Maybe they will let him take the kicks in the second half given how abysmal Foley has been.
Im predicting us to get steamrolled second half. Aussies will be getting a bollocking right now and will be coming out with a rocket up their arse (not literally I hope)
If we are as good at the breakdown in the second half as we were in the first, crazy things could happen.Our confidence will be high so if we can just hang in there we have a chance.
Option 1 is clearly the best option. 9 times out of 10 successful mauls are collapsed anyway as concceding the penalty is the best option.Not least because we can't defend it, but fuck me driving mauls are a blight on the game under the current rule of "we know it's obstruction but what are you going to do about it."
There's not a lot of good options to stop it though
The three proposed have been
1. allow the maul to be collapsed (this was tried back in 2009 and was pretty successful but the IRB were worried about injuries even though no injuries were recorded due to the change during the international trial)
2 . Change the rule for the maul to be legal that the ball must be carried at the front of the maul to allow the defence access to the ball.
and the most radical of all which would change union
3. Change it so that the gain from penalty kicks to touch is only territorial. In other words the opposition would have the throw-in this would essentially eliminate most of the opportunity of the mauls. Essentially kicking to touch from a penalty would be a free kick.
Not least because we can't defend it, but fuck me driving mauls are a blight on the game under the current rule of "we know it's obstruction but what are you going to do about it."
There's not a lot of good options to stop it though
The three proposed have been
1. allow the maul to be collapsed (this was tried back in 2009 and was pretty successful but the IRB were worried about injuries even though no injuries were recorded due to the change during the international trial)
2 . Change the rule for the maul to be legal that the ball must be carried at the front of the maul to allow the defence access to the ball.
and the most radical of all which would change union
3. Change it so that the gain from penalty kicks to touch is only territorial. In other words the opposition would have the throw-in this would essentially eliminate most of the opportunity of the mauls. Essentially kicking to touch from a penalty would be a free kick.
I hate mauls. They are an exploit and nothing more. Make them illegal and the game will get much better.
It's the third scrum collapsing, right?
Fuck me.
Sounds like I need to get home asap going by the radio commentary.