Sean Hannity/FOX News' ACA lies debunked

Status
Not open for further replies.
The real crazy thing is eventually when this all calms down, they'll stop calling it Obamacare when it proves to be good overall. Then they'll start pointing out hey, a Republican in Romney did it in his state and basically the Democrats only copied. They'll push that agenda then.
 
I'll stick on fox news every so often for a laugh but i immediately turn it over when Hannity is on; something about his smugness at his own ignorance just annoys me, even glenn beck's willful stupidity and misinformation was hilarious to watch
 
Have had 3 women that I know of in our office sign up for ACA and save money doing it. I haven't checked for myself because I get my insurance for free at this point, but I'll probably have my wife look at it since we're currently paying in about $850 for her to cover herself and 2 kids.

the demonizing of ACA by the lunatic right just because it's a democrat/Obama based plan has reached all new levels of insanity.
 
it's pretty sad that people - i'm sure those profiled in the article aren't exceptions - aren't willing to make their lives easier because obamcare has been so built up as this grandiose evil. a damning indictment of a fractured, deeply divided political culture that's not just alienating people from politics but making people's day to day lives worse.

not to ignore the lies aspect, people like hannity who turn complex politics into independence day style populist entertainment aren't helping at all
 
The real crazy thing is eventually when this all calms down, they'll stop calling it Obamacare when it proves to be good overall. Then they'll start pointing out hey, a Republican in Romney did it in his state and basically the Democrats only copied. They'll push that agenda then.

Exactly, when it becomes a success then it will be all like, hey this is a republican plan and romney started it in massachusetts! You stupid citizens should be giving republicans the credit not democrats! I think it will be too late by then though. They already shutdown the government and threatened default over this, it's a democrat plan/obamacare now. And a whole bunch of politicians already have a no vote on the law itself. They will be put into a corner if this proves to be successful.
 
Fox News is becoming more and more like TMZ. Do conservatives have other avenues for TV news? They seem to be catering to idiots moreso than anyone else.
 
I know this sounds silly, but what are the repercussions of reporting a false story on a News Program? I know NPR mentions the goofs they make on the previous airings. Do TV programs do the same?

They already hide behind the news personalities. They've come out and said shows like Hannity are entertainment shows and not factual news shows. They use that hidden distinction to say whatever lies they want.
 
A shitty private company did the work.

There is a reason you have a difference in quality between the CD-i Zelda games and the Nintendo ones.

I've heard that the same company developed some of the state exchange sites which are getting quite favorable reviews. As with most things, different conditions will yield different results.
 
When the likes of Hannity and Fox News spread fear and misinformation about healthcare options, aren't they actively endangering people's health? Disgusting.

Winning a war against the Anti-Christ takes a few sacrifices. Besides they're only poor people. Who gives a fuck about them?
 

Hmm...

For me (not including wife)

Results

Because your income is more than 400% of the poverty level, you would not qualify for subsidized exchange coverage. The information below is about unsubsidized exchange coverage.

Household income in 2014:
967% of poverty level
Maximum % of income you have to pay for the non-tobacco premium, if eligible for a subsidy:
None
Health Insurance premium in 2014 (for a silver plan, before tax credit):
$3,205 per year
You could receive a government tax credit subsidy of up to:
$0 per year
(which covers 0% of the overall premium)
Amount you pay for the premium:
$3,205 per year
(which equals 2.14% of your household income and covers 100% of the overall premium)

$267 per month. I'm currently on an HSA with a HDHP plan, paying $45 a month and contributing $200/month into the HSA which is building up.

... no thanks.
 
I've heard that the same company developed some of the state exchange sites which are getting quite favorable reviews. As with most things, different conditions will yield different results.

So will a difference in numbers. The state sites are supporting one state's population each. The federal site is supporting twenty-six state populations. I can't imagine why they're having different outcomes.

It's the difference between GAF linking to Reddit and Reddit linking to GAF.
 
Wasn't there a court case a while ago that decided that news stations don't actually have to provide facts? It was pretty shocking but I think that's what helps Fox do what they do.

Yep. A reporter did a story that looked bad for Monsanto, Monsanto called Roger Ailes of Fox News and Fox News forced the reporter to modify the story to put it in a better light for Monsanto. She was fired and sued as a whistleblower because they were forcing her to report distorted information. She won at first, but Fox News appealed and the appellate court said "Yeah, she didn't have a case because the FCC policy against falsification really isn't a law, just a policy, and broadcasters can agree to follow it or not."
 
Could you or someone else explain what those drawbacks are? I know my family is saving a ton of money because of obamacare.

One that comes to mind is that Obamacare doesn't actually make healthcare prices cheaper. The government helps you pay for your healthcare through subsidies on top of a reduced cost you pay.


Personally I believe this will just make healthcare prices more expensive in the long run so it's sort of a bandage on a clusterfuck of a problem in this country. Just look at the relation between college tuition and college loans in this country. Although we won't know for sure until some time passes.
 
This is downright fucking disgusting. What despicable human beings. Honestly they need to be banned from America, how is this not terrorism, using fear to push your own agenda
 
The insurance networks are narrower. The Advance plans all have a narrowing of specialists and they have tiered hospital deductibles. There are now tier 1 and tier 2 hospitals. Tier 1 are "preferred', meaning they are usually worse hospitals and accept a lower reimbursement rate. Tier 2 hospitals have a separate deductible and tier 2 services are covered at a 60% on Gold rather than 80% in tier 1. I had a guy call me today who has a HMO Coinsurance plan which costs $510 a month w/ a $2500 deductible. If he goes with Epo Bronze his plan will be $800 a month with a $2500 deductible. He is not eligible for a subsidy and has gotten completely screwed by the new plans. The shame in all - at least with the company i work for - is the people with means have no other options other than these terrible ACA plans. They can't pay more for a traditional HMO or Direct Access plan. They are stuck with these 4 terrible plans. Obamacare is a mess.
 
One that comes to mind is that Obamacare doesn't actually make healthcare prices cheaper. The government helps you pay for your healthcare through subsidies on top of a reduced cost you pay.
When more people are signed up, the less it will cost. You are aware of how insurance works, right?
 
I know this sounds silly, but what are the repercussions of reporting a false story on a News Program? I know NPR mentions the goofs they make on the previous airings. Do TV programs do the same?

reporting false stories hurt because it perpetuates misinformation spread that conflicts with real information.

I didn't really start to notice stuff like this (i didn't watch news networks at the time) until the mass effect scandal ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKzF173GqTU )
 
When more people are signed up, the less it will cost. You are aware of how insurance works, right?

Insurance is essentially a pool of money from people who opt in. I understand you would THINK that the costs would go down... but is that really a guarantee that the costs will go down?

For all I know the insurance companies are just going to be as greedy as always and justify jumping the prices up.

But if you have an explanation as to why that will not be the case I would be glad to hear it.
 
The real crazy thing is eventually when this all calms down, they'll stop calling it Obamacare when it proves to be good overall. Then they'll start pointing out hey, a Republican in Romney did it in his state and basically the Democrats only copied. They'll push that agenda then.

And was originally proposed as an argument against single-payer buy Republicans in the 70's.
 
A shitty private company did the work.

There is a reason you have a difference in quality between the CD-i Zelda games and the Nintendo ones.

Exactly. The government chose shitty contractors who charged $200 MILLION for a website that does not work. They got scammed. Anybody who actually cared about the money being spent would not have blown $200 million before realizing that shit doesn't work. The government did zero oversight of the project.

The government very irresponsibly spent $200 million of our money and got fuck all in return.
 
Insurance is essentially a pool of money from people who opt in. I understand you would THINK that the costs would go down... but is that really a guarantee that the costs will go down?

For all I know the insurance companies are just going to be as greedy as always and justify jumping the prices up.

But if you have an explanation as to why that will not be the case I would be glad to hear it.
The law includes a provision that insurance companies have to put 80% of premiums toward coverage.
 
The real crazy thing is eventually when this all calms down, they'll stop calling it Obamacare when it proves to be good overall. Then they'll start pointing out hey, a Republican in Romney did it in his state and basically the Democrats only copied. They'll push that agenda then.

The name has probably stuck for good. No one ever calls Reaganomics by any other name.

It also doesn't help that Obama endorses the name himself.
 
I have had very in depth, serious discussions with some Republican friends of mine. I live in North Carolina and even though I'm in Charlotte, it still leans to the right. For most of them, they're paying more through ObamaCare than they did previously and that's really all there is to it for them. And I can understand that really.

...How....how are they paying more for insurance that wasn't available to them before Obamacare?...

....so I'm assuming by "very in depth, serious discussions", you meant...incorrect?

Do people still not know what the ACA actually is?
 
Exactly. The government chose shitty contractors who charged $200 MILLION for a website that does not work. They got scammed. Anybody who actually cared about the money being spent would not have blown $200 million before realizing that shit doesn't work. The government did zero oversight of the project.

The government very irresponsibly spent $200 million of our money and got fuck all in return.

If there was any negligence or noncompliance with contract terms, the government can seek a refund (or sue for one) just like anybody else.
 
Exactly. The government chose shitty contractors who charged $200 MILLION for a website that does not work. They got scammed. Anybody who actually cared about the money being spent would not have blown $200 million before realizing that shit doesn't work. The government did zero oversight of the project.

The government very irresponsibly spent $200 million of our money and got fuck all in return.

It's really funny because there was a commentary in one of the GTA V missions about workers receiving a government contract and not worrying about it if they fucked it up because they were guaranteed to get paid
 
The law includes a provision that insurance companies have to put 80% of premiums toward coverage.

So? Insurance companies had about an 80% payout on average before Obamacare. That provision is just enforcing what was already there. I was under Blue Shield at the time. They sent me a small refund check a while back because they came in at 79.6%. I wish I could remember the amount of the refund check, but that detail eludes me. I guess I could calculate it. .4% of my premium I'd assume. Doing some quick math it comes to $12 for the year.
 
...How....how are they paying more for insurance that wasn't available to them before Obamacare?...

....so I'm assuming by "very in depth, serious discussions", you meant...incorrect?

Do people still not know what the ACA actually is?

Increased costs are being associated with private health care providing more coverage to be ACA compliant.

Anecdotes I've read are things like a doctor having to provide plans that include maternity coverage despite every woman in the office being post-menopausal.

Personally, I don't see the preventative care coverage being worth much in terms of justification for premium increases. I'm not going to go into that too much, I've been drug through the coals any time I mention specifics from my health plan, which is roughly the equivalent of a bronze-level ACA plan.
 
Website works for me. This is the first time I've tried and right now I'm looking at healthcare plans. I actually get health care through my job and it's a bit cheaper so I won't be enrolling in this but I was just curious if I could get it to work.

See:

iQBGAHxl.png


Are the problems related to logging in or something?
 
Exactly. The government chose shitty contractors who charged $200 MILLION for a website that does not work. They got scammed. Anybody who actually cared about the money being spent would not have blown $200 million before realizing that shit doesn't work. The government did zero oversight of the project.

The government very irresponsibly spent $200 million of our money and got fuck all in return.

Government programming projects are a nightmare for companies. It takes even the simplest of tasks and turns it into a mountain.

http://news.slashdot.org/story/13/10/10/132221/cost-of-healthcaregov-634-million-so-far

http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/10/why-us-government-it-fails-so-hard-so-often/

But overall the contract bidding shit is horrible.
 
Hmm...

For me (not including wife)



$267 per month. I'm currently on an HSA with a HDHP plan, paying $45 a month and contributing $200/month into the HSA which is building up.

... no thanks.

Good for you. Don't sign up? Lordy lord....

Hannity is pretty scummy. With his dumb tilted clueless lost in ignorance puppy dog face.
 
Serious question what's the last national great thing Republicans did? Bush Senior with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Immigration Act and Reauthorizing the Clean Air Act?

Have they done fuck all since?
 
That website cost $200 million too. And it just doesn't work :/ The CA one is even worse, last time I tried that I ran into an untrusted SSL cert after clicking on the main link on the first page. Way to go guys...

This is one of the main reasons I want limited government. They just can't run things right if their lives depended on it.

Seriously. If it were a private, ad revenue driven site like say, NeoGaf it would never crash.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom