feathered t-rex and pluto not being a planet are manbaby gaf's WORST NIGHTMARES
Just wait until Michael Bay's TMNT movie is released.
Easy, breezy, beautiful, clever girl.
Not asking him to. Was just weird seeing so many people quote his post when I thought it had been a staple for threads like these.I doubt many here cite their meme sources
I think by now smart people have realized that its best to avoid these threads
Is feathered Dinosaurs the new Pluto? This is the new Pluto, isn't it?
Easy, breezy, beautiful, clever girl.
Why would a huge animal have feathers? Wouldn't that be counterproductive? Or is that another type of feather? Explain this bullshit science, you are ruining Jurassic Park!
Maybe all these feathered dinosaur fossils traveled on an astroid that broke off from the ninth planet in our solar system, Pluto.
Fuck you, scientists.
Here is a feathered Deinonychus to go with the feathered T-Rex:
People complaining about feathered dinosaurs are almost as bad as the people who kept on whining about Pluto's relegation from planet status.
Feathers for thermoregulation, not flight. Same as Mammoths and Mastodons with fur.
In spite of the downy feathers cloaking the earliest tyrannosaurs, probably not all tyrannosaurs would have been giant fuzz balls from hell. The larger an endothermic animal, the more heat it generates relative to the surface area of its body. Thus, mammals such as elephants and rhinoceroses have just a sparse coat of hair, because they need to radiate excess heat efficiently. A full-grown T. rex would have weighed about the same as a large African elephant, and so it is unlikely that the dinosaur would have benefited from extensive insulation. If T. rex was endothermic, though, a recently hatched T. rex, weighing only a few pounds, would be predicted to have been covered in insulating feathers, which were then shed as the animal grew [see illustration right].
Paleontologist Alan Turner said:A lack of quill knobs does not necessarily mean that a dinosaur did not have feathers. Finding quill knobs on Velociraptor, though, means that it definitely had feathers. This is something we'd long suspected, but no one had been able to prove.
American Museum of Natural History Curator said:The more that we learn about these animals the more we find that there is basically no difference between birds and their closely related dinosaur ancestors like velociraptor. Both have wishbones, brooded their nests, possess hollow bones, and were covered in feathers. If animals like velociraptor were alive today our first impression would be that they were just very unusual looking birds
Keeping with the JP theme, here is the reality of velociraptor:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/Vraptor-scale.png[IMG]
[IMG]http://www.itsallfitness.com/cavesadventure/Extinct_Animals/dinosaurs/velociraptor_mongoliensis.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
There is no God.
All this anti-feathered dinosaur sentiment is about as ridiculous as the Pluto is still a planet rhetoric from a few years back.
Get the fuck over it people.
I like things like this just because of the possibility that science could be wrong about loads of stuff. What if aliens!?
∀ Narayan;36654878 said:What if dinosaurs are aliens?
OH SHIT, I JUST OPENED A CAN OF WORMS, DIDN'T I?!
Anyone have any questions/concerns about this?