About the bar crawl/drunk bit. Am I to assume that this was Molly getting the amount they need to drink wrong (on purpose or not). Can't just be from John's single shot addition. Or just that they're both lightweights.
I love how Mary is too amazing and everyone is like 'Yep, she's too great, she's evil or she dies. Nothing else can happen!'
Way ahead of you, bro. I'm on scene 6!
So... Is the part with Molly and Tom going to play our like that bit in Friends when Ross is with Emily?
![]()
Pretty much, but this is a modern day sitcom, so she shouts out the wrong name during, ifyaknowwhaimsayin.
that was the most sappy, self congratulatory, masturbatory, poorly structured, all round shitty episode of television I've seen since since...oh, since last episode.
fuck me, this series is really dying on its arse. The first two seasons were excellent but this pandering to the internet fanboys is really pissing away everything good about the series.
I wanted to love it, I wanted it to be good, but the show's lost its connection to the source material. It used to feel like a genuinely modernised version of Sherlock Holmes, now it feels like just another badly directed, self-important bbc drama. The loss of Paul McGuigan seems to have decimated the quality of the show.
edit: although still 10x better than Baskervilles
If we get multiple more seasons of this as the principal actors careers progress, I'm guessing having just one episode devoted to John's marriage with Mary will end up feeling pivotal to every character's arc.
Not sure if you realize this about storytelling, but moments of levity (all the "romantic comedy" bits) help the audience connect further with our characters so that the stakes are raised when they are put in peril. Or, you know, you can fucking despise it for being tumblr porn instead of being all plotty plotty mcbadguy.
I pretty much agree with all of this. I suggest you set your expectations accordingly before starting the second episode.Words
I can't believe so many people disliked it![]()
No, it really isn't. It's getting record viewing figures and still generating critical acclaim.that was the most sappy, self congratulatory, masturbatory, poorly structured, all round shitty episode of television I've seen since since...oh, since last episode.
fuck me, this series is really dying on its arse. The first two seasons were excellent but this pandering to the internet fanboys is really pissing away everything good about the series.
I wanted to love it, I wanted it to be good, but the show's lost its connection to the source material. It used to feel like a genuinely modernised version of Sherlock Holmes, now it feels like just another badly directed, self-important bbc drama. The loss of Paul McGuigan seems to have decimated the quality of the show.
edit: although still 10x better than Baskervilles
This episode was incredible, I'm shocked at the amount of dislike I'm seeing. I'm extremely apprehensive about the next episode, as it really does feel like things are about to go very, very badly.
If we get multiple more seasons of this as the principal actors careers progress, I'm guessing having just one episode devoted to John's marriage with Mary will end up feeling pivotal to every character's arc.
Not sure if you realize this about storytelling, but moments of levity (all the "romantic comedy" bits) help the audience connect further with our characters so that the stakes are raised when they are put in peril. Or, you know, you can fucking despise it for being tumblr porn instead of being all plotty plotty mcbadguy.
No, it really isn't. It's getting record viewing figures and still generating critical acclaim.
Seriously, the show is absolutely in love with itself and its idea of Sherlock
Kind of get the feeling this latest episode is Sherlock's Love and Monsters, which was equally terrific and equally capable of alienating a significant portion of the fanbase.
dying on its arse for me, I feel like I'm watching the show I love slip away.
No, because this was actually good and Love and Monsters was chronically horrendous with absolutely no redeeming features apart from ELO references.
It's a fundamentally detective show, the levity and characterisation are welcome as long as they are interwoven around the framework of a detective show, and that means a central framing of mystery which requires to be solved. Last nights show had the mystery tacked on as an afterthought, as did the week before, last weeks was a far more understandable decision as it at least moved the overriding plot on. Last nights show was extremely light on plot both internally and as part of the overriding plot.
It's a fundamentally detective show, the levity and characterisation are welcome as long as they are interwoven around the framework of a detective show, and that means a central framing of mystery which requires to be solved. Last nights show had the mystery tacked on as an afterthought, as did the week before, last weeks was a far more understandable decision as it at least moved the overriding plot on. Last nights show was extremely light on plot both internally and as part of the overriding plot.
The Sign Of Three proved what Sherlocks writers have been saying in interviews all year: that theirs isnt a detective show but a show about a detective.
I liked Baskerville
I actually felt like it was the opposite. The train bomb thing was solved in like 5 minutes and seemed like they added it in so they would have a mystery. The interwoven mystery from last night was actually executed very well.
In that context, an interesting snippet from this review
I still don't fully understand the point/connection of the Mayfly. Why was the photographer/mayfly doing what he was doing with those women?
What were the secrets that suspiciously each of those women on "I dated a ghost" had?
I feel like I've missed an important step somewhere.
So what?It's a fundamentally detective show, the levity and characterisation are welcome as long as they are interwoven around the framework of a detective show, and that means a central framing of mystery which requires to be solved. Last nights show had the mystery tacked on as an afterthought, as did the week before, last weeks was a far more understandable decision as it at least moved the overriding plot on. Last nights show was extremely light on plot both internally and as part of the overriding plot.
That's what I ended up using :lol Any idea how it does it? I can't seem to find any information on how it works.
They all worked for Watson's military mate, who was nigh on in hiding due to the attempts on his life (their secret was presumably working for this highly secretive individual). He was dating them each for one night, long enough to gather the information required to get to him at the wedding.
Hmm. This season's mysteries have been highly coincidental, eh?
I think the bit that really stretched the boundaries was thatthe very two mysteries Holmes used in his speech tied into the actual murder attempt. He had not done that it wouldn't have really pushed things any further than usual, but then had he not done that it wouldn't have tied together so neatly, so I can live with it!