• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

RTX 5090 Review Thread

Gubaldo

Member
First review is Up
tomshardware italy posted review

https://www.tomshw.it/hardware/nvidia-rtx-5090-test-recensione

Raster:
RTX-5090-FE---Benchmark-giochi---4K-Raster---Cyberpunk-2077.png


RTX-5090-FE---Benchmark-giochi---4K-Raster---Dragon-Age-Veilguard.png


RTX-5090-FE---Benchmark-giochi---4K-Raster---Horizon-Zero-Dawn.png




In classic rasterization, the RTX 5090 is, on average, 28% faster than the RTX 4090 and 72% faster than the RTX 4080 SUPER.

RT:
RTX-5090-FE---Benchmark-giochi---4K-RT-DLSS---Cyberpunk-2077.png


RTX-5090-FE---Benchmark-giochi---4K-RT-DLSS---Dragon-Age-Veilguard.png


RTX-5090-FE---Benchmark-giochi---4K-RT-DLSS---Hogwarts-Legacy.png

This is where the RTX 5090 shines, at least in games with DLSS 4 support: performance is more than doubled compared to the 4090 where there is Multi Frame Generation, allowing you to play Cyberpunk 2077 in 4K at an average of 325 FPS, Star Wars Outlaws at over 220 FPS with path tracing, or Alan Wake 2 at an average of 180 FPS, again with path tracing enabled.

in titles with the old frame generation , however, the gap between RTX 5090 and RTX 4090 is much closer to what was recorded in rasterization: on average we detected a + 25%.



TECHPOWERUP:
Pros:

  • ncredible performance
  • DLSS 4 Frame Generation and Transformers Upscaling
  • Compact dual-slot design
  • 32 GB VRAM
  • Highly energy-efficient
  • Idle fan-stop
  • Support for HDMI 2.1 & DisplayPort 2.1
  • PCI-Express 5.0
  • Good video encode/decode hardware acceleration support
Cons:
  • Very expensive
  • Very high idle/multi-monitor/video playback power consumption
  • Fans are "not quiet" during gaming
  • Memory overclocking artificially limited by the driver
relative-performance-3840-2160.png



 
Last edited:
so <30% faster on average than its predecessor.

And that is with an updated architecture and node, and with 30% higher tdp and CU count.


In other words: Pretty much zero technological progress outside of AI functionality.

Better hope for TSMC to provide a very meaty node shrink for the 6xxx gen or else all we`ll get going forward is more fake frames........
 
Last edited:
More than the numbers, im curious about the opinions on the image quality with FG and MFG enabled, specially with the new DLSS 4 and Ray Reconstruction hmm
 

winjer

Member
so <30% faster on average than its predecessor.

And that is with an updated architecture and node, and with 30% higher tdp and CU count.


In other words: Pretty much zero technological progress outside of AI functionality.

Better hope for TSMC to provide a very meaty node shrink for the 6xxx gen or else all we`ll get going forward is more fake frames........

It also uses the N4 node. So even that is the same "old" tech.
 
25-30% more gains
30% more TDP
30% higher price.

Overall performance is good, but in line with what one would expect.

I'd love to see this in a card with 50% less TDP. I'm probably in the minority here but the less heat/electric waste, the better. Maybe once we get 2 nm process chips?
 
Last edited:

Spukc

always chasing the next thrill
Should be $1500. $2000 is a farce.
nah easy 6K to weed out the peasants :messenger_tears_of_joy: ™️
Like be honest here if your current pc setup is sub 5k are you even better then a mobile phone gamer? :pie_thinking:🤔
 
Last edited:

Bojji

Member
25% for $2,000 lmao. And we were making fun of ps5 pro offering only 45% more performance for $700. God does exist and he’s a Sony fanboy out for revenge.

Looks like moore’s law is in full effect. It’s affecting everyone from Sony to amd and nvidia.

You have 1:1 with price/performance increase. With Pro you are paying 75%/2x more (depending on place) for UP to 45% performance increase (average ~30%).

Pro is a shitty deal, 5090 is very mediocre deal.
 
Last edited:

DirtInUrEye

Member
I'm occasionally quite silly with money and my missus wouldn't even moan at me if I wanted to get one, but I'm staying with my existing card and skipping the gen. The radical improvements to DLSS3 make this a non issue, so thanks for that Nvidia.
 
Last edited:

Draugoth

Gold Member
Really wanted to post this one but OP at least saved me from the trouble

About the card.. There's no way people wil be getting this at $2000 MSRP, there's multiple reports this will be extremely limited at launch, incluiding from a an acquitance of mine
 
If I could get a FE at MSRP, I might consider it, but by the time I've met my obligations and have some extra cash to spend, I'd bet by March/April timeframe, they'll almost certainly be sold out/gone and probably not worth the effort/stress of trying to hunt one down.

My 3080ti is still holding strong and is finally getting to stretch it's arms after getting a 9800x3d after being chained to the 9700k for so long. Maybe I'll try and get a 4090 someone is trying to offload for cheap.
 
Last edited:

analog_future

Resident Crybaby
Going to do everything I can to get a 5090 FE at launch or one of the $2199 cards at launch. Won't pay more than that.


If I can't get one of those at launch, I'll keep at it until I do get one.
 

scydrex

Member
25% for $2,000 lmao. And we were making fun of ps5 pro offering only 45% more performance for $700. God does exist and he’s a Sony fanboy out for revenge.

Looks like moore’s law is in full effect. It’s affecting everyone from Sony to amd and nvidia.
25% more average in raster for 25% price increase or $400 more. Don't forget the 2tb ssd of the pro.
 
Last edited:

Gubaldo

Member
TECHPOWERUP:
Pros:

  • ncredible performance
  • DLSS 4 Frame Generation and Transformers Upscaling
  • Compact dual-slot design
  • 32 GB VRAM
  • Highly energy-efficient
  • Idle fan-stop
  • Support for HDMI 2.1 & DisplayPort 2.1
  • PCI-Express 5.0
  • Good video encode/decode hardware acceleration support
Cons:
  • Very expensive
  • Very high idle/multi-monitor/video playback power consumption
  • Fans are "not quiet" during gaming
  • Memory overclocking artificially limited by the driver
relative-performance-3840-2160.png
 

STARSBarry

Gold Member
25-30% more gains
30% more TDP
30% higher price.

Overall performance is good, but in line with what one would expect.

I'd love to see this in a card with 50% less TDP. I'm probably in the minority here but the less heat/electric waste, the better. Maybe once we get 2 nm process chips?

I think we need a gen like this to reset the clock... normally we had one every other generation but since the RTX cards came out we have effectively never had one, and it shows.

RTX 2000, 3000, 4000 and now 5000 have all focussed on performance (AI in this gen) that has resulted in ever increasing power and heat margins.
 
Last edited:

SweetTooth

Gold Member
Please, not this shit again.
He bringed Pro here, not me lol.

ST and JSF will be here soon.


Excuse me?! I will just quote myself from 2 months ago, and I won't swarm every 5090 threads like you did with Pro
45% performance uplift in $700 console : what a ripoff! Where is the stand!

45% performance uplift in $2000 GPU: Take my wallet!!

Lots of users will be exposed soon

Jesus I was generous with my expectation for 5090..lol
 

analog_future

Resident Crybaby
This doesn't look like a new generation of GPUs.
This is more like a 4090 ti.

Hardware progress has reached it's limits IMO. When factoring in size, power draw, and heat constraints that need to be considered for home use, we aren't going to be able to push it much further than this. Expect more and more of a focus on software/AI improvements moving forward.
 

diffusionx

Gold Member
That's basically zero gen on gen improvement.
they can't really shrink these things like they used to, this is going to be how it is going forward.

I'm not even sure how feasible new GPUs are going to be. At some point it's like, you cant make PSUs that draw more power.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom