disappeared
Banned
Littlegator said:Saying this doesn't look great is a bit of a stretch?
It looks awful.
Littlegator said:Saying this doesn't look great is a bit of a stretch?
It looks awful.
loganclaws said:![]()
Yikes.
Pazuzu9 said:It looks like a big step up from Oblivion in terms of animation, but it's still pretty awkward. The most jarring omission is any kind of reaction animation to being killed. Everything just becomes an insta-ragdoll. The person getting shot by the bow in the cave for instance. Nobody dies like that. And the guy getting picked up and dropped by the dragon at the end... he's just an instant ragdoll from the second he's touched. No struggle or flailing of arms. Looks ridiculous.
PaulLFC said:My first thoughts as well...![]()
Their animation is also pretty terrible.bergcrantz said:Ah well,
I think they need some new art people over at bethesda.
The tech is impressive but for some reason they always go with a very generic, uninspired, clunky fantasy-look, imo. Doesn't look bad but could, and should, look WAY better. If they just had more talented people working on it. Mainly concept-artists as models & textures look decent enough.
edit: yea, and lighting looks pretty awful.
This is awful. I can't see anything in this photo. Seriously guys, dark does not equal good graphics.UrbanRats said:Personally, i love very dark, pitch black realistic dungeons (i like the night this way, too).
Something like:
![]()
(sorry for the quick and shitty photoshop).
Otherwise torches and cateyes spells are pretty much useless and there's no tension.
Plus i love the contrast, when you finally emerge into the sunlight, outside.
UrbanRats said:The lighting is good in the outdoors, but in the indoors it's fucking bland.
Waiting for the inevitable "realistic interiors" mod.
Ulchie said:I has a slight achievement whore problem. That is all.
(Is this GFWL??)
One does not force exclusion of the other, does it?Uriah said:Probably not. Fallout: New Vegas and Brink were both Steamworks games.
Forkball said:This is awful. I can't see anything in this photo. Seriously guys, dark does not equal good graphics.
Dude, have you even read my post?Forkball said:This is awful. I can't see anything in this photo. Seriously guys, dark does not equal good graphics.
Personally, i love very dark, pitch black realistic dungeons (i like the night this way, too).
(sorry for the quick and shitty photoshop).
Otherwise torches and cateyes spells are pretty much useless and there's no tension.
I agree with you. Light should just come from the candles, not non-existant ambient light. Would add a lot to the experience.UrbanRats said:Dude, have you even read my post?
Somethings up with that shot. The ground texture doesn't seem to be up to par with the rest and there are no shadows or dynamic lights.Rapture said:...what the hell is with that carpet by his feet. some very disappointing screens, but my hopes are still high for this game.
exYle said:Are you kidding me? No one is expecting an open world game to look like Gears obviously
.Vire said:It's really no excuse considering how Gears of War and Arkham City look on the same exact hardware.
Those two examples, especially GOW, don't really hurt his argument. I'm not saying I agree but those aren't great games to mention.Fredrik said:
Rapture said:![]()
...what the hell is with that carpet by his feet. some very disappointing screens, but my hopes are still high for this game.
DennisK4 said:
That was my point. I didn't start the comparison, I just responded to it while adding the fact that Skyrim is streaming a huge open world and Gears of War is, well, not. Cosidering how much stuff Bethesda throws at their engine I'd say that they're doing pretty fine, compared to just about anything.CoffeeJanitor said:Those two examples, especially GOW, don't really hurt his argument. I'm not saying I agree but those aren't great games to mention.
Door2Dawn said:All I see is brown, brown, and more brown.
Put some fucking color in that shit. Jesus.
~Kinggi~ said:You guys are fucking ridiculous.
99% chance it's Steamworks.Ulchie said:I has a slight achievement whore problem. That is all.
(Is this GFWL??)
There really has been nothing shown that would imply that it is. All the people super excited are the same ones that were able to look past all the problems with Oblivion and have a good time. Call me cautiously skeptical and will probably enjoy fooling with all the mods more than the actual vanilla game.Ryaaan14 said:I'm anxious to find out why people are so excited for this. Looks like a fine game, but I have yet to see what makes it so much better than previous Bethesda titles.
maniac-kun said:The gameplay videos look awesome:
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2011-elder-scrolls/714852
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/debut-in-game-elder-scrolls/710872
Those screens dont do the game justice.
Ryaaan14 said:I'm anxious to find out why people are so excited for this. Looks like a fine game, but I have yet to see what makes it so much better than previous Bethesda titles.
DaBuddaDa said:It's a DX9 engine built to run on current gen consoles, I was never expecting anything remotely close to The Witcher 2. It certainly looks better than vanilla Oblivion.
bengraven said:I have to admit...better threads degenerate into "look, bad textures" than every Skyrim thread talking about the complete abortion that (apparently) was Oblivion.