• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Star Wars Episode 7 - Thread of Pre-Production

Honestly though, does anyone think Disney won't straight out remake the first six films just to ensure they don't have to pay Fox any royalties to sell/distribute Lucas' originals?

Give it 10 years.

I think Disney will own the rights to everything in the franchise, except Episode IV distribution rights, by 2020.

How they handle Saga sets should be interesting.
 

bill0527

Member
I can't ever see them remaking the original.

That would be like remaking Gone With The Wind, Jaws, Lawrence of Arabia.

The universe is so big that they don't need to remake the originals.
 

Cheebo

Banned
You guys realize with the selling of Lucasfilm George Lucas is now one of Disney's largest stock holders right? He still has significant influence in his position. They won't be remaking those movies in his lifetime.
 
You guys realize with the selling of Lucasfilm George Lucas is now one of Disney's largest stock holders right? He still has significant influence in his position. They won't be remaking those movies in his lifetime.

Stock buyback.

He isn't keeping those shares.
 

temp

posting on contract only
The clone wars animated series has been hugely successful. Prequel era won't be forgotten. And it will always be included in the massive boxsets. It's quality isn't up there with the rest but being part of the franchise means it will always be there. It's like saying the Roger Moore era of James Bond will be forgotten. The prequels are 3 films in a massively popular franchise and will be in every boxset from here on for the rest of our lives.

Saying they will be forgotten is incredibly unlikely. They will always be re-released and in the boxsets.

Not to mention kids love them, again the clone wars example.

I think people mean that the prequel zeitgeist is gonna be over, and by-and-large eclipsed by the new movies and the original movies. Doesn't seem like they'll keep pushing the prequel stuff very hard in the near future since having three active time periods might be kinda confusing.
 
You guys realize with the selling of Lucasfilm George Lucas is now one of Disney's largest stock holders right? He still has significant influence in his position. They won't be remaking those movies in his lifetime.

Seriously, if he actually gave a fuck, he wouldn't have sold Lucasfilm. He doesn't have significant influence, nor does he want it. I don't get this argument. He owned 100% of his company, and then he SOLD 100% of his company to a completely different company. If he cared about exerting his influence on Star Wars, he wouldn't have gotten rid of it. The 2 billion in stock isn't a choke chain - it's just 2 billion dollars that could become 3 or 4 billion dollars without him having to a damn thing but sit around on his ass.

They'll remake Star Wars at some point. It's not in any way untouchable. It's not Lawrence of Arabia or Gone With the Wind. It's Star Wars. And the argument that the universe is big doesn't really ring true, either. The cinematic universe is in fact, pretty small. The MERCHANDISING universe is big, but as the thread has repeatedly pointed out, nobody making the movies seems to give that much of a shit about the merchandising universe.

They reset James Bond. They reset Star Trek, of all things. They'll get around to redoing Star Wars. And Lucas won't have to die first, I'm sure. People thought that he'd have to die before anyone else got creative control, and it turns out while we were all saying that, he was hiring Kathleen Kennedy and taking lunches with Bob Iger.
 

Cheebo

Banned
They won't. Especially since we are likely seeing the likes of Mark Hamill and friends in the new trilogy, remaking the original would be even further of a odd prospect.
 
EON never remade a James Bond movie and Paramount never remade a Star Trek movie. Reboots are not remakes.

Nah, Paramount used Star Trek to remake Star Wars :)

Seriously though - the idea that Star Wars is untouchable, especially considering the dilution of the brand - and that's what it is more than anything, a brand, and not a cohesive storytelling experience - seems silly, to me. It's Star Wars.
 

Cheebo

Banned
Nah, Paramount used Star Trek to remake Star Wars :)

Seriously though - the idea that Star Wars is untouchable, especially considering the dilution of the brand - and that's what it is more than anything, a brand, and not a cohesive storytelling experience - seems silly, to me. It's Star Wars.

There is a big difference between outright remaking the OT and rebooting or restarting the franchise ala Casino Royale, Star Trek '09, Batman Begins, or The Amazing Spider-Man. None of those were remakes, I honestly can't think of an example of a full on complete remake for a big name geek franchise like this. It just isn't done. They won't remake it, I mean they are probably having Mark Hamill and the like in the new trilogy, that would make remaking them extremely odd since they are tying themselves so heavily to the OT as it is with the actors that played the roles.
 

jtb

Banned
Star Wars, even more so than those other movies and franchises, is a cultural touchstone.

Reboot? maybe (though even then, that would be a HUGE risk and the franchise would have to have had some kind of Matrix-esque collapse, and not even the prequels managed that). Remake? Incredibly unlikely.
 
I yield to the thread! My weary old head is full of brambles and cynicism.

The degrees between reboot/remake are not too large, though.
 

Cheebo

Banned
Star Wars, even more so than those other movies and franchises, is a cultural touchstone.

Reboot? maybe (though even then, that would be a HUGE risk and the franchise would have to have had some kind of Matrix-esque collapse, and not even the prequels managed that). Remake? Incredibly unlikely.

The most likely scenario if they feel the franchise is getting too muddled and losing interest is to shift to a vastly different time period and do a full on restart without any connection to the previous films.

Which obviously Disney has little interest anytime soon in seeing how they are moving forward for the next ten years with direct sequels to Return of the Jedi.

If Disney at all felt the franchise needed a restart of any kind they wouldn't be doing Star Wars 7, a sequel to Return of the Jedi. They are tieing themselves down to the original films pretty blatantly here.
 
Unless you want to drag Star Wars back from the gutter. Since he saved Batman and all.

I would offer Nolan 20 million up front plus 6% of the gross, toys etc............

I know he did, but his style is completely different to how Star Wars is. It doesn't fit here.

We don't need a "dark" Star Wars.
 
Unless you want to drag Star Wars back from the gutter. Since he saved Batman and all.

I would offer Nolan 20 million up front plus 6% of the gross, toys etc............

He saved Batman? That's why Dark knight rising didn't even sell as many tickets as Tim Burton's Batman movie did (http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/22/batman-89-sold-more-tickets-than-the-dark-knight-rises)? Oh and Batman didn't need saving. He already had Bruce Timm and Paul Dini telling the best stories of his existence.

If Nolan was directing the characters would be completely unrecognizable, the iconic music replaced with mundane Hans Zimmer esque crap, the lightsabers would be removed for not being "realistic" enough and there would be some dumb plot twist towards the end of the film like "Luke was dead the whole time!"
 
I know he did, but his style is completely different to how Star Wars is. It doesn't fit here.

We don't need a "dark" Star Wars.

But that is exactly what I want. :(
A very dark Star Wars.

He saved Batman? That's why Dark knight rising didn't even sell as many tickets as Tim Burton's Batman movie did (http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/22/batman-89-sold-more-tickets-than-the-dark-knight-rises)? Oh and Batman didn't need saving. He already had Bruce Timm and Paul Dini telling the best stories of his existence.

If Nolan was directing the characters would be completely unrecognizable, the iconic music replaced with mundane Hans Zimmer esque crap, the lightsabers would be removed for not being "realistic" enough and there would be some dumb plot twist towards the end of the film like "Luke was dead the whole time!"


In Hollywood TV is still regarded as garbage. Its all about film.

Nolan brought respect back to the franchise after it had almost been unsavable.
 
Honestly though, does anyone think Disney won't straight out remake the first six films just to ensure they don't have to pay Fox any royalties to sell/distribute Lucas' originals?

Give it 10 years.

Nope. They won't. There would be mass rebellion from the fans. Its smarter to just bite the bullet and perpetually give Fox whatever they are owed for Episode IV because they are still going to make a shit ton of money from their cut of that film (and make no mistake, they still will be making some money from Episode IV even if they have to give Fox a cut) plus the full cut from the other films. It makes too much business sense to do this for Disney, and the same for Fox.

You generally won't see MS and Sony or Nintendo ever working together in the video game industry (unless one of them eventually gets bought out or turns into a third party like Sega), but thats not how it works in other industries. They will work together when the opportunity makes sense.
 

Cheebo

Banned
Ewan McGreggor was perfect. One of the few things about the prequels I would never change or could imagine done better. He was fantastic as Obi-Wan.
 
The problem with bringing back Ewok Mcgregor is that Disney would then have to pull a lucas and CG replace Alec guiness with Ewan in Episodes 4-6.
 

jtb

Banned
Eh I thought McGregor was pretty terrible. But, so was everyone else and it's not like he had anything to work with.

I just don't want it to happen because the definitive Obi-Wan will always be Alec Guinness. No need to go to the Obi-Wan or prequel wells again, imo.
 

Trurl

Banned
Episode 7 is going to completely streamroll over the entire EU.

It's going to be amazing seeing the nerd rage and asperger's freakout of people:

1. Explaining why it's the worst Star Wars ever and why it's non-canon and the EU stays pristine.

2. Bending language, logic, and mental capacity to breaking point trying to reconcile all the contradictory EU with the new official canon.

It'll be like watching religious debates, except this time the word of god is quite provable.

Can't there be multiple canons? I enjoyed the prequels as they came out and am looking forward to the new trilogy (although Indy 4 gave me a taste of what it's like to be extremely disappointed by a series' return), but I don't see what is so great about this new canon when it's not like Star Wars will be the vision of one creator. Is it just because Disney owns the rights? Is that what makes them "god?" There is something really depressing about that regardless of my opinion on the EU.

PS-Sorry for quoting you after you've been banned and can't respond. I know that it's not the best thing to do.
 
Eh I thought McGregor was pretty terrible. But, so was everyone else and it's not like he had anything to work with.

I just don't want it to happen because the definitive Obi-Wan will always Alec Guinness. No need to go to the Obi-Wan or prequel wells again, imo.

Pretty much this. With the exception of a few, everyone was inexplicably terrible in the prequels. McGregor could have been so much better but the writing limited him, Sam Jackson was sleepwalking, McDiarmid hammed it up mightily, Smits had nothing to do, and I don't know what the fuck was going on with Natalie Portman.

Lucas managed to make Liam Neeson boring. Quite a feat.
 
Yes, McGregor was terrible in Episode III, just look at the delivery of some of the lines "I can't look anymore" "send me to kill the emperor" when he was watching the security recordings; that whole scene is off. Portman was equally awful with her fake cry in this movie.

Edit: Glad I'm not the only one. Yes, the are good actors, they have showed it in other movies, but they were awful in the prequels.

Disney will want to get as far away from the prequels as possible. They are tainted.
 
Yes, McGregor was terrible in Episode III, just look at the delivery of some of the lines "I can't look anymore" "send me to kill the emperor" when he was watching the security recordings; that whole scene is off. Portman was equally awful with her fake cry in this movie.

Edit: Glad I'm not the only one. Yes, the are good actors, they have showed it in other movies, but they were awful in the prequels.

Disney will want to get as far away from the prequels as possible. They are tainted.

**Sigh**

You and I are just not going to get along.
 
Nah, Paramount used Star Trek to remake Star Wars :)

Seriously though - the idea that Star Wars is untouchable, especially considering the dilution of the brand - and that's what it is more than anything, a brand, and not a cohesive storytelling experience - seems silly, to me. It's Star Wars.

I'm confident they will eventually recast Indiana Jones yet I still don't think they will do remakes of the Star Wars films. I would have been entirely ok with them recasting the characters for the sequel trilogy though.
 
Yes, McGregor was terrible in Episode III, just look at the delivery of some of the lines "I can't look anymore" "send me to kill the emperor" when he was watching the security recordings; that whole scene is off. Portman was equally awful with her fake cry in this movie.

Edit: Glad I'm not the only one. Yes, the are good actors, they have showed it in other movies, but they were awful in the prequels.

Disney will want to get as far away from the prequels as possible. They are tainted.

Disney knows the prequels suck and are ignoring them. I remember a year or two ago when Star Tours 2 got announced they had a fan conference with the Imagineers and the guy gets on stage and was like "I'm here to announce that Jar Jar will be the pilot this time around" when everyone went silent he was like "haha hell no". In all of Disney's talk so far they just want to use the main star wars trilogy as a baseline and build off of that.
 

ascii42

Member
He saved Batman? That's why Dark knight rising didn't even sell as many tickets as Tim Burton's Batman movie did (http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/22/batman-89-sold-more-tickets-than-the-dark-knight-rises)? Oh and Batman didn't need saving. He already had Bruce Timm and Paul Dini telling the best stories of his existence.

If Nolan was directing the characters would be completely unrecognizable, the iconic music replaced with mundane Hans Zimmer esque crap, the lightsabers would be removed for not being "realistic" enough and there would be some dumb plot twist towards the end of the film like "Luke was dead the whole time!"

Why use the first Batman movie as an example? How were ticket sales trending for the following movies.
 

jtb

Banned
Even ignoring the fact that Nolan has long lost his directorial touch, Nolan would never take the job. And Lucas/Kennedy would never offer it to him.
 

ghostmind

Member
Thank the gods Rick McCallum is gone. The one person that should have called Lucas on his shit during the prequels but instead was his biggest "yes-man" around.

Now I have hope.
 

andycapps

Member
I thought McGregor was pretty bad in the prequels. Far from his best roles. He didn't have much to work with since his lines were usually really bad, but his performance was pretty wooden most of the time. Some good moments interspersed in there. The end fight and his "NOOOOOO!" there was pretty good.
 

jtb

Banned
Thank the gods Rick McCallum is gone. The one person that should have called Lucas on his shit during the prequels but instead was his biggest "yes-man" around.

Now I have hope.

what is it with Ricks?

But yeah he was fucking terrible. Watching his reactions to the dumb shit Lucas proposes in the making of doc to the Phantom Menace is both hilarious and depressing.
 

ascii42

Member
I thought McGregor was pretty bad in the prequels. Far from his best roles. He didn't have much to work with since his lines were usually really bad, but his performance was pretty wooden most of the time. Some good moments interspersed in there. The end fight and his "NOOOOOO!" there was pretty good.

Well, largely the jedi are supposed to be calm and reserved. In Episode I, Obi-Wan is still young, so he's more emotional and excitable, but Ewan McGregor moves toward how Obi-Wan acted in Episode IV as the series progressed.
 

JeTmAn81

Member
I thought McGregor was pretty bad in the prequels. Far from his best roles. He didn't have much to work with since his lines were usually really bad, but his performance was pretty wooden most of the time. Some good moments interspersed in there. The end fight and his "NOOOOOO!" there was pretty good.

"Only a Sith deals in absolutes!"

Yeah, the writing did him no favors.
 

DrEvil

not a medical professional
It WILL be incredibly weird not to see/hear the 20th Century Fox fanfare over Ep7, instead, the disney logo and 'wish upon a star' theme immediately before 'a long time ago, in a galaxy far.. far away"
 
Top Bottom