Why use "obviate" when remove or remove is good enough?
Because words are fun.
Why use "obviate" when remove or remove is good enough?
No sympathy from me towards the people who lose their jobs. I mean... the business is just looking to save some money but replacing robots. Just like people who buy online to save money rather than buying from local stores (big box or otherwise).
Do you work for Best Buy? Damn that is some cold blooded shit.
I can't stop laughing at this.
I can't stop laughing at this.
Do you work for Best Buy? Damn that is some cold blooded shit.
I can't stop laughing at this.
Why use "obviate" when remove or remove is good enough?
Its creators believe their patty-flipping Alpha robot could save the fast-food industry
And I think it's fascinating
This is the startup's website
I saw the link on this blog I frequent (the author wrote Lights in the Tunnel, a book I plug often in threads).
And thought it would be interesting to read about - generally the premise is, this startup claims that their robot is faster, more sanitary and effecient than 2-3 human staffers, and is cheap enough that it can make restaurants money back within a year - some interesting quotes from the blog:
What does GAF think? Is this company going to be successful? Are there going to be other companies that come in and try to do the same? What sort of economical effect will it have, 'obliterating' kitchen staff in fast food restaurants?
And with this, a lot of jobs will be gone, but this is the future.
And who is gonna save all the jobs lost?
Mind you that IIRC this kind of job are either:
1. Students earniing some money to live/party/whatever
2. Peple with no studies that can only access this kind of job
Can someone tell me what those workers are supposed to do? They can't recycle themselves into another position due having no studies so...more unemployment?
I wouldn't be so sure. Soon the fast food market will need minimum-wage computer experts and machinists to maintain the machines!Yep, this is going to happen. A whole lot of people are going to need more crappy jobs.
This is the necessary conclusion of a technologically advanced society.As if Americans haven't lost enough jobs.
Lmaooo... So great.
-- The explosion of robotics happened over 20 years ago, and people are shocked that they can actually see the shockwaves now? If you're working in a semiskilled job that you can train a high schooler to perform by rote, you're gonna' have a bad time.
Robots won't spit in my food
dawn of a new day
As if Americans haven't lost enough jobs.
Awwww, it's not an android robot - it's just a machine
Why use "obviate" when remove or remove is good enough?
AHHHH holy shit I lost it at the end of the second one. Whew. Needed that.
Haven't like, a million people tried to do the exact same thing? Of all the potentially automated processes, is this one even particularly challenging?
Also, does the robot clean itself?
Americans should be getting an educate and looking at jobs that require higher skills and more challenging not aiming for the burger flipping jobs
Lol! I like how the little green arms swing around before it starts crapping out ketchup.
Think of it this way it will open jobs to support the malfunctioning of these things.As if Americans haven't lost enough jobs.
The endgame has always been robot labor, and the fact governments spend no time or energy trying to figure out to how to deal with the inevitable repercussions is profoundly disturbing. The majority of jobs are poverty wage level affairs that will eventually be replaced by robots. The societal and economic damage is not something you can just "quickly adjust" to. But just like peak oil and alternative energy, I guess we prefer to just bury our heads in the sand until it's too late to do anything.
On a related note, I always found it intriguing that this is one of the issues which drove Ted Kaczynski to murder. Did he go crazy and this was just one of the ideas his deluded mind latched onto as an excuse to kill? Or did he go crazy because he couldn't convince anyone to take this deeply personal belief of his seriously? Or maybe, as he argues himself, he's not actually crazy, he just believes the ends justify the means and if killing people gets society to deal with the problem than so be it.
-- What's hilarious is that you can take entire sections of Kaczynski's manifesto and read them with a totally straight face now. Eerily prescient in parts.On a related note, I always found it intriguing that this is one of the issues which drove Ted Kaczynski to murder. Did he go crazy and this was just one of the ideas his deluded mind latched onto as an excuse to kill? Or did he go crazy because he couldn't convince anyone to take this deeply personal belief of his seriously? Or maybe, as he argues himself, he's not actually crazy, he just believes the ends justify the means and if killing people gets society to deal with the problem than so be it.
-- It's a growth industry.Yeah let's find a way to destroy jobs.
As if Americans haven't lost enough jobs.
Broken window fallacy.Yeah let's find a way to destroy jobs.