Support NeoGAF

[TheDreadBaron]

Accidentally?! It's clear you don't know what's happening as these are very deliberate. And it's amazing how through all this your outrage is just at same parents, and not at all towards these groomers teaching kids to twerk. It's very telling.

I'm not outraged at all you dork, you're all worked up over a silly moral panic and I'm trying to temper the conversation.

and how do you do that?
Go on.

Why should society be on the look out for normal looking dudes and not the ones in drag talking about twerking and inappropriate talks with kids?
Why should society look for the inconspicuous instead of the flagrant ones?

Take your time.

Because it's a false association. There's some dubious rumors about drag performers being inappropriate with kids. Even if that's true, they aren't all the same, and there's plenty of regular looking folks that are actual predators trying to blend in. Putting on a dress doesn't make someone a deviant, that's the point. People are getting all worked up because they associate gayness and differences in gender expression automatically with sexual predators and pedophiles, but pedophiles don't look like that and don't draw attention to themselves. They're looking in the wrong place, their kids are much more likely to be abused by a creepy uncle.

 

[Zephyrus0]

I'm not outraged at all you dork, you're all worked up over a silly moral panic and I'm trying to temper the conversation.

Because it's a false association. There's some dubious rumors about drag performers being inappropriate with kids. Even if that's true, they aren't all the same, and there's plenty of regular looking folks that are actual predators trying to blend in. Putting on a dress doesn't make someone a deviant, that's the point. People are getting all worked up because they associate gayness and differences in gender expression automatically with sexual predators and pedophiles, but pedophiles don't look like that and don't draw attention to themselves. They're looking in the wrong place, their kids are much more likely to be abused by a creepy uncle.

There's video evidence mate. Someone posted it in this page.
Go to libsoftiktok's twitter page and there's several more.
Nobody here is saying Drag Queens are deviant. Learn to read what people are actually saying instead of making your own conclusions beforehand.
Drag queen is adult entertainment. And some of these performers take it a step too far. As many people in the adult entertainment business will do. They get confortable talking about subjects they're used to in their line of work.

It's astounding others have to point this out. Just because moronic yuppies think it's okay to expose kids to that to showcase how progressive their retrograde brain is, that doesn't make it so.

What next? Expose kids to pornstar reading hour and dismiss concerns because we should be looking at the creepy uncle instead?

 

[TheDreadBaron]

There's video evidence mate. Someone posted it in this page.
Go to libsoftiktok's twitter page and there's several more.
Nobody here is saying Drag Queens are deviant. Learn to read what people are actually saying instead of making your own conclusions beforehand.
Drag queen is adult entertainment. And some of these performers take it a step too far. As many people in the adult entertainment business will do. They get confortable talking about subjects they're used to in their line of work.

It's astounding others have to point this out. Just because moronic yuppies think it's okay to expose kids to that to showcase how progressive their retrograde brain is, that doesn't make it so.

What next? Expose kids to pornstar reading hour and dismiss concerns because we should be looking at the creepy uncle instead?

I looked at the video that was posted, I just fully wouldn't care if my theoretical kid was exposed to a man in a dress wiggling their butt a little bit in a silly way. It doesn't threaten me. I don't think that's what grooming is, unless by grooming you mean normalizing the idea to children that it's ok to be flamboyant and gay as the day is long.

 

[E-Cat]

Porn isn't good for you folks. Get a partner that can keep up with your needs.

That isn't an option for everyone, though. Porn is the next best thing for a lonely male with no value, hence unlikely to attract a partner that can meet their needs.

 

[FunkMiller]

Porn isn't good for you folks. Get a partner that can keep up with your needs.

Very true.

No dudes ever look at porn once they have a partner.

 

[Zephyrus0]

I looked at the video that was posted, I just fully wouldn't care if my theoretical kid was exposed to a man in a dress wiggling their butt a little bit in a silly way. It doesn't threaten me. I don't think that's what grooming is, unless by grooming you mean normalizing the idea to children that it's ok to be flamboyant and gay as the day is long.

Theoretical kid...
That explains a lot actually.
When you become a father you"ll understand... if you have some sense.
Personally I don't want mine exposed to people who are going to teach them to shake their ass to adults. That it's okay to be flamboyant near strangers.
It's not necessarily groomer behavior but it does teach them to lower their guard to potential groomers. You desensitize kids to certain actions.

This isn't some nonsensical fear. This is how people behave. This is our psyche works. It doesn't matter the subject. This is a constant in everything we do. Our actions and behavior is conditioned by our experiences.

 

[E-Cat]

Very true.

No dudes ever look at porn once they have a partner.

Why not look at porn with your partner? I do.

 

[FunkMiller]

Why not look at porn with your partner? I do.

Too busy getting whores to join us in a threesome.








I fucking wish

 

[E-Cat]

Too busy getting whores to join us in a threesome.

She's bisexual (as is apparently every other woman), always checking out girls' butts in the locker room and whatnot. So far we've concluded, however, that she's too socially awkward and jealous to make a threesome work. I was her first (I'm a bit older than she is), feel kinda bad that she's never had a taste of the ol' muff.

 

[FunkMiller]

She's bisexual (as is apparently every other woman), always checking out girls' butts in the locker room and whatnot. So far we've concluded, however, that she's too socially awkward and jealous to make a threesome work. I was her first (I'm a bit older than she is), feel kinda bad that she's never had a taste of the ol' muff.

In my experience, women tend to like looking at other women, but when it comes to the actual deed, theyre not into it. Makes sense. Women are by far and away the more aesthetically attractive of the two sexes. I only ever had one girl who was properly bisexual. Was quite the experience. One I wouldn't want to repeat as a man in his 40s

 

[93xfan]

Your wording sounds a lot like you think all drag performers are sexual predators. Taking isolated incidents and over representing their significance.

If you take in the news as a whole though, it's not the drag queens that are getting arrested for sexual crimes against children. It's a different group.

No. I was talking about the groomers teaching kids to twerk, spread their legs showing their skimpy underwear and gyrating, as stated in my last message. This seems like a common diversionary tactic to find something else to argue about when people are defending this behavior in front of very young kids.

Kids shouldn't be taught to do sexual acts, nor should they be encouraged to act sexual like this.

 

[Maiden Voyage]

All these people worried about groomers are going to go crazy when they find out about the Catholic Church.

 

[93xfan]

I'm not outraged at all you dork, you're all worked up over a silly moral panic and I'm trying to temper the conversation.

Because it's a false association. There's some dubious rumors about drag performers being inappropriate with kids. Even if that's true, they aren't all the same, and there's plenty of regular looking folks that are actual predators trying to blend in. Putting on a dress doesn't make someone a deviant, that's the point. People are getting all worked up because they associate gayness and differences in gender expression automatically with sexual predators and pedophiles, but pedophiles don't look like that and don't draw attention to themselves. They're looking in the wrong place, their kids are much more likely to be abused by a creepy uncle.

Rumors? I posted a video on it. It's irrefutable. What a gaslighting clown.

But since you'd rather have a different conversation, do you believe pedophiles deserve life in prison? At least much harsher penalties?

 

[E-Cat]

In my experience, women tend to like looking at other women, but when it comes to the actual deed, theyre not into it. Makes sense. Women are by far and away the more aesthetically attractive of the two sexes. I only ever had one girl who was properly bisexual. Was quite the experience. One I wouldn't want to repeat as a man in his 40s

No, she's def bisexual -- but does admit logistically she prefers the D. Which makes perfect sense.

 

[93xfan]

All these people worried about groomers are going to go crazy when they find out about the Catholic Church.

Says the guy who thinks this all is a joke. You and your groomer buddies would be surprised at how incredibly prevalent it is in public schools as well. maybe you're even trying to distract us from that for some reason…

 

[Maiden Voyage]

Says the guy who thinks this all is a joke. You and your groomer buddies would be surprised at how incredibly prevalent it is in public schools as well. maybe you're even trying to distract us from that for some reason…

You're accusing me of being a groomer. Do you have anything besides ad hominem attacks?

Talk about something that is actually happening and I'll take it more seriously.

Catholic Church sexual abuse cases - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[funkygunther]

All these people worried about groomers are going to go crazy when they find out about the Catholic Church.

Not just Catholic

https://southernmarylandchronicle.com/2021/04/08/how-protestant-churches-hid-sexual-abuse/

As usual it's all projection

 

[Maiden Voyage]

Not just Catholic

https://southernmarylandchronicle.com/2021/04/08/how-protestant-churches-hid-sexual-abuse/

As usual it's all projection

Selective outrage as usual these days.

 

[TheDreadBaron]

Rumors? I posted a video on it. It's irrefutable. What a gaslighting clown.

But since you'd rather have a different conversation, do you believe pedophiles deserve life in prison? At least much harsher penalties?

I keep telling you I watched the video and yet I wasn't outraged by what I saw. We disagree on that point, no gaslighting here.

Isn't all this grooming talk about grooming kids to be sexually exploited? I don't think it's changing the subject to defend drag performers against accusations of pedophilia, isn't that what this is all about?

Yeah of course pedophiles deserve the harshest punishment and to be removed from society. There's no conspiracy here, just differences of opinion and priorities.

Edit: I'm absolutely not going to go digging around something called
Libsoftiktok, but I'll grant you there's some video of someone doing something inappropriate, doesn't make it a drag queen grooming conspiracy. That's all I have to say, back to the porn talk?

 

[JC 1080P CRT]

No, she's def bisexual -- but does admit logistically she prefers the D. Which makes perfect sense.

I don't know the numbers, but I think out of all bisexual people who are currently in a relationship, the majority of those relationships are opposite-sex?
There's several different factors, like it generally being easier to find and be in an opposite-sex relationship, some people having realizations about their orientation later on in life.

As far as sexual preferences, I don't think a perfect 50:50 split between sexes ("the D" or "the P") is the norm. Usually it's skewed toward one or the other, and sometimes that preference even fluctuates.

 

[93xfan]

I keep telling you I watched the video and yet I wasn't outraged by what I saw. We disagree on that point, no gaslighting here.

Well, you did call it rumors of inappropriate behavior.

Isn't all this grooming talk about grooming kids to be sexually exploited? I don't think it's changing the subject to defend drag performers against accusations of pedophilia, isn't that what this is all about?

It's definitely sexually charged stuff for kids. I don't hold the drag performers any more responsible than the crazy assholes who thought this was a good idea.

Yeah of course pedophiles deserve the harshest punishment and to be removed from society. There's no conspiracy here, just differences of opinion and priorities.

Edit: I'm absolutely not going to go digging around something called
Libsoftiktok, but I'll grant you there's some video of someone doing something inappropriate, doesn't make it a drag queen grooming conspiracy. That's all I have to say, back to the porn talk?

Definitely not accusing drag performers of being pedophiles or conspiring, just disgusted that this is being pushed on children. There are those who actually celebrate getting kids to do that and they are all groomers.

 

[93xfan]

You're accusing me of being a groomer. Do you have anything besides ad hominem attacks?

Talk about something that is actually happening and I'll take it more seriously.

http://[URL][URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sexual_abuse_cases

[/URL][/URL]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/has-media-ignored-sex-abuse-in-school/

""[T]hink the Catholic Church has a problem?" she said. "The physical sexual abuse of students in schools is likely more than 100 times the abuse by priests."

What happened in the Catholic Church is appealing, especially with coverups. Nonetheless, maybe take an honest look at other places where it is worse. I know some of you love to use religion as a punching bag, but at least be fair and honest.

 

[Maiden Voyage]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/has-media-ignored-sex-abuse-in-school/

""[T]hink the Catholic Church has a problem?" she said. "The physical sexual abuse of students in schools is likely more than 100 times the abuse by priests."

What happened in the Catholic Church is appealing, especially with coverups. Nonetheless, maybe take an honest look at other places where it is worse. I know some of you love to use religion as a punching bag, but at least be fair and honest.

You should get a hobby

 

[93xfan]

You should get a hobby

Also from the article:

"Yet, during the first half of 2002, the 61 largest newspapers in California ran nearly 2,000 stories about sexual abuse in Catholic institutions, mostly concerning past allegations. During the same period, those newspapers ran four stories about the federal government's discovery of the much larger — and ongoing — abuse scandal in public schools."

Aside from that, I don't think I need to communicate with someone who can make a joke out of anything. Especially when they show they're unwilling to engage when they don't like the way the facts make them feel. You'll be on ignore from here on out.

 

[Maiden Voyage]

Also from the article:

"Yet, during the first half of 2002, the 61 largest newspapers in California ran nearly 2,000 stories about sexual abuse in Catholic institutions, mostly concerning past allegations. During the same period, those newspapers ran four stories about the federal government's discovery of the much larger — and ongoing — abuse scandal in public schools."

Aside from that, I don't think I need to communicate with someone who can make a joke out of anything. Especially when they show they're unwilling to engage when they don't like the way the facts make them feel. You'll be on ignore from here on out.

This is your post history on a video game forum.

 

[Dr. Claus]

Also from the article:

"Yet, during the first half of 2002, the 61 largest newspapers in California ran nearly 2,000 stories about sexual abuse in Catholic institutions, mostly concerning past allegations. During the same period, those newspapers ran four stories about the federal government's discovery of the much larger — and ongoing — abuse scandal in public schools."

Aside from that, I don't think I need to communicate with someone who can make a joke out of anything. Especially when they show they're unwilling to engage when they don't like the way the facts make them feel. You'll be on ignore from here on out.

You seriously should get a hobby. Maybe play some games. You seem to be on a crusade and most folks are sick of it. Talk about games and move on, mate.

 

[FunkMiller]

You should get a hobby

I thought ass licking was his hobby?

I'm so fucking confused.

Maybe I need Jesus. He'd set me right. I know he likes ass licking. This thread has told me so.

 

[BadBurger]

I've grown accustomed to those complaining about "groomers" the loudest being the actual groomers (or guilty of child pornography), and/or running in their circles. Calling others a groomer these days appears to often be a confession.

Oh, and they almost always make shit up but can't produce any evidence.

 

[Rentahamster]

Maybe I need Jesus. He'd set me right. I know he likes ass licking. This thread has told me so.

I'm happy to inseminate Biblically grounded teachlings. Please subscribe to my newsletter.

 

[OmegaSupreme]

Thread about porn took a turn. Porn is bad mkay. Especially if you're young. Which some of you sound like you are. Get a girlfriend/boyfriend. Workout.

 

[OZ9000]

Your Brain On Porn

Curious about the latest research on internet porn's effects? Your Brain on Porn looks at teh science and the lived experience of people consuming internt pornography

www.yourbrainonporn.com

This is a good website.

 

[Wildebeest]

If only it were as easy to banish hunger by rubbing my belly.

 

[Maiden Voyage]

I've grown accustomed to those complaining about "groomers" the loudest being the actual groomers (or guilty of child pornography), and/or running in their circles. Calling others a groomer these days appears to often be a confession.

Oh, and they almost always make shit up but can't produce any evidence.

 

[funkygunther]

http://[URL]https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/

[/URL]

This is a good website.

"teh science"

teh lolz

 

[Lunarorbit]

Also from the article:

"Yet, during the first half of 2002, the 61 largest newspapers in California ran nearly 2,000 stories about sexual abuse in Catholic institutions, mostly concerning past allegations. During the same period, those newspapers ran four stories about the federal government's discovery of the much larger — and ongoing — abuse scandal in public schools."

Aside from that, I don't think I need to communicate with someone who can make a joke out of anything. Especially when they show they're unwilling to engage when they don't like the way the facts make them feel. You'll be on ignore from here on out.

Yikes alive. The catholic church engaged in a decades long systemic cover up involving untold priests. When caught they were shipped to other parishes so they could continue abusing children.

These aren't the same. Catholic priests have more in common with the taliban and their comfort boys.

 

[BigDeadFreak]

I'm not outraged at all you dork, you're all worked up over a silly moral panic and I'm trying to temper the conversation.

Because it's a false association. There's some dubious rumors about drag performers being inappropriate with kids. Even if that's true, they aren't all the same, and there's plenty of regular looking folks that are actual predators trying to blend in. Putting on a dress doesn't make someone a deviant, that's the point. People are getting all worked up because they associate gayness and differences in gender expression automatically with sexual predators and pedophiles, but pedophiles don't look like that and don't draw attention to themselves. They're looking in the wrong place, their kids are much more likely to be abused by a creepy uncle.

When people point out that there a pedophiles in a certain walk of life the correct response is to do something about it. If you respond by engaging in whataboutery then you are on the wrong side of history.

 

[funkygunther]

When people point out that there a pedophiles in a certain walk of life the correct response is to do something about it. If you respond by engaging in whataboutery then you are on the wrong side of history.

Yes. Listen to the victims, gather what evidence you can, report to the police. The reason we're even discussing drag and paedophiles in the same breath is because people know there's no crime being committed by a drag performer shaking their butt, especially not the crime of paedophilia, so all that's left is for useful idiots to tie the two together in their imagination.

 

[93xfan]

Yikes alive. The catholic church engaged in a decades long systemic cover up involving untold priests. When caught they were shipped to other parishes so they could continue abusing children.

These aren't the same. Catholic priests have more in common with the taliban and their comfort boys.

Everyone of those involved deserve life in prison as well. That was absolutely an evil way to handle it.

But people are using the stories to pretend religious people are more likely pedophiles and I'm pointing out it is so much more widespread than most of the media would have you believe. Many, many pedophiles in public schools as well.

I'm not catholic, btw.

 

[93xfan]

I've grown accustomed to those complaining about "groomers" the loudest being the actual groomers (or guilty of child pornography), and/or running in their circles. Calling others a groomer these days appears to often be a confession.

Oh, and they almost always make shit up but can't produce any evidence.

You mean like your above statement, stating that those calling out groomers are actually groomers?

It seems like a statement with the only purpose of silencing anybody who points out wrongdoing. "Shhhh. Everyone keep quiet about teaching children how to twerk and other worse things so we can keep doing it." your contribution encourages this behavior and is meant to silence the critics.

Disgusting

 

[MGHA]

Ive only seen a 'gina in pictures.

 

[BigDeadFreak]

Yes. Listen to the victims, gather what evidence you can, report to the police. The reason we're even discussing drag and paedophiles in the same breath is because people know there's no crime being committed by a drag performer shaking their butt, especially not the crime of paedophilia, so all that's left is for useful idiots to tie the two together in their imagination.

I found this within a few seconds of searching.

http://antitrafficking.am/eng/new-a...ds-at-houston-library-is-convicted-pedophile/

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-strange-reaction-to-the-death-of-a-child-rapist-drag-queen/

There's clearly been drag queens who've sexually abused children. It has been reported to the police and they have been convicted.

 

[funkygunther]

I found this within a few seconds of searching.

http://antitrafficking.am/eng/new-a...ds-at-houston-library-is-convicted-pedophile/

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-strange-reaction-to-the-death-of-a-child-rapist-drag-queen/

There's clearly been drag queens who've sexually abused children. It has been reported to the police and they have been convicted.

same as there have been pedophiles in all other sorts of walks of life, the evidence presented in this thread was about a twerking drag queen that was being conflated with pedophilia...as if there was a connection

the whataboutism happened at the start, it wasn't enough that drag queens were around, it was what about the ones that were pedophiles? well it looks like they get action taken on them!

 

[Maiden Voyage]

 

[The Lunch Legend]

Ive only seen a 'gina in pictures.

 

[Dr. Claus]

I've grown accustomed to those complaining about "groomers" the loudest being the actual groomers (or guilty of child pornography), and/or running in their circles. Calling others a groomer these days appears to often be a confession.

Oh, and they almost always make shit up but can't produce any evidence.

FBI, check this dude's closet.

 

[supernova8]

So I did some.... research.... her porn looks pretty normal aside from her doing that stupid roll eyes tongue out face on the thumbnail thing.... not sure who finds that nonsense attractive.

 

[E-Cat]

So I did some.... research.... her porn looks pretty normal aside from her doing that stupid roll eyes tongue out face on the thumbnail thing.... not sure who finds that nonsense attractive.

It's a sexual display, basically.

"Kimi claims that reasons for including ahegao in a scene include reflecting a character's joyful emotions such as ecstasy or pleasure; to show negative emotions such as fear or reluctance; or to show domination, submission and loyalty."

Ahegao - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Maiden Voyage]

Ahegao is a plague.

 

[Maiden Voyage]

 

[BadBurger]

You mean like your above statement, stating that those calling out groomers are actually groomers?

It seems like a statement with the only purpose of silencing anybody who points out wrongdoing. "Shhhh. Everyone keep quiet about teaching children how to twerk and other worse things so we can keep doing it." your contribution encourages this behavior and is meant to silence the critics.

Disgusting

Google exists, put in the fifteen minutes of work such a search and research would take. There are plenty of stories. I'll give you a hint of just one example: a news site that rhymes with "Maily Boast" kept a running story on it for a while. They ended it after 32 parts and 800 examples. It's one of the top results. I won't share because it's political but have a ball searching champ.