MobsCanParry
can you answer 2 questions for me?
1) If this is all supposed to be some next-level ARG, why the "S____ _____L" tweet?
2) Why the 2015 Kickstarter with such heavy handed references to PT by releasing a "Playable Teaser"?? That was less than a year after PT came out.. and was a horror game using Silent Hill fonts.
If it's some next-level ARG, why are some of the references so obvious? Where is the riddle to solve in all of that?
The premise of your questions falls apart when I've said, I don't believe this is an ARG. So, can't answer that as I've said I don't believe this is an ARG. Let me make that clear. This isn't an ARG. There is no "game" here. It's as much an ARG as Moby Dick studios was. It wasn't. It was just bread crumbs to follow.
As for 2 I've never argued that he couldn't be a Kojima Stan. I even said he could be. I even said he could be a real developer, hired by Kojima to be the face of this. I DON'T KNOW. Neither do you or anyone else here, that's why we're here.
So why? Because he was trying to get some easy marketing. I mean that seems obvious. I'd conclude that's what you believe (though open to being wrong, not trying to speak for you) as well, as it seem like he was tyring to ride off the coattails of PT. I mean that's the implication in the question itself. And sure, he probably was.
Lot's of people were.
Lot's of people still are.
The difference, not all of those people have suddenly shown up on the Sony store with a new app not so subtly referencing two very well known, dare I say abandoned, IP's. Not all of them continue to have strange coincidences that align with Kojima and his recent discussions/tweets/etc. Not all of them have a history of overtly referencing Kojima/SH/MGS and yet, with that in mind, still show up on said PS store, reference all of this in the open to thousands of followers, get no attention in the press (strangely. especially considering Jason looked into this and then noped out, not with a warning to anyone about it being a scam mind you, same for Geoff. Really shady reporting of them if they were concerned don't you think?), and aren't called out by the publishers/developers of said game, and are even DIRECTLY referenced by Shu. But you know, those are just some small differences I have happened to notice.