballet dancers and fighting crime, lusts to be a brooding mentalist ala Michael Keaton, or to be a tight wearing camp gay icon akin to Adam West beating off sharks - it's up to them
 
Quick check before I went to sleep--I'm not counting animated movies, because that includes straight up adaptions of comic arcs and other things, which just complicates things.
 
I really loved the aesthetic of Gotham in Begins. The grimy Blade Runner influence was a great fit for Batman. As much as I love TDK, I think it's a shame Nolan never went back to that look in the sequels.

tumblr_nq0532yA481uve83to5_500.gif


 
I really loved the aesthetic of Gotham in Begins. The grimy Blade Runner influence was a great fit for Batman. As much as I love TDK, I think it's a shame Nolan never went back to that look in the sequels.
I think the point of that was to show the city was healing and getting better, by the beginning of TDKR, Batman has effectively won.
 
Quick check before I went to sleep--I'm not counting animated movies, because that includes straight up adaptions of comic arcs and other things, which just complicates things.

Not including the others is fine, but Mask of the Phantasm was a wholly original film that released in the cinema.
 

Ushojax

Should probably not trust the 7-11 security cameras quite so much
I really loved the aesthetic of Gotham in Begins. The grimy Blade Runner influence was a great fit for Batman. As much as I love TDK, I think it's a shame Nolan never went back to that look in the sequels.

tumblr_nq0532yA481uve83to5_500.gif

He didn't go back to it because the setting of the story moved from the slums of the Narrows to the rest of Gotham. Batman went from a guy who talks to hobos by the docks, to someone trying to take on organised crime at the heart of the city.

The actual city of Gotham looks pretty much the same in all 3 movies, it's just the story progressing. From the shadows of the Narrows, Batman becomes a symbol to the whole of Gotham.
 

Shaanyboi

Banned
I think the point of that was to show the city was healing and getting better, by the beginning of TDKR, Batman has effectively won.

It's kinda the fascinating thing about Nolan's trilogy, in that he did something no one else has really done in a live-action superhero movie - he gave that character an ending. In comics, Gotham maybe goes through "phases" depending on the artist and writer duo, etc. But it's always going to be Gotham. It's always going to be the urban nightmare, the open wound of western civilization.

But Nolan gave us a story of "what if Batman actually made a quantifiable difference?" What if we weren't shackled by the notion of maintaining status quo to allow for continuation, but rather what if we could see the effect he was making on the world around him?
 

Skunkers

Member
Batman literally straps a bomb to a dude's chest, smiles like an asshole, and knocks him down a manhole. He walks away as the dude blows up behind him.

...Yeah Burton doesn't know jack fucking shit about Batman beyond the imagery. Not to mention Batman is barely in the movie, is a complete non-character beyond wanting to bone Michelle Pfeiffer and not trusting Penguin for no real reason beyond... he doesn't trust Penguin.

That movie is dogshit.

In Batman Begins, Bruce refuses to kill the criminal when asked by the League. He blows up the entire building instead, definitely gets Ra's clone killed and several ninjas are blown up on screen.

=p

If we include TDK and TDKR, he also trains for 8 years to be the Batman and pretty much immediately wants to quit being Batman because vagina. And he does quit being Batman for several years when she dies only to return one last turn and then retire. Dude was actually the Batman for like what, a few months between all the movies?

Oh, and remember the part in TDK where Joker throws Rachel off the building in the party, and Batman jumps out the window and saves her? Do you remember the part after that where he went back upstairs to stop the Joker? You don't? Oh that's right, that's because he totally fucking left the Joker up there with an entire party full of innocent bystanders. Saved the girl though.

We've yet to get a true Batman film yet, I'm kinda hopeful for Synder's version though.
 

z0m3le

Banned
Pretty much this

Yep and capping off Batman Adventures, which is the best look at batman we have yet gotten, even if it was a children's show. I also really like Batman Beyond's Bruce Wayne because it does feel like a continuation of this Batman, I just wish they hadn't messed with Terry's back story.

I think Batman Begins leads into The Dark Knight perfectly, because when Batman has to deal with the Joker, those themes are always there and becomes very pure in this sense, I'd also like to point out that a large portion of what makes batman so appealing is the joker and his gallery of villains, Joker and Batman are perfect opposites that explore the other so deeply that it really goes beyond any other pairing in comics.
 

NEO0MJ

Member
Speaking of characters origins, why did Batman stick to the no kill rule after the regulations on comics ended?
 

Dommo

Member
I'm not sure how The Dark Knight doesn't understand the character. It takes everything that's been established in BB and builds on top of it. It doesn't contradict or betray that character in anyway. He's still a product of his environment. Joe Chill (as you nicely put, a stand-in for Gotham itself) is still the reason Batman's Batman. Nothing's contradicting that change.

A symbol of hope is a key goal Bruce is striving towards in the film, only this time he's doing it (and by extension, the film is doing it) in a far more mature way: Bruce realises that going out at night and physically beating the shit out of his enemies will only help so far until there's the inevitable push-back. That's precisely what we experience in TDK - the realization that while a symbol of hope is a positive thing, running into the night as a one-man lawbringer isn't actually going to result in a net gain. And such, The Joker, as an antagonistic force, is the direct result of Batman.

Batman recognises this, and he rightly realises that Harvey Dent is in fact the symbol of hope Gotham needs. Harvey Dent shares a countless many of the same qualities as Bruce, but is able to fight crime on a more effective level. To me, this is consistent, and an extension, of what you've written in the OP.

And even if it's not true to the character, whatever that means, considering the countless number of iterations there are, it's a more interesting take on the character, I think, which, as you've even stated, results in the best Batman film put to screen. That's really all that matters at the end of the day: is the film telling an interesting, thought provoking story? Yes? Then it doesn't really matter what came before.
 
I think the point of that was to show the city was healing and getting better, by the beginning of TDKR, Batman has effectively won.

He didn't go back to it because the setting of the story moved from the slums of the Narrows to the rest of Gotham. Batman went from a guy who talks to hobos by the docks, to someone trying to take on organised crime at the heart of the city.

The actual city of Gotham looks pretty much the same in all 3 movies, it's just the story progressing. From the shadows of the Narrows, Batman becomes a symbol to the whole of Gotham.

That makes sense, and I'm aware that it took place in the poorer part of the city as well as the fact that It also helps set each film apart. I just think Nolan and Nathan Crowley's design for the Narrows really nailed the look of a realistic Gotham that's faithful to the hopelessness it embodies in the comics and other media.
 
Batman literally straps a bomb to a dude's chest, smiles like an asshole, and knocks him down a manhole. He walks away as the dude blows up behind him.

4065113-2215848232-batma.gif


Best Batman.

I don't really care if the Burton movies "didn't understand the character" or whatever that means. I understood Keaton's Batman just fine, and that's all I need.
 

z0m3le

Banned
That makes sense, and I'm aware that it took place in the poorer part of the city as well as the fact that It also helps set each film apart. I just think Nolan and Nathan Crowley's design for the Narrows really nailed the look of a realistic Gotham that's faithful to the hopelessness it embodies in the comics and other media.

The Dark Knight though is more like "The Empire Strikes Back" in that after it looks like Batman and hope has won, that along comes Joker and the eventual strike back from evil/chaos that Batman sought to fight, and the true death of Batman's hope in the birth of Two Face.

It is the type of thing you can only really do once, which is why the dark knight rises is in part such an inferior movie, it doesn't tear down the work that batman has done, but rather kicks a man while he is down.
 

XAL

Member
I don't really care if the Burton movies "didn't understand the character" or whatever that means. I understood Keaton's Batman just fine, and that's all I need.

Burton never cared for Batman, it was just a playground for him to make movies around over the top Burton-y villains that wear white makeup.

I mean, the Oswald Cobblepot in Returns is a fucking fish person. Wat.

None of the pre-Batman Begins films have Batman as the central focus of the story (in a meaningful, faithful way). They more revolve around the villains more than anything.
 

Sojgat

Member
Nope. One of the main reasons those movies are so bad is because Goyer and Nolan don't understand Batman at all. I guess it's just easier to relate to a character if he isn't actually exceptional in any way.

My favourite part is when, after being Batman for like five minutes, he's willing to give up his crusade to be with Rachel, but she's like "Nah, Gotham needs you and shit, weirdo."
 

Sanjuro

Member
Best Batman.

Best Soundtrack.

Nope. One of the main reasons those movies are so bad is because Goyer and Nolan don't understand Batman at all. I guess it's just easier to relate to a character if he isn't actually exceptional in any way.

My favourite part is when, after being Batman for like five minutes, he's willing to give up his crusade to be with Rachel, but she's like "Nah, Gotham needs you and shit, weirdo."

Batman just drives to Gotham and back to his cave.
 

Dabanton

Member
Burtons disdain for Superheros in general sours any of his Batman movies for me.

I adore Batman Begins. Everything. Aesthetics,mood, and setup is near perfect for a film Batman.

It feels like a city under siege. Love that scene where Bruce goes to confront Falcone in the restaurant you get a real feel of a city suffocated silently by crime.

Think it may be time for a rewatch of BB today :D
 

Rogan

Banned
Going to give it to the Dark Knight.

Loved it more than Batman Begins, I also don't understand how Batman Begins is god tier according to movieGAF.
 
Intro: The problem, as I see it, with mainstream Batman, is that very few people truly understand the character. It's been portrayed many ways, and I think who the modern day Batman is as a character has been really hurt, first by the Adam West Batman TV show and subsequent movie, then by The Dark Knight Returns (in a fashion, more later), and by Burton Batman. While the 60s TV show wasn't bad in any way, it focused on Batman as the character was of the time--a more lighthearted and campy take on the character. This isn't bad in any case--it's who Batman was in a time when comics were put under more scrutiny and they were still heavily aimed at children. But that isn't who the character is anymore, in part due to Dark Knight Returns.

Doesn't this undermine the OPs premise. How can something understand a character more when that character has admitedly changed?
 
Batman Begins first hour is godlike. It0s as good as anything ever made in big US blockbuster. It's not even a movie. It's more of an inspiration/motivational reel.

The cross-cutting through time and locations is nothing less than extraordinary , and a clear example how a superhero movie should not be looked upon was a mere vehicle for action redundancy and low technique.

And its suit is pretty much perfect.

tumblr_mz5yun9FoB1qklq7jo4_400.gif

tumblr_mz5yun9FoB1qklq7jo3_400.gif

tumblr_mz5yun9FoB1qklq7jo1_400.gif


Sadly , the second part follows a little more closely some of the trappings of the genre itself , takings some of the bright shine of the movie. Nolan ended up reshaping and deflected those limitations in the other two pics ,

As for what is Batman , there are many different iterations. People who complain about some of Nolan's ideas about him , seem more like fans who probably only read something after Miller's work with character. They actually follow pretty closely some of the main concepts behind it. There's not 1 understanding of a character with such latitude. What there is in Begins , TDK and Rises is a very coherent expression of what is Bruce Wayne , how the Batman persona kinda percolates him with time and the effects it has on him and the ones who surround him.
 

Baraka in the White House

2-Terms of Kombat
Batman literally straps a bomb to a dude's chest, smiles like an asshole, and knocks him down a manhole. He walks away as the dude blows up behind him.

...Yeah Burton doesn't know jack fucking shit about Batman beyond the imagery. Not to mention Batman is barely in the movie, is a complete non-character beyond wanting to bone Michelle Pfeiffer and not trusting Penguin for no real reason beyond... he doesn't trust Penguin.

That movie is dogshit.

There's a sizable subset of GAF who insists that Returns is the best Batman movie.

I don't fucking get it. It's barely even a Batman movie. It's mostly just Burton going all Baz Lerhman on Gotham. His disdain for the genre is obvious.
 
I have my issues with Batman Begins and it's not a film I pull off the shelf to watch too often. But I'm very grateful for it and for what it did for Batman movies and for comic book films in general.
 

Shaanyboi

Banned
You should see Returns for the best Catwoman / Selina Kyle, though.

TlK63EvSQlC3joA3Zja.gif

Pfeiffer goes hard on that role, and she does well, but nah... Her going "I need to take a bath" and then starts doing this?

a7dcc552caccaa97679808f9ccb86839.jpg


She has a lot of great moments, but her actually fucking thinking she's a cat at moments? Becoming Catwoman because... cats nibbled on her? Like... no. Pfeiffer shines despite of Burton, not because of him.

There's a sizable subset of GAF who insists that Returns is the best Batman movie.

I don't fucking get it. It's barely even a Batman movie. It's mostly just Burton going all Baz Lerhman on Gotham. His disdain for the genre is obvious.

Burton was more fascinated by "the freaks" than he was in Batman. He maybe liked the imagery, but anything about the actual character, he seemed completely disinterested in. The "formula" was clear by Returns in that each movie was going to be sold by the gimmick of the villains (which wtf did he do with them in Returns btw?), not because of the titular character. No one should be defending Returns. It's a fascinating trainwreck, but a trainwreck all the same.


I'm glad Burton did what he did, I think it's important we find how far we can squash and stretch characters, but that's been done now and I'd rather have movies from people that seem interested in portraying and celebrating the actual core of these characters rather than expressing some bitter disdain and disinterest in them.
 
I really loved the aesthetic of Gotham in Begins. The grimy Blade Runner influence was a great fit for Batman. As much as I love TDK, I think it's a shame Nolan never went back to that look in the sequels.

tumblr_nq0532yA481uve83to5_500.gif

I get the love for the grimy look but some times it just looks cliched to me. I liked the feel that TDK's city was metropolitan and modern, but seeped in underlying corruption and backdoor bureaucracies that withheld it from thriving. It also made me want to visit Chicago someday.
 
he also trains for 8 years to be the Batman and pretty much immediately wants to quit being Batman because vagina.
I thought he quit because he saw Batman as a necessary evil who had completed his task, and wanted to leave the city in the hands of normal citizens like his father, thereby assuaging his guilt of participating in the premature death of his father. But then again I watched the movies.
 
Yes I always liked how they made Bruce's nobility and selflessness part of his blood - taught by example by his parents and that bit about his ancestors using the caves under the manor to rescue slaves (or something like that).
 
Pretty sure Returns is the only Batman film to recognise that Batman is far more than a simple persona/idea to Bruce Wayne.
 
I thought he quit because he saw Batman as a necessary evil who had completed his task, and wanted to leave the city in the hands of normal citizens like his father, thereby assuaging his guilt of participating in the premature death of his father. But then again I watched the movies.

There we go. Understands schmunderstands (holy crap that looks stupid when typed out lol) I think nolans movies got the jist of the character quite well

Not to mention imo The Dark Knight has the best representation of Harvey Dent in any medium yet. People will just say Rachel (yet again) was a weak reason for his anger but that's just on the surface. His dissatisfaction with the law's fairness is hinted at well before that

I also quite like batman and returns. Comic fans need to get over it tbh. If a bunch of books can have such wildly different interpretations of certain characters I don't see why films can't either. Especially if they turn out well made
 
If we include TDK and TDKR, he also trains for 8 years to be the Batman and pretty much immediately wants to quit being Batman because vagina.

Seeing his life-long childhood friend and love blown to pieces and being partly responsible seems a funny definition of the word 'vagina' here. I feel like i'm reading a Kevin Smith podcast or something.
 

LionPride

Banned
I feel as if Begins was the best Batman movie of the trilogy. TDK was the best movie of the trilogy and Rises was a good movie overall.
 
Whether it "understands" Batman or not, it's still a movie about a ninja whose ninja leader wants to murder everyone in an entire metropolitan city to fight against corruption. And the movie takes itself seriously.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
Best Batman film of the bunch. Love it.
 
Whether it "understands" Batman or not, it's still a movie about a ninja whose ninja leader wants to murder everyone in an entire metropolitan city to fight against corruption. And the movie takes itself seriously.

Reducing anything like that makes it sound ridiculous. That's no grounds for dismissal.
 

Screaming Meat

Unconfirmed Member
The wonderful and enduring thing about Batman as a character is that he will forever be many things to many people.

There it is. No one interpretation of the character is correct. My favourite thing about Batman is how malleable the myth is. all it takes are a few key ingredients and you have yourself a Batman story. The joy comes from seeing where the writer/artist/filmmaker/whatever takes it.

I wonder if Miller actually ruined Batman.

Since DKR, fans only accept a psychotic prep god.

Arguably he saved it from forever being associated solely with Adam West. I say that as a fan of Adam West too. That was a creative deadend till Miller breathed life into the character.

4065113-2215848232-batma.gif


Best Batman.

I don't really care if the Burton movies "didn't understand the character" or whatever that means. I understood Keaton's Batman just fine, and that's all I need.

Definitely my favourite live-action Batman.
 

Renekton

Member
Whether it "understands" Batman or not, it's still a movie about a ninja whose ninja leader wants to murder everyone in an entire metropolitan city to fight against corruption. And the movie takes itself seriously.
Football is about sweaty men chasing a wet round object.
 
4065113-2215848232-batma.gif


Best Batman.

I don't really care if the Burton movies "didn't understand the character" or whatever that means. I understood Keaton's Batman just fine, and that's all I need.

Yeah, I agree. I don't care if that Batman uses the flames that shoot out of his car to set a clown on fire, Returns is really great.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom