http://www.ebay.com/itm/Samsung-Gal...0720728532?pt=Cell_Phones&hash=item2c67d75dd4
would this work on my Verizon LTE network ?
thinking about buying one instantly if it does....
or I just might buy one anyway
Nope
Also, multi window update is available: http://www.androidcentral.com/samsung-galaxy-note-2-update-enables-multi-window-multitasking-support
Right now, not all Android apps are supported, but the multi-window feature isn't just limited to Samsung apps like it is on the Note 10.1. Multi-window on the Note 2 supports a wide range of Google apps, including Gmail, YouTube, Chrome and Talk. Third-party offerings like the official Twitter app are supported too, though many others are not.
No 4G LTE on AT&T?
Not on this one. You will need the N7105 international model.
N7105 is LTE 2600/800. You need SGH-I317, which has 700/AWS for att lte
Do you guys think this phone will be worth getting on Verizon?
Web browser performance was a little lower than I thought it would be, but overall that is amazing battery life. Seems like it is easily a 2 day phone for most people.
iPhone 5 remains the best smartphone then.
iVerge reviewer posts image clearly showing display is not pentile.
iVerge reviewer posts image clearly showing display is not pentile.
iVerge reviewer says screen is pentile in accompanying text
iVerge reviewer claims Google Now is hidden away, apparently doesn't know about long press of menu button
good review, A-
I had no reception issues while reviewing the Galaxy Note II. It kept connected to my network reliably, never came close to dropping a call, even in areas of my home where other phones have occasionally struggled, and delivered clear voice calls. I found call quality to be a particular highlight on the Galaxy S III, and while I can’t say the same about the Note II, it acquitted itself very well in performing the duties of a phone.
iVerge reviewer posts image clearly showing display is not pentile.
iVerge reviewer says screen is pentile in accompanying text
iVerge reviewer claims Google Now is hidden away, apparently doesn't know about long press of menu button
good review, A-
I'm not convinced by this review. First there is a factual inaccuracy about "pentile-lite". It's not true that green has been replaced with blue, they're equal just spaced differently. It's actually RGB.
A few other bits and bobs about the review too, such as the commentary about a generation being off with colour accuracy and highlighting of the improper whites. What about the gross inaccuracy of blacks in other devices and the fact that there are colour modes to compensate for the more obtuse or vibrant ones? The Note IIs screen is actually the closest AMOLED has come to LCD whites in a mobile phone (they are now very close) but it still has black levels that are considerably better than their lcd counterparts.
I'd have argued the screen should have been a positive and not a negative for the review.
Their final ratings in each category seem to be pretty fair though.
I suppose I expected them to rate the software category higher than they did on the S3. S3 was graded with ICS, JB is smoother faster has Google Now etc, And overall the software suite for the Note 2 is clearly superior to that of the first note. But of course there is the scale of time, right now is not last year... so just because they improved the software over last year, doesnt mean they improved it enough for him to feel it should be graded higher.
One thing I do see in all these reviews of the Note 1/2 is that the reviewers seem to grudgingly admit to themselves that there are people who like very large screen sizes (though not without getting a dig in to mention that they are not sure why large screens in phones are popular).
I suppose I expected them to rate the software category higher than they did on the S3. S3 was graded with ICS, JB is smoother faster has Google Now etc, And overall the software suite for the Note 2 is clearly superior to that of the first note. But of course there is the scale of time, right now is not last year... so just because they improved the software over last year, doesnt mean they improved it enough for him to feel it should be graded higher.
I just noticed I haven't given any impressions about this thing. Gimme a sec
I'm not even sure why GAF has a hard-on for Verge reviews.TheVerge reviews are good until you get to the grading scale part. It's completely wack and inconsistent.
Looking at this review, the iPhone 5 review, and the Lumia 900 review, TheVerge reviewers really infuriate me. It feels like certain journalists review on a totally different scale than others. They give the iPhone 5 an 8.8 and this an 8.5, even though one you get down to the nit and grit of it, the Note exceeds it in everything except OS, which is just a matter of opinion. Then they say "It's time to stop giving Nokia a pass." I can't even understand that when they are giving iPhones raving reviews despite more of the same.
While I admit I didnt think about using the S Pen at all for my first few hours with the Galaxy Note II, once I started playing around with it, I found myself using it more and more.
God forbid a reviewer doesn't sound like he's on the company's payroll.
I prefer curmudgeon-y reviews. Every phone has flaws, the constant praise for these damn things is almost suffocating.
Aaanyway, I want this phone, but I'm completely befuddled by the network spectrum wavelengths and acronym soup. Is there a version out that I can get better than 2G (EDGE) speeds on T-mobile in the US? Or do I have to go through T-mobile directly (I'm not under contract and I don't really want to do that...)