• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Rumor: GeForce RTX 5080 Reportedly Costs Almost the MSRP To Manufacture ($900)

LectureMaster

Gold Member


A Chinese expert who examined 31 RTX 5080 models found that their manufacturing costs are quite high and nearly equal to their MSRP. The price of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5000 series is a subject of constant criticism; however, it turns out that a Chinese reviewer claims this is due to their production costs being ridiculously high.

He further adds that a seller informed him that the RTX 5080’s production costs, including the PCB and components alone, were about 80% of its MSRP. Additionally, the heatsink and graphics packaging would need to be factored in, raising the price by $100.

This means that the profit margins would be significantly lower than anticipated, according to the Chinese supplier, as it would cost an average of $900 to manufacture a single GeForce RTX 5080.


 

LectureMaster

Gold Member
9ni04n.jpg
 

poppabk

Cheeks Spread for Digital Only Future
The price of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5000 series is a subject of constant criticism
The main criticism hasn't been MSRP price except maybe for the 5090 and the 5070 because of its amount of VRAM for that price. It's mainly the lack of availability driving up prices beyond MSRP.
Also press X to doubt.
 
Last edited:

Magic Carpet

Gold Member
I'm reading right now that GDDR7 is only being bought by Nvidia. GDDR6 is less than 20 bucks for 8 GB. A 4090 has 24 GB or 60 bucks in memory.
Where does the other 2 thousand in material go? :)
 

poodaddy

Member
So a 5080, which is only marginally better mind you than a 4080, software features not withstanding, costs nearly three times what the 4080 did to manufacture.....

......uh huh. This is either bullshit, or it's indicative of some much larger issue with the production and fabrication side of Nvidia's cards, (perhaps increases in price of raw minerals used to produce cards since the 40 gen? I don't know), which I honestly doubt, so I'm chalking it up to bullshit.
 

kruis

Exposing the sinister cartel of retailers who allow companies to pay for advertising space.
Bull fucking shit


The 4090 was under 500 to manufacturer and package.


Another thing is that the 50x0 series is manufactured on the same node as its predecessor. The 5080 and 4080 have very comparable specs. The biggest difference is a new RAM type. The idea that Blackwell is crazy expensive to manufacture compared to its predecessor is nonsense.

images
 

CLW

Member
IF true evga smart to get out of the business you can get far better ROI with basic etf investing with virtually ZERO costs
 

lachesis

Member
I don't believe it, and I don't care. It's their (Chipmakers + AIB partners) job to meet the price that people are willing to accept.
They can cry all they want, but I'm not paying for some bloaded price for their "profit margin".
It's not like I'm running charity. They should earn consumer's money with a solid value - not by f'ing cry-me-a-river boo-hoo shit.
If they can't make profit, they should just get out of the business like EVGA did.
 

StereoVsn

Gold Member
Probably an NVIDIA shill. They would happily sell it for $2K if it were that expensive to produce.
Nah, the issue is that Nvidia charges stupid prices for GPU package to AIBs. This is why EVGA couldn’t make it. Nvidia still has their margins.

Hence the non existent margins at MSRP for AIBs and why we are seeing almost no cards at MSRP. The situation is kind of ridiculous and probably also similar for AMD hence the same sort of stupidity with 9070XT.

And of course this is partially due to virtual TSMC monopoly and incompetence on Intel and Samsung’s side. Well, and Nvidia/AMD desire for huge margins (since data center margins are ridiculously large).
 
Last edited:

StereoVsn

Gold Member
My theory is that nvidia is screwing AIBs, and then they are screwing consumers.

Nvidia probably sells chips to them for a high price so they have very thin margins with MSRP price. That's why prices are way higher.
Yep, this is what it is. Cost vs 4080 is a bit more due to TSMC price hike and higher GDDR7 cost, but it’s not a huge increase overall all things considered.

But Nvidia wants to have as large or larger margins so here we are.
 
Last edited:

Hudo

Gold Member
Hard to believe since they reportedly are using the same nodes that they've used for the 4000 series.

That being said, selling a XX80 card for more than $650 is bullshit. And the 5080 especially is pretty unimpressive. And frankly speaking, as a customer, It's not my job to give a flying fuck about how much a product costs to make.
 

NomenNescio

Dual Sense Edger and Blower
This older tech supports physx and "marginally" looks like this to you?

7at1t1d.jpeg


5080 is marginally better than 4080 super, it has nothing on 4090...
That kind of advantage is only present in certain games. Besides, the 4090 is a different tier than the 5080, I don't know why you're so keen in comparing the two. You should be comparing it with the 4080.

And you can kiss goodbye to Physx. It's gone, baby. Obsolete software.
 

Bojji

Member
That kind of advantage is only present in certain games. Besides, the 4090 is a different tier than the 5080, I don't know why you're so keen in comparing the two. You should be comparing it with the 4080.

And you can kiss goodbye to Physx. It's gone, baby. Obsolete software.

Yes, it should be compared with 4080 "family" and it's not much faster.

Knowing how disappointing this launch will be people in Q4 2024 could buy 999$ 4080 Super that is overall very close in power. But they waited and fucked up, 5080 prices are ridiculous and cards are rare.

Physx is dead but games supporting it still work on 4xxx (and below) cards!
 
Top Bottom