sure:Truth101 said:Can you link me to that?
http://twitter.com/#!/pkollar/status/58627307790798848
sure:Truth101 said:Can you link me to that?
The_Darkest_Red said:I was thinking about something like that too. There would be tons of cool potential multiplayer/co-op applications with this kind of setup.
JGS said:That's how I'm picturing it based on speculation (Coffee button is cool lol)
However, it would have to have a grip underneath to function as the Wiimote. Still not sure what the nunchuck would be though.
Fernando Rocker said:Honest questions... could this be possible? Of course, with a lower resolution and everything...
We need to stop coming up with cool ideas, it's only going to make the disappointment hurt more when the controller is something no one predicted at all.thefro said:How about counter-op where the player with the tablet is basically the "dungeon master" working against the other players? That'd be pretty fun even for a casual player if the interface was simple enough and balanced.
The_Darkest_Red said:We need to stop coming up with cool ideas, it's only going to make the disappointment hurt more when the controller is something no one predicted at all.
Now if only they had a game slated for release to clear out the left over controller stock....The_Darkest_Red said:EDIT: I guess the Wii price drop is confirmed now, not sure how fresh that news is. It's almost like Nintendo is gearing up for a fall/winter 2011 hardware launch...
Woffls said:Just had another crazy idea. Let's say P1 has the traditional controller and they're playing Call of Duty X as normal. Now, P2 has the tablet, and what they see is a top down view of the action, and do things like mark targets, move squads and control predator drones.
Would that work? Obviously P2's tablet would be rendering more lightly, maybe dropping stuff like particle effects and extra AA.
Cosmonaut X said:Just out of left field:
Could you integrate pointer functionality in some kind of fingertip attachment? Wire it to the controller, and you can hold a standard-ish pad and still manage to use a pointer.
Or would it be too awkward in practice?
[Nintex] said:Now if only they had a game slated for release to clear out the left over controller stock....
I thought this earlier when looking at the price drop news. They really do seem to be clearing shelves in preparation for a new console to replace it. This supports the suggestion that devs have had kits for 2 years, and doesn't negate the suggestion that they've had them for months, either.The_Darkest_Red said:EDIT: I guess the Wii price drop is confirmed now, not sure how fresh that news is. It's almost like Nintendo is gearing up for a fall/winter 2011 hardware launch...
Woffls said:I thought this earlier when looking at the price drop news. They really do seem to be clearing shelves in preparation for a new console to replace it. This supports the suggestion that devs have had kits for 2 years, and doesn't negate the suggestion that they've had them for months, either.
But to announce a new console that's such a radical change for them merely months away from launch? That's ballsy, even for Nintendo.
EmmanuelMunoz said:Can it PLEASE make coffee? Forget graphics and controls, Espresso is where it's at, even drip would be awesome.
Woffls said:But to announce a new console that's such a radical change for them merely months away from launch? That's ballsy, even for Nintendo.
Woffls said:I thought this earlier when looking at the price drop news. They really do seem to be clearing shelves in preparation for a new console to replace it. This supports the suggestion that devs have had kits for 2 years, and doesn't negate the suggestion that they've had them for months, either.
But to announce a new console that's such a radical change for them merely months away from launch? That's ballsy, even for Nintendo.
The Nintendo Wii 2 launching with the definitive console version of Battlefield 3...Cosmonaut X said:It could be a hell of a move.
Assume they have been in talks with third parties for ages, and assume that they are even just a half-step between the 360/PS3 gen and "next-gen". They should be well-placed to slot into the dev pipeline for all current PS360 multiplats, potentially stealing in with the definitive versions. If they could take a version of most big multiplatform games over the next 12 months or so, in addition to whatever third-party exclusives they can nab and Nintendo's own titles... well, it'd be a stonker of a first year.
It would be a big gamble on their part - they'd need to be confident that their competitors couldn't steal the show with another huge leap for their next consoles, or that they would have at least 12-24 months uncontested in the "better than PS360" space, and that they could hit with a big enough bang to dislodge the audience glued to the 360 and PS3 and take them to their system (which would require some really compelling content).
We'll see.
Already am one, which makes me confused as to how they keep that thing coolEteric Rice said:
DECK'ARD said:Ironically Microsoft and especially Sony wouldn't actually mind this generation being extended with help from Nintendo.
All released footage was actually Wii2 and not PC.....The_Darkest_Red said:The Nintendo Wii 2 launching with the definitive console version of Battlefield 3...
LOLpoppabk said:All released footage was actually Wii2 and not PC.....
Vinci said:Actually, that should be MS and Sony's worst nightmares. They never want 3rd parties to imagine that working with Nintendo is not only doable but convenient or anything approaching a good idea.
onQ123 said:
I really wonder why no console manufacturer ever did something like that. Sounds like a great marketing stunt.poppabk said:All released footage was actually Wii2 and not PC.....
DECK'ARD said:3rd parties are out of their control to a large degree though.
More money from the same content is a lot more appealing than forced higher development costs of PS4/720 sometime in the future, no matter what moneyhats are thrown around.
Wii 2 is basically a completely new situation. Nintendo walking in after Sony and Microsoft got burnt forcing developers to HD and saying here you go, here's a new revenue stream for practically no effort.
Could be very potent, especially if they did launch this year.
Retro said:Like I said a few pages ago, they already have laser-projected keyboards that can sense which key you're pressing based on where the beam is broken. In theory that should allow for a method of sensing where on the virtual display your finger 'touched'.
They have glasses-less 3-D screens, maybe while working on that technology they found a way to project it at a different angle... would be fuckin' badarse, but I don't think it's gonna happen.
The PC community would call foul upon first sniff of the footage.wsippel said:I really wonder why no console manufacturer ever did something like that. Sounds like a great marketing stunt.
Zeal said:Star Road Online seriously sounds awesome as hell.
why can't they go with awesome concepts like this.
Graphics Horse said:Depends how serious Iwata was about improving relations with third parties. Would be crazy if so much has been going on behind the scenes for the last two years.
I hope the guys who we are getting impressions from have more knowledge about hardware than these guys. Holy shit.onQ123 said:
Yep, although we've barely seen games from half of those guys yet, heh.EmmanuelMunoz said:They surprised a lot of people with their announcement of all the 3DS third party support and their focus on it
Graphics Horse said:Yep, although we've barely seen games from half of those guys yet, heh.
Important to remember the 3DS could have been a completely unnanounce surprise at E3, followed by a December launch. I'd be amazed if that happened for Wii 2 but you never know.
You can bet Battlefield 3 will be on Wii2 at E3. If it isn't I'll be shocked honestly. What better game to highlight new powerful hardware than BF3 and have it running at PC level specs.The_Darkest_Red said:The Nintendo Wii 2 launching with the definitive console version of Battlefield 3...
I've brought this up a few times in this thread. Along with the E310 slide that EmmanuelMunoz posted, they've said that they had fewer 1st party launch titles for 3DS to make way for 3rd parties. I seriously believe that Nintendo have been making big positive steps in this regard, and they know that they can't tackle the core market on their own.Graphics Horse said:Depends how serious Iwata was about improving relations with third parties. Would be crazy if so much has been going on behind the scenes for the last two years.
Vinci said:I agree completely that 3rd parties would jump on such an opportunity without hesitation. What I'm saying is that MS and Sony should be utterly terrified of this ever happening. Their one saving grace against Nintendo is that 3rd parties have generally avoided Nintendo's hardware. To see something like a feature-complete BF3 or Bungie's new title on a Nintendo console, even if it's just multiplatform, brings into doubt the whole, "Only Nintendo games on Nintendo consoles" myth competitors have perpetuated against the company for years.
Woffls said:As for Sony/MS wanting this current generation to last. I would have agreed this time last week for many reasons, but if Nintendo can swoop in and start eating away at their market share? That leaves MS/Sony to attempt to differentiate themselves, and what will they try? Kinect and Move? Half off XBL and PSN+? Or resort to what they know best: MORE POWER!
EmmanuelMunoz said:They surprised a lot of people with their announcement of all the 3DS third party support and their focus on it
I was just throwing out suggestions, but to entertain your line of questioning, 3DS had massively improved online features which will only be improved again in the May update and in N6. If people can play the best looking version of BF3 online for free on - and this might be quite a leap of faith - a decent online Nintendo system, then I'd say that's slightly threatening to XBL Gold.Vinci said:Why would MS ever have to cut XBL's subscription price? It's not threatened by this new system.
Just did some quick checks. Its totally possible. A low resolution video feed with almost imperceptible lag is feasible. There are people gaming no problems at 1080p resolution at 60HZ with a wireless video feed.DECK'ARD said:I know you like considering everything that's possible, but you are comparing apples and oranges. The benefits of touch is that it's immediate. The benefits of being able to touch the TV screen picture in your hands (if it was possible) would be completely destroyed if whatever you touched took time to register and respond. Lag on things like the wiimote and Kinect can be easier hidden, and because you aren't physically touching something and expecting a response back from that you are more likely to tolerate it.
For direct controls though, Nintendo would rather walk over broken glass than do this. And the lag would affect everything from d-pad, to analog controls to the touch itself.
Woffls said:I was just throwing out suggestions, but to entertain your line of questioning, 3DS had massively improved online features which will only be improved again in the May update and in N6. If people can play the best looking version of BF3 online for free on - and this might be quite a leap of faith - a decent online Nintendo system, then I'd say that's slightly threatening to XBL Gold.
DECK'ARD said:Wii 2 is basically a completely new situation. Nintendo walking in after Sony and Microsoft got burnt forcing developers to HD and saying here you go, here's a new revenue stream for practically no effort.
I don't think anyone other than Valve is capable of making an online system that can compete with Xbox Live at the moment, but Nintendo could certainly do something to decrease Live's value in relative terms, like PSN has.Vinci said:I don't believe Nintendo will ever do anything online well enough to threaten Live, not entirely. Its built up a very concentrated, strong community around itself that would be hard to tackle for a company as conservative and family-focused as Nintendo. They might be able to get people to buy their system for this, that, or the other thing, but I seriously doubt it will ever be totally at MS's expense as long as Live exists.