The Young Bucks are great at what they do, but "what they do" is exceedingly narrow and is basically the wrestling equivalent of, say, a "quirky" indie rom com - not much to it, but just enough appeal to consistently make money from of a relatively narrow segment of the market. Every match I've seen from them is exceedingly similar to every other match I've seen from them, and their "omg meta Dave Meltzer flippies" gimmick is really quite annoying, and not in a good way. I don't begrudge anyone their enjoyment of them, because ultimately, who gives a fuck about people's opinions about something as stupid as wrestling, where even the very best moments of the medium are exceedingly small threads in the human cultural fabric? I'd take Kevin Nash any day, because ultimately, he had a well-defined character that made sense for him and was quite a bit more versatile in terms of the kinds of stories and matches he could conceivably participate in.
Also, Sting vs. Triple H was awesome. Reigns vs. Lesnar was Match of the Night, and my personal WWE match of the year thus far, but Sting vs. Triple H was about as fun as wrestling gets and was almost like some kind of kabuki recreation of the Attitude Era. Fuck anybody who gets on their smarky high horse about that match. I think Sting probably should have won, for the story of the match, especially if they were planning on having him wrestle again after that, but fuck, was it enjoyable.
