• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Should BlueSky links be banned here?

Should BlueSky links be banned on NeoGAF?

  • Yes

    Votes: 16 16.8%
  • No

    Votes: 79 83.2%

  • Total voters
    95
Status
Not open for further replies.

YCoCg

Member
Seeing as other areas of the internet are trying to silence free speech by banning X links from being posted on their platform, we all know that the loonies have flown to BlueSky to foster their new echo chambers and pedo grounds so I say we at NeoGAF should strike fast, nip it in the bud, let's not allow links and posts from that cesspit on here, don't give it a chance to become a legit platform. What say you other members?
 

Mr1999

Gold Member
I dunno, but I did take advantage early on by snatching up 3 rare handles, one of which the twitter/x version sold for xx,xxx few years back. Not trademarked or copyrighted either. It's too early right now though, but definitely potential there for growth, not gonna sell the names.
 

IDKFA

I am Become Bilbo Baggins
Seeing as other areas of the internet are trying to silence free speech by banning X links from being posted on their platform, we all know that the loonies have flown to BlueSky to foster their new echo chambers and pedo grounds so I say we at NeoGAF should strike fast, nip it in the bud, let's not allow links and posts from that cesspit on here, don't give it a chance to become a legit platform. What say you other members?

You're unhappy that other areas of the Internet are trying to ban X links. Rightly so. We don't want to live in an echo chamber.

However, your solution to this is to do the same and block Bluesky links?

Do you see the problem with this?
 

Fbh

Member
If you actually cared about free speech like you say then you should be in favor of hearing from all corners of the internet, even the ones you dislike or disagree with.
If your reaction to X links being a banned in some places is to just ban Bluesky links then you aren't better than them.

This is one of the main reason I like GAF. The haters say it's just "reverse Resetera" but that's simply not true, because people here don't get banned for "wrongthink" or not agreeing with the consensus. You can make a thread about how you actually liked DA The Veilgard and all the LGBT stuff in it and you won't get banned for it.

Also let's be honest, most of the time when we post Bluesky links it's to make fun of them.
 
Last edited:

wondermega

Member
I dunno, but I did take advantage early on by snatching up 3 rare handles, one of which the twitter/x version sold for xx,xxx few years back. Not trademarked or copyrighted either. It's too early right now though, but definitely potential there for growth, not gonna sell the names.
I dig the Robocop 2 Cain avatar BTW
 

kruis

Exposing the sinister cartel of retailers who allow companies to pay for advertising space.
Yes we should ban all the furry pedo posts from there. Which is like 90% of the place.

That's actually a real problem on BlueSky :messenger_grinning_sweat:

ARVdusn.jpeg
 
Nobody cares about BlueSky really. And what reddit is doing is making itself even more irrelevant as less people will post or visit as it is just not convenient to read and discuss posts without links.
 
What you've just posted is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
 

Miyazaki’s Slave

Gold Member
Seeing as other areas of the internet are trying to silence free speech by banning X links from being posted on their platform, we all know that the loonies have flown to BlueSky to foster their new echo chambers and pedo grounds so I say we at NeoGAF should strike fast, nip it in the bud, let's not allow links and posts from that cesspit on here, don't give it a chance to become a legit platform. What say you other members?
This feature is already available.
Here is a screen shot:

J8yBBeh.png
 

Soodanim

Member
Seeing as other areas of the internet are trying to silence free speech by banning X links from being posted on their platform, we all know that the loonies have flown to BlueSky to foster their new echo chambers and pedo grounds so I say we at NeoGAF should strike fast, nip it in the bud, let's not allow links and posts from that cesspit on here, don't give it a chance to become a legit platform. What say you other members?
  1. AFAIK Reddit banning Twitter is about needing an account to read tweets, not silencing free speech
  2. Banning Bluesky on NeoGAF would not change Bluesky's trajectory in the slightest. "RIP Bluesky, if only GAF hadn't banned it" is not a phrase you're ever going to hear
  3. Hypocrisy, thy name is YCoCg
 

Mistake

Member
The first half of your paragraph is opposite to the second half. You're not making sense. Unless it's clearly a cp site or full of viruses, then no
 
When you remove politics from the equation, x.com and Bluesky are basically the same thing to me. Bluesky does have this interesting feature of being able to host your own data from a remote server and just use Bluesky as a front end.
 
I don't know why this mentality is prevalent, it's like: others are displaying a certain type of behavior, so we should do it too!.

It's juvenile.
 
Last edited:

Woggleman

Member
No because it is good to see all points of view and come to your own conclusion.

The one thing I like about this forum is that you can have lively debates with all different views while the forum just wants lockstep conformity.
 
Seeing as other areas of the internet are trying to silence free speech by banning X links from being posted on their platform, we all know that the loonies have flown to BlueSky to foster their new echo chambers and pedo grounds so I say we at NeoGAF should strike fast, nip it in the bud, let's not allow links and posts from that cesspit on here, don't give it a chance to become a legit platform. What say you other members?
Bro run to CVS and grab a sitz bath. It will help relieve the pain
 

segasonic

Member
I dunno, but I did take advantage early on by snatching up 3 rare handles, one of which the twitter/x version sold for xx,xxx few years back. Not trademarked or copyrighted either. It's too early right now though, but definitely potential there for growth, not gonna sell the names.
Bluesky has infinite namespaces for user handles
 

poodaddy

Member
Two wrongs don't make a right. You don't fight idiotic overreach and censorship by censoring in return. I know that politics have essentially devolved into that as well, and that's a shame, but I'd hope we can be better than that here. We should strive to be impartial, unbiased, and honest, and that means not lowering ourselves to the level of bad actors and sycophants.
 

-Minsc-

Member
BlueSky? Like Abe Simpson, it seems it has long since happened to me. No clue what B.S. is.

This is one of the main reason I like GAF. The haters say it's just "reverse Resetera" but that's simply not true, because people here don't get banned for "wrongthink" or not agreeing with the consensus. You can make a thread about how you actually liked DA The Veilgard and all the LGBT stuff in it and you won't get banned for it.
All the banned usernames will tell you otherwise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom