Count Dookkake
Member
.
what is it with Ricks?
But yeah he was fucking terrible. Watching his reactions to the dumb shit Lucas proposes in the making of doc to the Phantom Menace is both hilarious and depressing.
They will fanfare-ize "Wish Upon a Star."
Even ignoring the fact that Nolan has long lost his directorial touch, Nolan would never take the job. And Lucas/Kennedy would never offer it to him.
Even ignoring the fact that Nolan has long lost his directorial touch, Nolan would never take the job. And Lucas/Kennedy would never offer it to him.
Although I don't think he's lost his touch (though TDKR, Inception, and even TDK were sloppy), he did make his best movie, The Prestige, in 2006. Give him at least a decade before he's lost his touch!
Also, I don't think Nolan is even of a visual effects guru to handle Star Wars. Not even talking "special effects in every shot!!!"...he's a visual storyteller, but not the right person for this.
Well, largely the jedi are supposed to be calm and reserved. In Episode I, Obi-Wan is still young, so he's more emotional and excitable, but Ewan McGregor moves toward how Obi-Wan acted in Episode IV as the series progressed.
Ewan McGregor's acting in the prequels always felt like he had a poker stick lodged up his arsehole.
His speach to Annakin at the end of 3 brought tears to my eyes.LOL. McGregor is a great actor, but throughout Episode 2 and 3 he clearly does not give a single fuck about these movies.
They reset Star Trek, of all things.
There is a part of me that's still amazed Lucas tapped out. He admitted the franchise needs to move forward, yet he could not do it himself. Amazing.
Which is why we're still raging about them a decade after the fact, have 90 minute videos dissecting their failures, and documentaries about how Lucas screwed the fans.
The clone wars animated series has been hugely successful. Prequel era won't be forgotten. And it will always be included in the massive boxsets. It's quality isn't up there with the rest but being part of the franchise means it will always be there. It's like saying the Roger Moore era of James Bond will be forgotten. The prequels are 3 films in a massively popular franchise and will be in every boxset from here on for the rest of our lives.
They'll remake Star Wars at some point. It's not in any way untouchable. It's not Lawrence of Arabia or Gone With the Wind. It's Star Wars.
I seriously hope you don't go through life being as wrong about everything as you are this.
Well, not EVERYTHING.
Actually, this is a pretty safe thing to be wrong about. If only my worst mistakes in life were the ones I made bullshitting with fellow nerds on messageboards.
Who the fuck among us wouldn't want to see a trilogy with Yoda as the central character when he was a young Jedi?
I see you're getting into that whole "Being Horribly Wrong" thing I seem to have popularized.
Always thought Ian McDiarmid was the best thing about 1-3. Man was born to play Palpatine, and revels in it.
Dude single-handedly made Ep. 3 watchable. Everyone else sucked.
EDIT: Having him fight with a lightsaber was extremely stupid though. Same thing with Yoda.
He saved Batman? That's why Dark knight rising didn't even sell as many tickets as Tim Burton's Batman movie did (http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/22/batman-89-sold-more-tickets-than-the-dark-knight-rises)? Oh and Batman didn't need saving. He already had Bruce Timm and Paul Dini telling the best stories of his existence.
If Nolan was directing the characters would be completely unrecognizable, the iconic music replaced with mundane Hans Zimmer esque crap, the lightsabers would be removed for not being "realistic" enough and there would be some dumb plot twist towards the end of the film like "Luke was dead the whole time!"
I kind of liked the Palpatine/Windu saber fight, because of how obviously outclassed Palpatine was. He wasn't meant to fight.
Which is why it's weird that he cut down three other Jedi in the span of like 10 seconds right before fighting Windu.
Whether you like his Batman movies or not, its pretty much fact that yes after the Shumaker movies, Batman on film was essentially dead. Nolan revived Batman with Begins and then with TDK made Batman arguably the most bankable character on the planet. Yet instead of comparing the commercial and critical success you bring up an IGN article about ticket sales? LOL. You can compare the economics of film, prices, and tickets from 20-30 years ago to now and make all sorts of assumptions but why go out of your way to do that?
Seriously you back up your argument that Nolan didn't save Batman by bringing up the ticket sales from the very first Batman movie made? You do realize that where Batman was left off after the Schumaker movies was a completely different place than where Burton started?
The rest of your post makes even less sense. Unrecognizable characters? Really? Especially when Burton and Schumaker completely twisted and reintroduced their own versions of the characters? When they butchered Gordon completely? Yet Nolan mishandled them? And twist ending? Which Batman movie had a twist ending? I think you are thinking of M Night.
Many people that have seen the movie were shocked when I told them Anna Hathway was playing as Catwoman almost everyones reaction was "oh that was supposed to be catwoman??". Bane is NOTHING like his comic counterpart, they stripped Ra's Al Ghul of what made him special, abruptly set up two face just to kill him off, and then threw some bizarre nod to Robin at the end of the third movie. And the twist ending im refering to?Batman dies at the end of DKR but then it turns out he survived...or is it all in Alfreds head? Same crap he pulelled with Inception
I thought Hathaway's portrayal was pretty dead-on. Bane is different, sure, but it works. He's still a brilliant powerful character. Or did you prefer Batman and Robin's version?
or is it all in Alfreds head?
They will fanfare-ize "Wish Upon a Star."
I refuse to believe that anyone thinks this.
Many people that have seen the movie were shocked when I told them Anna Hathway was playing as Catwoman almost everyones reaction was "oh that was supposed to be catwoman??". Bane is NOTHING like his comic counterpart, they stripped Ra's Al Ghul of what made him special, abruptly set up two face just to kill him off, and then threw some bizarre nod to Robin at the end of the third movie. And the twist ending im refering to?Batman dies at the end of DKR but then it turns out he survived...or is it all in Alfreds head? Same crap he pulelled with Inception
I prefer the version depicted in comics, animation, and video games.
Eh I'm as big a Nolan hater as they come, but I can appreciate that audiences love what Nolan did with the Batman movies. It's just the right mix of pretentious and mass-market to really hit the right nerve with audiences and while that may sound like a backhanded compliment, it's not. People like being told they're smart, and Nolan films do that really well and that's clearly reflected in the box office.
Plus, Batman Begins is a legitimately good film. It's TDK and TDKR where the shit went off the rails anyways.
Eh I'm as big a Nolan hater as they come, but I can appreciate that audiences love what Nolan did with the Batman movies. It's just the right mix of pretentious and mass-market to really hit the right nerve with audiences and while that may sound like a backhanded compliment, it's not. People like being told they're smart, and Nolan films do that really well and that's clearly reflected in the box office.
lol it's like you are making a joke post based on what effzee was talking about in the TDKR thread, except you're serious.
What i mean when i say the universe is huge and they don't need to remake anything is that they can do stuff go back to Old Republic days. Who the fuck among us wouldn't want to see a trilogy with Yoda as the central character when he was a young Jedi?
The prequels were filled with good to great actors. Liam Neeson, Ewan MacGregor, Natalie Portman, Samual L. Jackson. Outside of Star Wars, these are memorable performers. I've heard that even Hayden Christensen is actually a pretty good actor, though I haven't seen him in anything else. But they were all horrible in the prequels. I think it was a combination of horrible direction, horrible dialog, green screen sets and CGI monsters giving them nothing tangible to react to, and just plain miscasting in the case of Jackson (his strength is not playing reserved, emotionless monks, Red Letter Media's take is spot on).
Like Shrek?Yoda as the central character when he was a young Jedi?
Many people that have seen the movie were shocked when I told them Anna Hathway was playing as Catwoman almost everyones reaction was "oh that was supposed to be catwoman??". Bane is NOTHING like his comic counterpart, they stripped Ra's Al Ghul of what made him special, abruptly set up two face just to kill him off, and then threw some bizarre nod to Robin at the end of the third movie. And the twist ending im refering to?Batman dies at the end of DKR but then it turns out he survived...or is it all in Alfreds head? Same crap he pulelled with Inception
Many people that have seen the movie were shocked when I told them Anna Hathway was playing as Catwoman almost everyones reaction was "oh that was supposed to be catwoman??". Bane is NOTHING like his comic counterpart, they stripped Ra's Al Ghul of what made him special, abruptly set up two face just to kill him off, and then threw some bizarre nod to Robin at the end of the third movie. And the twist ending im refering to?.Batman dies at the end of DKR but then it turns out he survived...or is it all in Alfreds head? Same crap he pulelled with Inception
"I'm not surprised but totally geeked by the idea of there being more 'Star Wars,'" Jackson told E! News at the Spike TV Video Game Awards Friday. "It's like, okay, Obi-Wan was dead when episode four started, so maybe everyone thinks I'm dead and we'll find out what happened to Mace Windu. I can come back as one-armed or a one-handed Jedi that's still around that didn't actually die."
Sounds interesting, right?
When asked if he would definitely come back for the film, Jackson said, "Hell yeah!"
"I could do that or be a ghost hologram. I don't care," Jackson quipped. "I just want to stay associated with the franchise. Not that I won't because I've been in three of them."
Obi Wan was dead when EpIV started? So Jackson didn't actually watch any of the movies he was in or those thereafter? lol
Ive rarely thought of that. It's weird because most of the people of the republic/Empire know him as "General Kenobi". why just change the first name?People thought he died in the clone wars. Ben Kenobi was clearly alive. How people didn't put the two names together is something only George knows...oh yeah, he thinks the audience is stupid /Plinkett
EON never remade a James Bond movie and Paramount never remade a Star Trek movie. Reboots are not remakes.
Ive rarely thought of that. It's weird because most of the people of the republic/Empire know him as "General Kenobi". why just change the first name?